By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
A Bad Clown said:
radishhead said:
noname2200 said:
A Bad Clown said:

This is where I though Wonk was starting to get at Radish

 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3911291

Then

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3911977

Which made it look like he was suspecting something

Later

 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3912626

I thought is was funny how instantly he was satisfied with that

I can see how this might make you suspicious of wonk, but why would that make you suspicious of radish?

I think he's suggesting that we're conspiring together, and that the argument was a fake


Correct.

The reasons listed lead me to believe that the arguement was a fallacy.

If it was, I believe that it would shift the blame from both users.

Radish is seemingly cooperative, which leads me to question Wonk's aliby.

I do not believe a "mafia" would try to infrom the other users that I believed the arguement was false.

Thanks, I guess?..

However, I don't know how the argument looks like from an outsider's perspective, but it definitely felt very heated when I was having it. I was having to think fairly hard of ways to respond to Wonk's accusations. What is it about the argument that looks fake? 



Click this button, you know you want to!  [Subscribe]

Watch me on YouTube!

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheRadishBros

~~~~ Mario Kart 8 drove far past my expectations! Never again will I doubt the wheels of a Monster Franchise! :0 ~~~~

Around the Network
A Bad Clown said:
noname2200 said:
A Bad Clown said:


I knew we could change votes, I said when we started I thought they were joke posts or placeholders.  BRB from posts

Then why did you say "I assume it was a joke vote because it looks like now we can unvote"?


I knew that when I played we could unvote because we had a small amount of players, but I thought it'd be different here. If we can unvote with 11 players I thought it would be a mess. I looked back at the post after seeing people unvote and decided that we were able to here also.

You're contradicting yourself here, though.  Your initial reaction to my vote was to joke around with me.  It was only hours later that you said that you might have to vote for me, based on my vote.  And again, that marked the second time I'd voted for someone.  Additionally, we'd had others unvote as well.  They were bolded and everything...



radishhead said:
A Bad Clown said:
radishhead said:
noname2200 said:
A Bad Clown said:

This is where I though Wonk was starting to get at Radish

 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3911291

Then

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3911977

Which made it look like he was suspecting something

Later

 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3912626

I thought is was funny how instantly he was satisfied with that

I can see how this might make you suspicious of wonk, but why would that make you suspicious of radish?

I think he's suggesting that we're conspiring together, and that the argument was a fake


Correct.

The reasons listed lead me to believe that the arguement was a fallacy.

If it was, I believe that it would shift the blame from both users.

Radish is seemingly cooperative, which leads me to question Wonk's aliby.

I do not believe a "mafia" would try to infrom the other users that I believed the arguement was false.

Thanks, I guess?..

However, I don't know how the argument looks like from an outsider's perspective, but it definitely felt very heated when I was having it. I was having to think fairly hard of ways to respond to Wonk's accusations. What is it about the argument that looks fake? 


In the start, I believed it was a arguement where Wonk thought you were suspicious.

During the course, it seemed that the arguement was only between you two.

I saw that several users posted their thoughts on it, but they were largely not involved to a far extent.

During this time, I was being interrogated and questioned until I slept.

When Wonk easily forgave you, it was when I was not present.

I assumed you two wanted to end it quick, because the other users on line may have started to go after you.

If you two were "mafia", it would have not been good to be arguing while the only distraction was gone.

Users such as Linkzmax or Noname may have been able to start to see through one of you.

If that was the case, if you two were "Mafia", one would have been lynched day one.

Those are my reasons for my suspicions.



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
A Bad Clown said:

Regarding this question, was user: Noname occupied the day before today?

Yes, I was helping a friend move.  Although for future reference, keep in mind that I and most other players won't be glued to our screens for the entire game: we've agreed to play a game of mafia, not to devote our lives to it.   And unlike the rest of you snowed-in losers, I've got some of the best Winter weather ever to enjoy.



noname2200 said:
A Bad Clown said:
noname2200 said:
A Bad Clown said:


I knew we could change votes, I said when we started I thought they were joke posts or placeholders.  BRB from posts

Then why did you say "I assume it was a joke vote because it looks like now we can unvote"?


I knew that when I played we could unvote because we had a small amount of players, but I thought it'd be different here. If we can unvote with 11 players I thought it would be a mess. I looked back at the post after seeing people unvote and decided that we were able to here also.

You're contradicting yourself here, though.  Your initial reaction to my vote was to joke around with me.  It was only hours later that you said that you might have to vote for me, based on my vote.  And again, that marked the second time I'd voted for someone.  Additionally, we'd had others unvote as well.  They were bolded and everything...

After several hours, It appeared to me logically you would keep your vote on me.

At the time, Trashleg also voted and other forum goes would have wanted to join.

It became apparent it was not worth it to vote you, as I was having my own problems.

If you did not take notice, you did not formally  unvote when I was voted.



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
Around the Network
noname2200 said:
A Bad Clown said:

Regarding this question, was user: Noname occupied the day before today?

Yes, I was helping a friend move.  Although for future reference, keep in mind that I and most other players won't be glued to our screens for the entire game: we've agreed to play a game of mafia, not to devote our lives to it.   And unlike the rest of you snowed-in losers, I've got some of the best Winter weather ever to enjoy.

My sensors indicate it is 72 degrees when I am.



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*

Please, turn off robot mode- it's not helping you to be understood, and it's just rage-worthy >:(

As you mentioned, that argument was just between me and Wonk, and it didn't matter that you were gone, because you weren't involved. It was just a coincidence that the argument concluded fairly soon after you left. There was just nothing more to say on the subject.

You admitted yourself that you didn't understand the back-story behind the argument - and that's one of the main reasons why it ended so abrubtly. He was complaining that I didn't do much to help the town last game after I was confirmed to be a town member (which was true). We both realised that we had become equals in terms of playstyle, and it was quite a funny realisation (hence the "keep it up", "you too").



Click this button, you know you want to!  [Subscribe]

Watch me on YouTube!

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheRadishBros

