I it doesn't necessarily mean there would be another no lynch but it makes it much more likely. So although odds are that player X is a townie.  If a no lynch leads to the scum getting an extra kill.  Odds are it won't be player X and it 100% chance that the player is a townie.

If weakest player had a neutral or slightly positive effect on the town.  Meaning the participate, aren't a distraction. use sound reasoning, are clear in there posts. know what's going on and make informed decisions.  Then yes the town wouldn't be better off without them.  However if the weakest player has a negative effect on the town.  I'm all for taking the weakest player out.

However it seems the player that stands out is often the weakest player. 

you know, call me crazy, but I wouldn't mind lynching both radish and wonk either.

That exchange did sound artificial, especially wonk's "I have not pushed for his lynch", and original reasoning giving non-participation as an excuse. I believe him when he says he doesn't want to lynch him, and I also notice the conditional "we will see how it plays out". I also notice the increased presence of radish after their discussion.

Actually, the post that most makes me suspicious of wonk and his pushing for radish's lynch (yes, that's what he was doing), is this one.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3910092

In hindsight, it reads like "I smell opportunity."

you know, call me crazy, but I wouldn't mind lynching both radish and wonk either.

That exchange did sound artificial, especially wonk's "I have not pushed for his lynch", and original reasoning giving non-participation as an excuse. I believe him when he says he doesn't want to lynch him, and I also notice the conditional "we will see how it plays out". I also notice the increased presence of radish after their discussion.

Question: Linkzmax claimed earlier he saw something interesting from Wonk that he would use later. Could this be what what he was talking about?

I think you misread my post. Townie X is the player that scum will kill over night, for whatever reason.(no trail, biggest threat, etc.) Chances are the "weak player" isn't townie X, so you are right in that sense. Though it's not a 100% chance that a night kill is a townie, but that would mean there's a rediretor, bus driver, or some other role and I don't think that's likely here. Last sentence is more for future rounds.

See even the weakest of townies has a vote and removing that vote means mafia has an easier time mislynching. I am of the opinion that if I believe a weaker player to be a townie, then I will try harder to show I'm a townie and steer them in the direction of voting for mafia than the mafia will. I see it as a matter of not just avoiding being outwitted by scum, but not letting the same happen to another.

You're crazy. :P

On a somewhat-related note: noname's post rings quite a bell with the flag I alluded to earlier. Time travel notwithstanding, there are explanations that simply don't fit.

Until I explain further, the flag makes me more suspicious of Wonk and less so of radish. To draw a parallel to last round, if ABC is nen then Wonk is MG/SAK and radish is scottie/IMU/Soleron. Then again I can see it from your perspective. If radish and Wonk are both mafia, it would've been the perfect way to give the "order" to be more productive this round, since they couldn't talk secretly yet.