By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - NEW EU TREATY EU PRESIDENT!!!

konnichiwa said:
cAPSLOCK said:
konnichiwa said:
cAPSLOCK said:
kitler53 said:





Oh....Guns for hunting =/= Guns like Uzi's. I can just go to a gun store and buy a hunting gun I can understand that but I don't understand why people want a (example) Uzi for.

If you want to have one you can have one too but with conditions. I thought like going to a psychiater and he just will see if you have no mental problems and (not sure) if you are in a shooting club.

I don't know how it is in the USA or in the other EU countries.

Answer of your question: Of course you may have a gun if you are a hunter then it is not a problem at all.

But if you want something like a Uzi then I prefer that the government makes it difficult for you to get one (I prefer to make it very difficult than to make it to very easy) with all those accidents the last years (shooting on schools) it is better to make it difficult imo.

It is true that it is your government's job to protect your rights but it is also your government's job to protect the people and I think making it easy to get a gun is not a good thing.

And what is the difference of the bill of rights and uhm example the rights of the people in the UK?

I am pretty sure freedom of speech is the case in the most EU countries.


I think you should learn more about the laws of Europe(an countries).

ANd I think should learn more about yours.

Is this "and I think you should learn more about yours" or would you like to learn more about ours? Because let me tell you ...I'm your man if you want to learn about our laws. I know plenty about my constitution and the laws of the US. I'm a class, a paper, and a bar exam from arguing it in front of judges. Maybe even some day arguing in front of the Supreme Court. To be honest, I know it better than I want to. If anything studying the law has pretty much wrecked any shred of idealism I've had. Seeing how the system works from the inside is really, really depressing.

I agree with a lot of what you're saying in spirit, the parts I don't agree on I at least see and respect where you're coming from because they're both essentially reaching for the same goal--a better citizen.  

I'm not one to hold a grudge over it. Generally speaking from your posts I think you're someone worth respecting.  

I personally would rather there not be any drug laws, either. I don't do them, but if someone wants to ruin their life, I say let them.  They stem from the commerce clause here, making some really shakey logical jumps if that gives you an idea of what our founders thought of the government regulating the citizen's life. Same thing applies to me for gun laws. Again, I'm going under different set of presuppositions. I think people should be allowed to live their lives as they see fit without government regulation.

Bah, this has just spiraled out of control. It came from someone talking about the EU gobbling up the US, which will never happen anyway.  Primarily because of differences like these. To be honest this EU thing worries me  because philosophical differences between countries can cause problems. We had it with our Articles of Confederation over some really weird little things that just built up over time, ended up causing a civil war.

 



Around the Network
Erik Aston said:
I don't agree with him word for word, but cAPSLOCK has made the point.

I'm not so happy-go-lucky about America right now. We haven't been doing a good job of protecting and following the Constitution for the last century or so.

We've always done a great job protecting it from the Judicial side, which is where the end of the line generally is. 

L: Make the law

E: Enforce the law

J: Interpret the law 

It's those damn Executives and the Legislature that screw everything up!

:nerd rage:

:shakes fist in anger: 



cAPSLOCK said:
konnichiwa said:
cAPSLOCK said:
konnichiwa said:
cAPSLOCK said:
kitler53 said:





Oh....Guns for hunting =/= Guns like Uzi's. I can just go to a gun store and buy a hunting gun I can understand that but I don't understand why people want a (example) Uzi for.

If you want to have one you can have one too but with conditions. I thought like going to a psychiater and he just will see if you have no mental problems and (not sure) if you are in a shooting club.

I don't know how it is in the USA or in the other EU countries.

Answer of your question: Of course you may have a gun if you are a hunter then it is not a problem at all.

But if you want something like a Uzi then I prefer that the government makes it difficult for you to get one (I prefer to make it very difficult than to make it to very easy) with all those accidents the last years (shooting on schools) it is better to make it difficult imo.

It is true that it is your government's job to protect your rights but it is also your government's job to protect the people and I think making it easy to get a gun is not a good thing.

And what is the difference of the bill of rights and uhm example the rights of the people in the UK?

I am pretty sure freedom of speech is the case in the most EU countries.


I think you should learn more about the laws of Europe(an countries).

ANd I think should learn more about yours.

Is this "and I think you should learn more about yours" or would you like to learn more about ours? Because let me tell you ...I'm your man if you want to learn about our laws. I know plenty about my constitution and the laws of the US. I'm a class, a paper, and a bar exam from arguing it in front of judges. Maybe even some day arguing in front of the Supreme Court. To be honest, I know it better than I want to. If anything studying the law has pretty much wrecked any shred of idealism I've had. Seeing how the system works from the inside is really, really depressing.

I agree with a lot of what you're saying in spirit, the parts I don't agree on I at least see and respect where you're coming from because they're both essentially reaching for the same goal--a better citizen.  

I'm not one to hold a grudge over it. Generally speaking from your posts I think you're someone worth respecting.  

I personally would rather there not be any drug laws, either. I don't do them, but if someone wants to ruin their life, I say let them.  They stem from the commerce clause here, making some really shakey logical jumps if that gives you an idea of what our founders thought of the government regulating the citizen's life. Same thing applies to me for gun laws. Again, I'm going under different set of presuppositions. I think people should be allowed to live their lives as they see fit without government regulation.

Bah, this has just spiraled out of control. It came from someone talking about the EU gobbling up the US, which will never happen anyway.  Primarily because of differences like these. To be honest this EU thing worries me  because philosophical differences between countries can cause problems. We had it with our Articles of Confederation over some really weird little things that just built up over time, ended up causing a civil war.

 


 
Yeah I mean about your law (USA).

I really have the feeling that the bill of rights and the rights of the people in many EU countries is not a big difference, so far I don't know really a difference that is why I think I should read it.


