By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Graphic violence prevalent in HD games *another rant*

Mummelmann said:
Immortal said:

Okay, people really don't seem to get this; look at Wii's list of most popular games - you'll have to go to #8 to find Brawl, a game with fairly cartoonish violence rated T/12 and the first Mature game you'll find is Resident Evil 4, at #38, with not many more to follow. Now, looking at either PS3 or 360's lists, you'll find the most popular game to be MW2, a M/18 game with graphic violence and most of the other games are similarly violent.

If a kid goes to look for a game, he or she is far more likely to find a game inappropriate for his or her age on the PS3 or 360. And, honestly, being a kid myself, I know that most either disregard age ratings or are attracted to games simply because of a Mature or 18 label. When they own a PS3 or 360, their friends and Amazon will suggest CoD and they'll buy it, when they own a Wii, they'll be suggested NSMB and they'll buy it instead.

Oh, and Mummelmann, you're not seriously trying to justify violent behaviour by looking at worse stuff through the ages, are you? Sure, we can all say "oh, look, we used to have so much violence back then, a little terrorism today won't hurt", but that's a pathetic excuse. If something can be better, we might as well make it so.

Yes I am, people go on and on about how desintized we are to violence and makes it sound as if all kids are ticking time bombs ready to kill because they watch movies and play games. Where is this incredible violent behavior everyone is talking about? There were more brawls and upstarts fifty years ago when people had the balls to confront people and start shit alone. Its not a pathetic excuse, some people (especially from the US) make people sound like ravenous madmen whose minds are being destroyed by videogames and turning them into flesh hungry killing drones. This is gross polarization of arguments. One side claims that violence in games in not a big deal at all(I'm not one of those btw, like I've stated, kids should not play M rated or adult only games, its not the intended audience at all) and the other is basically saying that HD consoles are evil products that will taint your soul and drive you to murder or violent behavior. Blaming videogames is so easy, and parents who find their kid playing a game they shouldn't or watching a movie they shouldn't have a tendency to demonize the product itself and it's makers instead of accepting that they screwed up and aren't paying enough attention to the fact that their kids are getting hold of age inappropriate material.

As for the rest of your post;

1: The OP comes off as thinking that all HD games are violent and that those are the only kind of games you'll find on a 360/PS3

2: OP says he will refuse his kids to own a HD console for said reason, refer to my point about the DVD player; availablility of movies/games unsuited are a poor excuse to outright ban a product. He should also quickly dispose of his PC and/or smartphone.

3: Your point about being more likely to end up with an inappropriate game. Let me repeat myself; parents are responsible for what their kids are watching/playing and if kids own these games (they probably even buy them from the allowance the parents give them or the parents outright buy them for them) its the parents who are failing to do their job. See a game with an 18 year age limit? Don't buy it for your 10 year old, its not that hard.

4: Its not about whether the bestseller list has violent games or not on it, the OP seems to think that all HD games are violent and no Wii games are. By his logic, the Wii should not be in his house since you can get Madworld, No More Heroes, Call of Duty and lots of other violent games on it.

5: What do you have a against HD consoles? Almost all your posts seem to be another heavy step in some kind of crusade against them and their games. I haven't seen you utter a single positive word about either of them. Do you hate the PC as well? You should, it has even more violent games and unlimited access to the internet which has all kinds of twisted stuff ready for finding. It seems almost personal for you.

Why do I care about all this? Because I see yet another irrational argument put forth by a parent who would rather the world stopped presenting challenges in the form of things you have to watch to keep your children from harm (or possible harm anyway) and keeps chanting about things in black and white. Its the "videogames are making kids violent" debate all over again, only from a slightly different angle.

You must be reading it wrong or something; no one is trying to make it sound as if kids are becoming serial killers (not in this thread, at the very least). I, for one, am not saying that videogames lead to violence at all - they just desensitize them. Earlier, a teenager would cry at knowing someone who dies, now, they'd be used to it and would barely be able to sympathize. That's what I dislike about violent games, not it turning kids into time bombs. If you wanna argue against those who think that video games make kids evil and that HD consoles are made by the Devil, then I ask you to argue against them. I'm not arguing that at all. Oh, and sure, let's blame the parents. I don't disagree with that, but what difference will it make? Most of them whose children are getting ahold of this stuff simply don't care. I agree that it would be better if those parents would fix this, but they won't, and in that case, I feel that something should still be done about that which is having a negative effect on society (this in no way means boycotting the products, though).

