By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - GT5 graphics aren't that impressive

jhuff394 said:

I don't think people realize the amount of polygons and algorithms, and mathmatical processing power is going into the calculations of lighting reflecting of the car and window and bouncing between this and that...  and the raindrops that were made to be calculated to the most unbelievable realism with movement of the car....not to mention the most sophisticated physics engine yet (requiring tens of thousands of calculations).... These each take up some ps3 power.

Given the fact that the creator knows people love gt5 for its cars... they put almost too much effort and detail into the cars....They spent perhaps too much time emphasizing on these small accuracies of these cars... whereas less attention went to the environment and other aspects of the game...The spread of processing power, if created by other game companies, could be different between all of them... this creator focused on realistic cars, realistic driving.

This seems to be the main, arguable issue with this game... the  uneven spread of attention, to all aspects of the game.

that being said... playing on a 1080p, good brand television... This is the most realistic, accurate driving simulation to date.

http://i365.photobucket.com/albums/oo96/metal-matt/HA_HA_HA_OH_WOW.jpg&t=1" width="255" height="198">

There are several racing sims on PC that are far better simulators then GT5. And I'm not talking about a slightly better physics engine, but a physic engine that simulates the cars frame, the effect of torque on the drive shaft, tyre deformation, ect. GT5 may be the most realistic on consoles (Forza is close if not better), but the most realistic racing sim ever? Not by a long shot.



Leo-j said: If a dvd for a pc game holds what? Crysis at 3000p or something, why in the world cant a blu-ray disc do the same?

ssj12 said: Player specific decoders are nothing more than specialized GPUs. Gran Turismo is the trust driving simulator of them all. 

"Why do they call it the xbox 360? Because when you see it, you'll turn 360 degrees and walk away" 

Around the Network
CGI-Quality said:
themanwithnoname said:
CGI-Quality said:
nightsurge said:
Blue3 said:
kowenicki said:
Blue3 said:
kowenicki said:
Blue3 said:

Better then GT5p check.

Better then its competitiors check.

 

Iv yet to play on half the track, ill see if some are better then others.   But right now i see liitle to complain about, then again im judging form playing the game not going out of my way to find a fault. 


Played Forza to death then have you?  I have played both and there is nothing in it, there really isnt.


Nothing what ?

From a racing perspective GT5 kills forza bud, though yes sure from a oh looks its pretty Forza is close to it.  To me Forza is for ricers types, GT is for automotive enthusiasts. 

Its incredable that GT5 can make me feel simlar vibes that i feel when screwing around in my car in a empty wet parking lot. 

arrogant much?

what makes you think I am not an automotive enthusiast... list the cars you've owned.. then I will list mine... 

sensetive much.

Forza lovers love their big wings body kits and custom graphins, to Gt fans and automotive enthusiast that is useless and pointless. 

You can own a Ferrari and rice it out.  Car you own means nothing, what you do with it means everything. 

So now you are trying to generalize the term automotive enthusiast to mean just people who only care about the engine/gears/suspension/etc?

Poor thing.

The fact is, though, that GT5 was touted to be better than Forza 3 in graphics by a wide margin, which it simply isn't.  In fact it is downright uglier than Forza 3 in quite a few spots because at least Forza's level of graphics is pretty consistant throughout.  I'd rather have consistant quality over the quantity that GT5 has.

Other things, such as customization, damage, physics, sound, environments, are all better on Forza 3...  Quantity and the ability to look like real life was basically GT5's only trump card and it just didn't hold up to expectations it seems.

As a driving sim, however, it's touted as the best there is (which was really  it's main objective). Looking pretty and sounding the best should all be bonuses (which from what I gather, the sound problems are mainly tailored to the soundtrack). I admit Sony ran their mouths a bit too much and made some poor business decisions, but Forza 3 didn't have has many nitpickers and doesn't have the hype/legacy of Gran Turismo, thus GT will be scrutinized far more (think Halo vs Killzone).