And about the drugs law things like that will always have people who hate the law or love it.






For those who were curious about languages spoken around the world...

Most Commonly Spoken Languages
Rank Language Number of Speakers
1 Chinese (Mandarin) 1,000,000,000 +
2 English 508,000,000
3 Hindustani (Hindi and Urdu) 497,000,000
4 Spanish 392,000,000
5 Russian 277,000,000
6 Arabic 246,000,000
7 Bengali 211,000,000
8 Portuguese 191,000,000
9 Malay-Indonesian 159,000,000
10 French 129,000,000

Source: University of Washington



You do not have the right to never be offended.

konnichiwa said:
cAPSLOCK said:
konnichiwa said:
cAPSLOCK said:
konnichiwa said:
cAPSLOCK said:
kitler53 said:






 



Yeah I mean about your law (USA).

I really have the feeling that the bill of rights and the rights of the people in many EU countries is not a big difference, so far I don't know really a difference that is why I think I should read it.


And about the drugs law things like that will always have people who hate the law or love it.

 

Therein lies the tricky part.  Differences, even here from state to state, can be very subtle but the differences can be significant. Country to country can be even bigger because different words or different grammatical rules can totally change the meaning of two seeminly identical statutes. If you're interested, start with the US  Constitution. It's surprisingly small, but also very dense as legal language (especially something like a Constitution) has to be very precise yet flexible. 

I'll be gone for a couple weeks starting Saturday, but if you have any questions, feel free to message me. 

If you're curious about the reasoning behind it, I'm sure somewhere online is John Stuart Mill's political philosophy writing "On Liberty" you can read for free. It was written after our Constitution, but it's very close to our founders way of thinking, and American political thought in general. 

Actually, here's a quick and dirty notes version of On Liberty:  

http://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/onliberty/

It's a fascinating insight into the libertarian perspective.  

US Constitution

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.overview.html

I'd link the legal history, but I don't think there's enough room on the internet. Seriously, it's a billion books that are a billion pages each. 

I'm going to go hunt for European founding documents, it'll give me something to do over this year break coming up.

Also, does anyone have this new EU treaty, is it up on the internet yet? 



Around the Network
famousringo said:
Bursche said:
StanGable said:
If you are a true Christian then you'll know this is bad. Its sad to know that the beginning of the end of world is being led by Europe with their move to one monetary unit and now the union of all these countries. :(

This isnt the left behind series. Revelations could end up that way, but that is one of MILLIONS of possibilities Revelations can be interpreted.

 

I believe this to be bad. EU is fine as an economic unity, but once it starts to become political, there will be a lot of controversy. Who is to decide what makes up what? Will new boundaries be made, creating each nation as a state or will it be a confederacy of sorts? And how will a new President be elected and will resentment happen if a German is picked over a Frenchman, or an Italian, or whatever. I dont see this as plausible and could very well just lead to an internal conflict. Europe doesnt exactly have the best record of inter-European relations.

 


I assume you're referring to the World Wars and the centuries of relatively low-key conflicts that preceeded it.

I would hardly call Napoleon's attempted conquest of Europe low key ;)

 



ChichiriMuyo said:
For those who were curious about languages spoken around the world...

Most Commonly Spoken Languages
Rank Language Number of Speakers
1 Chinese (Mandarin) 1,000,000,000 +
2 English 508,000,000
3 Hindustani (Hindi and Urdu) 497,000,000
4 Spanish 392,000,000
5 Russian 277,000,000
6 Arabic 246,000,000
7 Bengali 211,000,000
8 Portuguese 191,000,000
9 Malay-Indonesian 159,000,000
10 French 129,000,000

Source: University of Washington
Is that native speakers only or does it include second language?

 



phil said:
famousringo said:
 

I assume you're referring to the World Wars and the centuries of relatively low-key conflicts that preceeded it.

I would hardly call Napoleon's attempted conquest of Europe low key ;)

 


Compared to 20th-century total war, everything is low-key. 



"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event."  — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.

phil said:
ChichiriMuyo said:
For those who were curious about languages spoken around the world...

Most Commonly Spoken Languages
Rank Language Number of Speakers
1 Chinese (Mandarin) 1,000,000,000 +
2 English 508,000,000
3 Hindustani (Hindi and Urdu) 497,000,000
4 Spanish 392,000,000
5 Russian 277,000,000
6 Arabic 246,000,000
7 Bengali 211,000,000
8 Portuguese 191,000,000
9 Malay-Indonesian 159,000,000
10 French 129,000,000

Source: University of Washington
Is that native speakers only or does it include second language?

 


 I think it's native only. Just US + UK + Canada makes about 400 million anglos. That's ignoring several other countries where english is a primary or significant language.

These numbers might only be fluent speakers. 500 million fluent english speakers seems plausible, but I think there are many more people who speak english with less skill. 



"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event."  — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.

phil said:
ChichiriMuyo said:
For those who were curious about languages spoken around the world...

Most Commonly Spoken Languages
Rank Language Number of Speakers
1 Chinese (Mandarin) 1,000,000,000 +
2 English 508,000,000
3 Hindustani (Hindi and Urdu) 497,000,000
4 Spanish 392,000,000
5 Russian 277,000,000
6 Arabic 246,000,000
7 Bengali 211,000,000
8 Portuguese 191,000,000
9 Malay-Indonesian 159,000,000
10 French 129,000,000

Source: University of Washington
Is that native speakers only or does it include second language?

 


 Native for sure... I speak three languages  of the top ten woohaa! ( I want four though).

@cAPSLOCK THANKS.  I will read it tomorow thought it is already morning here I need to read it.

I think you can find the EU treaty on the European Union site...Somewhere.