By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Sony's latest attack on customer freedom

twesterm said:
M.U.G.E.N said:

this is getting tiring. mods should just start locking up the crazy amount of hacking related threads in the sony forums.


Only if we can do the same thing a next big game comes out.

Seriously, it's news, get over it.  Unless you don't care if I bitch and moan about the sony forums being covered with Killzone 3 threads and get them all locked then there's no reason you should bitch and moan there are threads about this subject.

While it didn't bring much new to light, I did think it was an interesting read.


not sure what's got you all worked up but w/e

if people make around 4-5 killzone threads..about the SAME darn thing, one opinion piece thread, one thread about what one analyst thinks, one about how random guy on a university thinks this is wrong etc etc get posted cluttering the forum yes, it should be moderated and taken care of.

So bitch and moan all you want, not like I care. It's my opinion on the matter, if you don't like it, too bad, get over it



In-Kat-We-Trust Brigade!

"This world is Merciless, and it's also very beautiful"

For All News/Info related to the PlayStation Vita, Come and join us in the Official PSV Thread!

Around the Network
Euphoria14 said:

People should be on more of a "protect our consumer rights" approach.

If I do not really own the PS3 to the point where I could do what I want then I want my $600 back. I went into a store and BOUGHT the PS3. I did not lease it. I am not renting it. It is not loaned to me by SONY.

I bought it. I OWN it. I can put whatever I want into it and take whatever I want out of it.

If I am pirating  games and breaking the law, go ahead and try and get me there. Don't try to get me because I got it to do things it couldn't before. 

 

Also, a case like this may one day down the road cause things like your car to only be able to be fixed with specific brand parts and anything else could result in a fine.

Or anything along those lines. 

Nobody should be supporting SONY and their bullshit being brought about in this case.

 

Too bad, Geohot released the Keys. The keys are nothing but numbers. SONY can not own numbers.

This is to Trios as well:

Look, I know where you're both coming from, and trust me, I agree with a lot of what you said (and I even stated I hope Sony lose the case, and instead figure out a way of dealing with this without screwing us over).

But Euphoria what I will NOT condone from the hackers is to spread the keys for others to start cheating online. I didn't pay money only to play single player games.

That is not fighting for rights. No, that's just another way of screwing us innocent consumers over.

And on another note: What about the Terms of Service?



Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!

Kojima: Come out with Project S already!

huaxiong90 said:
Euphoria14 said:

People should be on more of a "protect our consumer rights" approach.

If I do not really own the PS3 to the point where I could do what I want then I want my $600 back. I went into a store and BOUGHT the PS3. I did not lease it. I am not renting it. It is not loaned to me by SONY.

I bought it. I OWN it. I can put whatever I want into it and take whatever I want out of it.

If I am pirating  games and breaking the law, go ahead and try and get me there. Don't try to get me because I got it to do things it couldn't before. 

 

Also, a case like this may one day down the road cause things like your car to only be able to be fixed with specific brand parts and anything else could result in a fine.

Or anything along those lines. 

Nobody should be supporting SONY and their bullshit being brought about in this case.

 

Too bad, Geohot released the Keys. The keys are nothing but numbers. SONY can not own numbers.

This is to Trios as well:

Look, I know where you're both coming from, and trust me, I agree with a lot of what you said (and I even stated I hope Sony lose the case, and instead figure out a way of dealing with this without screwing us over).

But Euphoria I will NOT condone from the hackers is to spread the keys for others to start cheating online. I didn't pay money only to play single player games.

That is not fighting for rights. No, that's just another way of screwing us innocent consumers over.

And on another note: What about the Terms of Service?


It is SONY's job to stop the people abusing online.

This kind of stuff has been happening on PC and 360 for years.

 

In order to gain additional security you will need to forfeit something.



iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.

Currently playing:

Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)     

    

Got a retro room? Post it here!

Euphoria14 said:

It is SONY's job to stop the people abusing online.

This kind of stuff has been happening on PC and 360 for years.

 

In order to gain additional security you will need to forfeit something.

I really hope they start actively monitoring PSN...because the online cheating is what's worrying me the most right now.

I can avoid it on PC due to dedicated servers thankfully, but on consoles it's not easy at all.



Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!

Kojima: Come out with Project S already!

huaxiong90 said:
Euphoria14 said:

It is SONY's job to stop the people abusing online.

This kind of stuff has been happening on PC and 360 for years.

 

In order to gain additional security you will need to forfeit something.

I really hope they start actively monitoring PSN...because the online cheating is what's worrying me the most right now.

I can avoid it on PC due to dedicated servers thankfully, but on consoles it's not easy at all.


Well many 1st party PS3 games run on dedicated servers. MW2 seems to have issues right now but it is p2p.

I think games like KZ3 for example should be fine because unless I am mistaken, it should be easy to track the cheaters if those hacks mess with the info on the server at all.



iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.

Currently playing:

Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)     

    

Got a retro room? Post it here!

Around the Network

sony is going about this the wrong way.

lawsuits are counterproductive for the most part.

