What does this mean?  And why do you bring it up, exactly?

That post was when it was clown feeding frezy and I just woke up to see all the stuff that happened about me. You can leave questions for me but don't do it in giant reply chains like I'm still in the conversations. Maybe if someone posted "Hey Clown, how come _______________" seperate from qoutes I could. It's too hard to keep track when there's giant quote chains all over and people are saying I didn't answer a question I couldn't see.

I knew we could change votes, I said when we started I thought they were joke posts or placeholders.  BRB from posts

So your goal this game is to avoid looking suspicious?

As I've said I don't want to go into it too much because I know when seeing people talk a lot about previous games I wasn't part of I felt like an outsider and I dislike being the one doing that here.  I've done it more than I like already.  Although I might give you some basics

I've come to look at the game differently.  At first I was thinking every townie is important.  Now (not counting roles that are obviously more important) I see how some are more important than others and some can even be harmful.

I view the lynch differently.  Before I thought of it as a tool to be used only when we have good information.  Now I see it has many more uses. Getting information, taking out the weak, or just putting pressure on someone without them actually being lynched.

I've also thought more about the numbers and see how a no lynch day one can lead to another no lynch needed latter in the game.  So instead of letting the scum get another kill of their choice by having 2 no lynches I figure one an "random" would be better.  Random in quotes because the roles are assigned randomly so unless something really stands out to make us vote for someone specifically.  I figure taking out the weakest player would be just as likely to be scum as anyone and lets us have a stronger town remaining. Even if we don't end up lynching the weakest player at least we've put pressure on them to play better.  With a "random" lynch or a truly random lynch at least scum might get killed while they won't when it is only them who decide so better odds for the town.

Then why did you say "I assume it was a joke vote because it looks like now we can unvote"?

You are right I wasn't questioning radish. Radish joined in the discussion obviously but even then it was a discussion based more on past playstyle than any current suspicion.

This is where I though Wonk was starting to get at Radish

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3911291

Then

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3911977

Which made it look like he was suspecting something

Later

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3912626

I thought is was funny how instantly he was satisfied with that

Not particularly- but since he commented that I looked suspicious, I thought that I might as well answer his concerns. Since TBC was trying to get me lynched at that point, it would have been a bad choice to just let it lie

I knew that when I played we could unvote because we had a small amount of players, but I thought it'd be different here. If we can unvote with 11 players I thought it would be a mess. I looked back at the post after seeing people unvote and decided that we were able to here also.