~~~~ Mario Kart 8 drove far past my expectations! Never again will I doubt the wheels of a Monster Franchise! :0 ~~~~

radishhead said:

Please, turn off robot mode- it's not helping you to be understood, and it's just rage-worthy >:(

As you mentioned, that argument was just between me and Wonk, and it didn't matter that you were gone, because you weren't involved. It was just a coincidence that the argument concluded fairly soon after you left. There was just nothing more to say on the subject.

You admitted yourself that you didn't understand the back-story behind the argument - and that's one of the main reasons why it ended so abrubtly. He was complaining that I didn't do much to help the town last game after I was confirmed to be a town member (which was true). We both realised that we had become equals in terms of playstyle, and it was quite a funny realisation (hence the "keep it up", "you too").


I detected animosity during the statements after looking at the new statements that were posted during my slumber.

Robot mode seems to be working better, I do not want to go on about how I cannot logically sleep or where I played this before. I am very sorry.



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:

1To carry the last post further:
Additionally, if ABC flips townie then we'd have some good leads from whoever continued to push for the lynch, so really it's a win-win.

1) Here I completely disagree. If ABC flips town, we have absolutely NO good leads. ABC has made it a point to give everyone a good reason to lynch him. He has been disruptive, has miscommunicated in huge ways, and displayed extreme flaws in logic. Nobody is suspicious for lynching him. 

First, I'm going to admit I quickly get a townie vibe with you each game and that's back again. I'm hopeful that's true because I'm dreading the time when you're mafia.(unless I am too, :D ) Even if the vibe I have is wrong, the fact that you have the same stance towards ABC that I do makes me feel like it actually would produce leads. Yes he's been disruptive, miscommunicating, and illogical, but I don't see anything to make me very suspicious of him. He's an annoyance that should be ignored and investigated yes, but if he's scum then I'm not going to fall for his little jabs at everyone. Since it has been stated a couple times now that this is likely the best course of action, so that others can be focused upon, I would actually find it suspicious for anyone to continue to push his lynch.



If anyone wants me to further clarify, I can started putting

 

Obsevation:

Emotion:

Response:

Like HK-47...



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*