1) He's not saying that, as far as I can tell. He says they are prevalent, that there are more of them and that they are more popular/successful on those consoles.

2) I admit I don't have any studies on this, but I'm pretty sure that the rate of kids getting inappropriate material for their age is higher on PS3/360 than it is on DVD players/PCs/Phones.

3) Well, considering how often kids do get this stuff, parents are either irresponsible or don't care. Either way, this is hurting society and, if the parents don't do anything about it, I really think some measures need to be taken.

4) Where does he say that every single game on HD is violent and no Wii game is? I only skimmed through the OP, but I didn't get that impression at all. He came off as saying "most" and "few" to me.

5) I'm not quite sure where you're getting this. Obviously, I dislike the HD consoles so I'm not gonna be singing jolly songs about them all the time, but I have given credit where credit is due. I seem to recall saying Kinect is selling well a lot of times, albeit most of the time, I was expressing this before posting a criticism of some sort. Almost every time when I've said something bad about a HD product, I've always said "it's selling well" at some point in the post because usually it is, but fans are trying to insinuate ridiculous things such as "lolol this is WAY ahead of expectations" or "UNDERTRACK!!!!".

By the way, the reason I don't like the HD consoles is because I do not enjoy or appreciate their software, not this. If this were the sole reason I do not enjoy them, I would absolutely detest PC. And, I'm sorry - I don't mean to be rude at all - but you seem far more personally affected by this than me. You gave me a huge paragraph and 5 separate points to respond to two small paragraphs.

You're even getting me heated up, :P. This is the first ":P" or "xD" I used to lighten the tone of the post, and I generally make them like once per sentence, :O. Even if you're getting tired of these arguments, you really don't need to vent your anger regarding similar arguments towards one. You're making too many stereotypes, I think.

Oh, and this post may have a huge amount of factual inaccuracies, hypocrisies, biased content and annoying rubbish in general. Don't blame me, :P, I was bored so I started writing this post then I got tired halfway through and just started writing whatever I felt like, :D.



 

“These are my principles; if you don’t like them, I have others.” – Groucho Marx

Around the Network

No worse than movies like Saw and the million horror movies out there. And it doesn't help that kids listen to rap either these days.



chocoloco said:
Mr Khan said:
Torillian said:

If you won't let your kids have a 360 or PS3 because of the violent games they could play why would you let them have a Wii when they could play Manhunt or Madworld?  Sure violent games are more prevalent on PS3/360 but there are games without violence just as there are games with violence on the Wii.  If you don't think you could keep your kids from playing the violent games on 360/PS3 what's to stop them playing the violent games on the Wii?

The main onus against PS3/360 in this case is that if you ask a given PS3/360 owner what makes owning the console worthwhile, they're going to name stuff like Gears, Killzone, Halo, Uncharted, etc. The top-tier HD games that are family appropriate, outside Kinect and Move stuff, is limited

Do you even own an HD system? Lets see there is flower, braid, castle crashers, soul calibur 4, marvel vs capcom 2, little big planet. motorstorm, motorstorm paciific rift, forza 3, GT5, mod nation racers, the sly collection, banjoo and kazooie nuts and bolts just to name a few. Some of these games have fighting, yet they have no blood and are rated teen or below. And many more soon to come out.

Never owned non-Nintendo and never will, but it's easy enough to see. I'm not saying those games are insignificant, but the games that really have people drooling over the HD systems are *usually* M-rated and violent. It goes with Nintendo as well, that even though there are violent games worth mentioning, it's not the root of the system's appeal, and generally not the kind of stuff system owners are clamoring for



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Not to be rude but will you not allow your children to watch television, movies, or even listen to the radio? Games aren't really doing anything different when compared to other media.



Wagram said:

Not to be rude but will you not allow your children to watch television, movies, or even listen to the radio? Games aren't really doing anything different when compared to other media.


Agreed. I wouldn't allow them to watch any movie, TV program, or mainstream music without my permission. There is so much garbage out there it's really unbelievable.



Around the Network

If you're concerned get a 360, it has good parental controls.



Tease.