Sony will lose the majority if not all their lawsuits.....you heard it here 1st



Euphoria14 said:
dharh said:
Euphoria14 said:

I'm sorry, did Geohot pirate anything? What did he steal?

He has to steal something first before you call him a thief.

Is he an attention whore? Yes. 

Is he a thief? Absolutely not.

 

If not then you are of the party that thinks anything unrelated to PS3 and/or SONY should be punishable by law, which includes modding.

If so then happy future where you have no consumer rights because you will only bring it upon yourself.


He stole and distributed intellectual property imo.

Modding hardware per se is not necessarily an offense. Selling/buying the means to do so is illegal. Using the mod to use pirated software is illegal.

Id actually be happy with a completely open system run on open source software. Though that would also _require_ console software to switch over to the PC model where software often 'phones' home and uses authentication keys to validate their authenticity for network usage. And even then you get very shitty multiplayer experiences with bots and hacks all over the bloody place.

What im happy with and whats _legal_ are not necessarily the same thing. You can argue for your utopia all you want, doesn't make it especially legal.

Which IP?

XMB? 

So we never technically own the PS3?

 

If so and they wish to go this route I would have no issues if they didn't charge us hundreds of dollars to get something we don't own.

If you are being ignorant enough to agree to a Terms of Agreement then defend breaking it and those who purposely go break it and pirate be my guest. A terms of agreement could say I own your soul and if you click agree you can't go and say that's not true, even though you agreed to it. Your "consumer rights" means nothing if you agree to it.



dharh said:
Euphoria14 said:

People should be on more of a "protect our consumer rights" approach.

If I do not really own the PS3 to the point where I could do what I want then I want my $600 back.

 

Also, a case like this may one day down the road cause things like your car to only be able to be fixed with specific brand parts and anything else could result in a fine.

Or anything along those lines. 

Nobody should be supporting SONY and their bullshit being brought about in this case.

 

Too bad, Geohot released the Keys. The keys are nothing but numbers. SONY can not own numbers.

Should you be able to run games you don't own on the PS3? Should you be able to run bots and hack games on PSN?

No sony can't own 'numbers', however sony does own the intellectual property that runs the PS3. You do not have the right to steal that intellectual property and distribute it to others. Geohot is nothing more than a glorified thief.

This lawsuit is not about piracy at all, or hacking the psn. You guys should read it over maybe than you will see where we are coming from



stopstopp said:
Euphoria14 said:
dharh said:
Euphoria14 said:

I'm sorry, did Geohot pirate anything? What did he steal?

He has to steal something first before you call him a thief.

Is he an attention whore? Yes. 

Is he a thief? Absolutely not.

 

If not then you are of the party that thinks anything unrelated to PS3 and/or SONY should be punishable by law, which includes modding.

If so then happy future where you have no consumer rights because you will only bring it upon yourself.


He stole and distributed intellectual property imo.

Modding hardware per se is not necessarily an offense. Selling/buying the means to do so is illegal. Using the mod to use pirated software is illegal.

Id actually be happy with a completely open system run on open source software. Though that would also _require_ console software to switch over to the PC model where software often 'phones' home and uses authentication keys to validate their authenticity for network usage. And even then you get very shitty multiplayer experiences with bots and hacks all over the bloody place.

What im happy with and whats _legal_ are not necessarily the same thing. You can argue for your utopia all you want, doesn't make it especially legal.

Which IP?

XMB? 

So we never technically own the PS3?

 

If so and they wish to go this route I would have no issues if they didn't charge us hundreds of dollars to get something we don't own.

If you are being ignorant enough to agree to a Terms of Agreement then defend breaking it and those who purposely go break it and pirate be my guest. A terms of agreement could say I own your soul and if you click agree you can't go and say that's not true, even though you agreed to it. Your "consumer rights" means nothing if you agree to it

Sorry but you cannot not contract yourself out of your rights. If anything in the ToS is not lawful it is nullified. Many ToS don't really hold much weight in court as they violate so many consumer rights. Look into it, especially in europe as far as I know they have better/more consumer rights over there.



stopstopp said:

If you are being ignorant enough to agree to a Terms of Agreement then defend breaking it and those who purposely go break it and pirate be my guest. A terms of agreement could say I own your soul and if you click agree you can't go and say that's not true, even though you agreed to it. Your "consumer rights" means nothing if you agree to it.


Thranx covered this but i would like to add to it and reinforce it. Many times EULAs and ToS agreements have illegal stipulations. In those cases either part or all of the EULA/ToS is completely nullified. In the case of the former it can get very bad as it gives all past customers completely free reign to do whatever they want. This is why you often don't see the court cases challenging them go very far. Few companies want to risk a worst case scenario that would truly fuck them hard in the backdoor sans lube.

 As an example, if the ToS were to say "By using this product you agree to do contract work for us at any time we desire for no compensation" then that would never hold up. You could try to enforce it, but the judge would quickly dismiss the case and laugh at you. In doing this the judge could also throw out legal parts such as you can't run third party cheat programs while playing online or something similar. This would be unlikely, but if the judge was in a bad mood, or the ToS were particularly assanine the option is there.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229