By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Anonymous Supports Wikileaks as Assange is Arrested

Apologies for breaking rules one and two, but this needs to be posted.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11935539

Wikileaks defended by Anonymous hacktivists

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has been arrested by UK police

Related stories

Internet hacktivists have fired the latest salvo in the Wikileaks infowar.

A group called Anonymous has hit sites that have refused to do business with the controversial whistle-blowing site with a series of distributed denial-of-service attacks.

It mirrors similar attacks aimed at the Wikileaks site.

Targets include the Swiss bank that froze founder Julian Assange's assets and PayPal which has stopped processing donations to Wikileaks.

Anonymous is a loose-knit group of hacktivists, with links to the notorious message board 4chan.

Increased traffic

A member of Anonymous who calls himself Coldblood told the BBC that "multiple things are being done".

"Websites that are bowing down to government pressure have become targets," he said.

"As an organisation we have always taken a strong stance on censorship and freedom of expression on the internet and come out against those who seek to destroy it by any means."

"We feel that Wikileaks has become more than just about leaking of documents, it has become a war ground, the people vs. the government," he said.

So far the denial-of-service attacks (DDoS), which swamp a site with so many requests that it becomes overwhelmed, have failed to take any sites offline although that is not the point of the attack, according to Coldblood.

"The idea is not to wipe them off but to give the companies a wake-up call," he said. "Companies will notice the increase in traffic and an increase in traffic means increase in costs associated with running a website."

DDoS attacks are illegal in many countries, including the UK.

Coldblood admitted that such attacks "may hurt people trying to get to these sites" but said it was "the only effective way to tell these companies that us, the people, are displeased".

Anonymous is also helping to create hundreds of mirror sites for Wikileaks, after its US domain name provider withdrew its services.

"At the last count there were 507 mirrors of Wikileaks," said Coldblood.

Ending contracts

Wikileaks has been hit by a series of denial-of-service attacks, following the release of a quarter of a million US embassy cables.

Game of cat-and-mouse

  • 28 Nov: First cables released
  • 29 Nov: US brands cable leaks an "attack on the international community" and says criminal investigation ongoing
  • 29 Nov: Former US vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin calls for Mr Assange to be "pursued with the same urgency we pursue al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders"
  • 3 Dec: Wikileaks forced to change web address after coming under cyber attack
  • 3 Dec: Sweden issues new European arrest warrant for Mr Assange over sex crime allegations but wording is wrong
  • 6 Dec: Sweden issues new warrant and passes it to police in UK
  • 7 Dec: Mr Assange is arrested in London after voluntarily walking into a police station

It is unclear who is behind the attacks but it seems that Wikileaks is getting too hot to handle as many of the businesses that work with the site, distance themselves from it.

On 3 December, domain name provider EveryDNS cut off service, citing the denial-of-service attacks as the reason.

Amazon also ended an agreement to host the site, saying Wikileaks failed to adhere to its terms of service.

It said that Wikileaks was unable to ensure that it "wasn't putting innocent people in jeopardy" by leaking classified documents.

Online payment company, PayPal, has permanently restricted Wikileaks' account, making it harder for supporters to make donations.

MasterCard Worldwide is also choking payments to the site.

The Swiss bank, PostFinance has closed the account of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.

In all cases, the companies have insisted their decisions are not politically motivated.

PayPal said Wikileaks' account had violated its terms of services.

PostFinance, meanwhile, claimed Assange had provided false information when opening his account.

BitTorrent file

But some have taken a different view.

French internet service provider OVH said it had no plans to end the service it provides to Wikileaks.

Start Quote

The information is already out there”

End Quote Joss Wright Oxford Internet Institute

"OVH is neither for nor against this site. We neither asked to host this site nor not to host it. Now it's with us, we will fulfil the contract," said OVH managing director Octave Klaba.

"It's neither for the political world nor for OVH to call for or to decide on a site's closure," he added.

French industry minister Eric Besson had called for the site to be shut down, saying France could not host internet sites that "violate the confidentiality of diplomatic relations and put in danger people protected by diplomatic secrecy".

But on 6 December, a French judge declined to force OVH to shut Wikileaks down, saying the case needed further argument.

Wikileaks has amassed some high-profile enemies including Senator Joe Lieberman, who chairs the US Homeland Security Committee.

He has urged the US government to "use all legal means necessary to shut down Wikileaks before it can do more damage by releasing additional cables".

Dr Joss Wright, a research fellow at the Oxford Internet Institute thinks it could be too late to legislate Wikileaks offline.

"Wikileaks has released an encrypted file containing all of the embassy cables," says Dr Wright. "The information is already out there."

Dozens of copies of that encrypted file have been shared using peer-to-peer networks, such as BitTorrent. "Once the information is there, it's virtually impossible to stop people sharing it," said Dr Wright.