In any Mario game, I am murdering  millions of henchmen who are being aggressively controlled by a tyrannical physcopathic monster who enjoys kidnapping young women and attempting to force them into marriage. Mario games are far to violent and sadistic and I will not allow my children to take joy in the murder of brainwashed turtles or give them the chance to view the tyrannical behaviour and shotgun weddings of Bowsers day to day lifestyle.

With the short amount of time that I've spent with a number of Pokemon games, I can confidently say that I am disgusted with how Nintendo has put educational tools of animal cruelty, child misbehaviour and atheist convertism into games that are primarily marketed to children. The promotion of evolutionary principles, the occult (Gengar, Haunter, hypnotism, mind reading and random magical occurrences) and extreme animal violence are off putting and it also encourages children to travel alone in a dangerous world filled with evil organisations and dangerous creatures.I do not want them to throw the family cats into battle with each other, I do not want them follow false ideologies (evolution/wicka), I do not want them to throw themselves into danger at such a young age and I do not want them to treat animals as possesions. I do not want my children to play Pokemon.

Kirby games glorify cannibalism, cross dressing and furry behaviour. I do not want any of this negative qualities put towards my children and that can only be achieved my avoiding Kirby games. I have no desire of letting my children watch a male blob (who is pink) dress up as a princess or a gorilla to satisfy his sexual fetishes. I also do not want cannibalism brought into my home and Nintendo's openness with Kirby consuming the flesh of his species is pretty disturbing.

Nintendo games are far to violent for my children and the ideologies they put into their games are ones that I cannot allow my children to view, hear or play. I have been disgusted with their output as of lately and so I will use other manufacturers as a source for my children's gaming needs. Medal of Honour takes a realistic approach to the hard fought war that our soldiers fight for ever day and it condemns violence and only shows the sacrifices that have to be made to help mankind. Little Big Planet takes a colourful approach to creation and it also invokes imagination, hard work and patience over unneeded violence and hostility. Flower encourages the fight for  freedom and promotes humbleness and a wider scope of a world view.

I will be purchasing my children's games from other publishers from now on. Most of them do not follow pot dream concepts. 



Bet with Conegamer and AussieGecko that the PS3 will have more exclusives in 2011 than the Wii or 360... or something.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

Mr Khan said:
chocoloco said:
Mr Khan said:
Torillian said:

If you won't let your kids have a 360 or PS3 because of the violent games they could play why would you let them have a Wii when they could play Manhunt or Madworld?  Sure violent games are more prevalent on PS3/360 but there are games without violence just as there are games with violence on the Wii.  If you don't think you could keep your kids from playing the violent games on 360/PS3 what's to stop them playing the violent games on the Wii?

The main onus against PS3/360 in this case is that if you ask a given PS3/360 owner what makes owning the console worthwhile, they're going to name stuff like Gears, Killzone, Halo, Uncharted, etc. The top-tier HD games that are family appropriate, outside Kinect and Move stuff, is limited

Do you even own an HD system? Lets see there is flower, braid, castle crashers, soul calibur 4, marvel vs capcom 2, little big planet. motorstorm, motorstorm paciific rift, forza 3, GT5, mod nation racers, the sly collection, banjoo and kazooie nuts and bolts just to name a few. Some of these games have fighting, yet they have no blood and are rated teen or below. And many more soon to come out.

Never owned non-Nintendo and never will, but it's easy enough to see. I'm not saying those games are insignificant, but the games that really have people drooling over the HD systems are *usually* M-rated and violent. It goes with Nintendo as well, that even though there are violent games worth mentioning, it's not the root of the system's appeal, and generally not the kind of stuff system owners are clamoring for

Does that really matter when the systems all offer experiences for people of all ages? I would agree with you, to state things I read a couple years back in game informer ( which is not fact but relivant) shows the average age of a Wii owner as 16, a 360 owner as 19 - 22 and the ps3 owner as 22-26. I say this because you want to claim the Wii is the most family friendly system well I certainly agree. I just think that there is little wonder that men between the ages of 18 and 35 prefer the violent videogames MS and Sony have to offer. They still have many games rated E and and child's games. but to claim all they have to offer is game for adults is ludicrous.



Yes those are the games that kids somehow get their hands on...



I don't mind violence in games, I just hate the idea that violence and gore makes a game better.  Or when people equate violence with 'maturity', surely it's 'immaturity'.