Annoyed, probably. Sarcastic, no. Less than completely serious as always, but not sarcastic.

I had always assumed it was because it was a quote and you were reproducing the misspelling on purpose. 

You're really making me work for this aren't you, Gniz? I have to reorganize my post because you don't care to respond to bolded typing within a quote.

Firstly, I would like (see? I said, "I would like". No demands here. If you feel you are above answering questions, then, well...there are consequences for that.)

...again, I would like to know in what context "without a lot of accuracy" you meant. As in, why use the word 'accuracy', specifically. What point are you trying to make? Simply throwing out criticisms without extrapolation or evidence concerns me. Are you implying that I'm misunderstanding things, or targeting the wrong people? Really, some clarification there would be appreciated.

I acknowledge that townies are chasing their own tails. There's nothing concrete in that discussion unless someone slips. I know that. Yet, I also feel that when stefl listed those 3 people and their recency it was aside from that discussion. It was  a seperate idea. I am confused about why you would point out the #Mafia discussion as a response to that individual idea. It doesn't appear relevant to me to say lurkers can lurk because there is no good discussion. A townie's purpose is to find mafia. A lurking townie cannot fulfil that role, and are additionally implicating themselves as lurking mafia. A lurking townie is a hazard, and I do not see how it is relevant when you give them a defense at the cost of insulting people who are actively playing, or trying to play, at the least.

Lastly, I did not vote out of revenge. I voted because I believe you are acting scummy. I believe that your response to stefl was scummy. I believe that your evasion is scummy.

If you don't answer this, I really don't know what else to do for your 'situation'. I'll have to just let it ride and wait 'til others ask for answers too.

I personally dislike replacements more than modkills for multiple reasons, which is why I made a point of including the "don't join if you're not going to play" disclaimer in the sign-up thread that hatmoza threw in last round.  Still, I'll take your sentiments under advisement, and welcome any other opinions. 

"my pressuring isn't random"
You won't recongnize this quote, but OH THAT IS SUCH A LIE

And you're saying that your play style is only really effective against noobs or hotheads?  Yeah, probably want to get yourself a new strategy. 

modkill please.

He's had enough of an impact that it's going to affect a lot of things if he's replaced by someone who plays completely differently. He's under scrutiny and I don't want this to be an escape, even if it is convenient to a bad schedule.

Later in the game replacements are obviously a hideous band-aid since you're dropping in a whole new person with prbably a different posting style and most observations by others may have to be thrown out the window or at least need complete reinterpretation when comparing with the replacement player's posts. 

But in the early part of the game, it's not so bad.  Specifically, on the first day, there's really not much reason not to replace anyone you can IMO. 

well, I only really just noticed it now :(

It's not entirely random. I shoot some random stuff out now and then, but I save the real pressuring for my targets. Shooting out little barbs or accusation here and there is usually just a build-up before I hit my real target. For instance...well, making someone think I don't suspect them by attacking their target with a few one liners or sometiems paragraphs, while gathering up a case against the person who I'm agreeing with.

Trust me, it's not ENTIRELY random, though it may sometimes seem that way.

One thing I would like from now on, is for replacements to happen instantaneously. People dropping out is such a distraction for me. GoW really shouldn't have posted that inside the thread.

I agree with zexen that it isn't earned if the dropout is scum, and it does feel underhanded, but I want to win. I really would rather prefer replacements simply "happening" from now on. example

discussion
discussion
discussion
Mod: here's gows replacement, dtewi
grumble grumble
discussion
discussion
discussion

rather than

discussion
gow needs to be replaced
discussion
should he be replaced?
discussion
modkill please
modkill
I frown on modkills
discussion
ad infinitum

lololol stefl, I'm so sorry

It was Silver Tiger that made that list the whole time. Oh gawrsh. sorry.