Founder of Wikileaks Julian Assange has been arrested and is due to appear at City of Westminster Magistrates' Court later.

He is accused by the Swedish authorities of sexual assault.



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective

Around the Network

Wow.  You really don't want to get on the wrong side of the US government.

Shame on those government officials who are being so afraid of the people knowing all about it's dirty, subversive wars across the globe and trying to take the people's right to know away.

Long live, Wikileaks!



That is pretty convenient for America >.>



"Life is but a gentle death. Fate is but a sickness that results in extinction and in the midst of all the uncertainty, lies resolve."

So, they are illegally hacking websites that have exercised their legal right to choose who they do buisness with, because someone got arrested for a rape charge that will only help him and his cause.

Not sure i'm getting the why.

 

Also, why are they saying they don't know who committed the Cyberattacks?  Some guy claimed responsibility for those.

 

The rape charges are completely unrelated, I mean they do nothing but hurt the US since everyone thinks it's behind it anyway.  Don't think the government is that stupid.



Kasz216 said:

So, they are illegally hacking websites that have exercised their legal right to choose who they do buisness with, because someone got arrested for a rape charge that will only help him and his cause.

Not sure i'm getting the why.

You mean illegally hacking websites from companies that have illegally canceled contracts because of U.S. pressure?

Long Live Wikileaks!



Around the Network
Kasz216 said:

So, they are illegally hacking websites that have exercised their legal right to choose who they do buisness with, because someone got arrested for a rape charge that will only help him and his cause.

Not sure i'm getting the why.

You mean illegally hacking websites from companies that have illegally canceled contracts because of U.S. pressure?

Long Live Wikileaks!



shio said:
Kasz216 said:

So, they are illegally hacking websites that have exercised their legal right to choose who they do buisness with, because someone got arrested for a rape charge that will only help him and his cause.

Not sure i'm getting the why.

You mean illegally hacking websites from companies that have illegally canceled contracts because of U.S. pressure?

Long Live Wikileaks!

Except, they didn't?  They legally terminated them.  Haven't you ever read a TOS before "The company reserves the right to terminate your service at any time for any reason."

Check the Steam TOS for example.   Steam can decide to cancel your steam account and invalidate all your games because they picked your name out of a hat.

They themselvses by this action are acting AGAINST freedom of expression by trying to tell these people who they should work with.



Kasz216 said:

So, they are illegally hacking websites that have exercised their legal right to choose who they do buisness with, because someone got arrested for a rape charge that will only help him and his cause.

Not sure i'm getting the why.

 

Also, why are they saying they don't know who committed the Cyberattacks?  Some guy claimed responsibility for those.

 

The rape charges are completely unrelated, I mean they do nothing but hurt the US since everyone thinks it's behind it anyway.  Don't think the government is that stupid.

It's extremely naïve to assume that Assange just happened to have a rape case filed against him after he published and shared leaked confidential information (which, incidentally, is not a crime).



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective

Kasz216 said:
shio said:
Kasz216 said:

So, they are illegally hacking websites that have exercised their legal right to choose who they do buisness with, because someone got arrested for a rape charge that will only help him and his cause.

Not sure i'm getting the why.

You mean illegally hacking websites from companies that have illegally canceled contracts because of U.S. pressure?

Long Live Wikileaks!

Except, they didn't?  They legally terminated them.  Haven't you ever read a TOS before "The company reserves the right to terminate your service at any time for any reason."

Check the Steam TOS for example.   Steam can decide to cancel your steam account and invalidate all your games because they picked your name out of a hat.

Some of them are backing their decisions by claiming that Wikileaks is involved in illegal affairs, with is false. Wikileaks and Assange will surely win against them in court.



Kantor said:
Kasz216 said:

So, they are illegally hacking websites that have exercised their legal right to choose who they do buisness with, because someone got arrested for a rape charge that will only help him and his cause.

Not sure i'm getting the why.

 

Also, why are they saying they don't know who committed the Cyberattacks?  Some guy claimed responsibility for those.

 

The rape charges are completely unrelated, I mean they do nothing but hurt the US since everyone thinks it's behind it anyway.  Don't think the government is that stupid.

It's extremely naïve to assume that Assange just happened to have a rape case filed against him after he published and shared leaked confidential information (which, incidentally, is not a crime).

A) Didn't the original case start BEFORE these leaks?

B) I see a connection, just not a crazy conspiracy theorist connection when there is literally zero benefit towards this conspiracy theory for the US or Sweeden.

Ever think that the leaks make him more famous, therefore more likely to get people to date him, and put him in a better chance to alledgedly aquatience rape people?

I mean, that's like saying you find it Naive that Tiger woods just happened to start cheating on his wife after he got famous.

Or that Ben Rothelesburger just started happened trapping women in bathrooms after he became successful.