Let's also remember that Forza 3 has far less going on, isn't in 1080p, and doesn't offer the same amount of content. I'd personally take the total meal over the appetizer if they are as comparable as Forza and GT are (and this isn't to slight it).

Yeah, I don't see how that could possibly be taken as a slight at all. /sarcasm

I hit level 50 in FM3 and have put at least 40 hours in it and have probably only done like 30% of the events. Deeming it an "appetizer" in any way is nothing short of ridiculous.

Of course you'd take anything that is even a tad against anything 360 as a way to attack it. You missed the point entirely.

The fact that it's on the 360 is irrelevant. I've played FM3 quite extensively and calling it that is an attempt to diminish what it is, especially considering it has more tracks, locations, and fully modelled cars than GT5 does. Now, go ahead and explain that comparison.



themanwithnoname's law: As an America's sales or NPD thread grows longer, the probabilty of the comment "America = World" [sarcasticly] being made approaches 1.

Scoobes said:

The important stuff (premium cars, track etc.) look good. You've got to remember this game needs to run at 1080P, 60 fps and with up to 16 cars on the track. Some of the background textures could be improved and some anti-alising on the shadows would go a long way, but when racing you really don't notice. Haven't tried out a wet race yet so can't comment on that.


GT5 is 1280X1080P native and can drop well below 60FPS at times.



CGI-Quality said:
themanwithnoname said:
CGI-Quality said:
nightsurge said:
Blue3 said:
kowenicki said:
Blue3 said:
kowenicki said:
Blue3 said:

Better then GT5p check.

Better then its competitiors check.

 

Iv yet to play on half the track, ill see if some are better then others.   But right now i see liitle to complain about, then again im judging form playing the game not going out of my way to find a fault. 


Played Forza to death then have you?  I have played both and there is nothing in it, there really isnt.


Nothing what ?

From a racing perspective GT5 kills forza bud, though yes sure from a oh looks its pretty Forza is close to it.  To me Forza is for ricers types, GT is for automotive enthusiasts. 

Its incredable that GT5 can make me feel simlar vibes that i feel when screwing around in my car in a empty wet parking lot. 

arrogant much?

what makes you think I am not an automotive enthusiast... list the cars you've owned.. then I will list mine... 

sensetive much.

Forza lovers love their big wings body kits and custom graphins, to Gt fans and automotive enthusiast that is useless and pointless. 

You can own a Ferrari and rice it out.  Car you own means nothing, what you do with it means everything. 

So now you are trying to generalize the term automotive enthusiast to mean just people who only care about the engine/gears/suspension/etc?

Poor thing.

The fact is, though, that GT5 was touted to be better than Forza 3 in graphics by a wide margin, which it simply isn't.  In fact it is downright uglier than Forza 3 in quite a few spots because at least Forza's level of graphics is pretty consistant throughout.  I'd rather have consistant quality over the quantity that GT5 has.

Other things, such as customization, damage, physics, sound, environments, are all better on Forza 3...  Quantity and the ability to look like real life was basically GT5's only trump card and it just didn't hold up to expectations it seems.

As a driving sim, however, it's touted as the best there is (which was really  it's main objective). Looking pretty and sounding the best should all be bonuses (which from what I gather, the sound problems are mainly tailored to the soundtrack). I admit Sony ran their mouths a bit too much and made some poor business decisions, but Forza 3 didn't have has many nitpickers and doesn't have the hype/legacy of Gran Turismo, thus GT will be scrutinized far more (think Halo vs Killzone).

Let's also remember that Forza 3 has far less going on, isn't in 1080p, and doesn't offer the same amount of content. I'd personally take the total meal over the appetizer if they are as comparable as Forza and GT are (and this isn't to slight it).

Yeah, I don't see how that could possibly be taken as a slight at all. /sarcasm

I hit level 50 in FM3 and have put at least 40 hours in it and have probably only done like 30% of the events. Deeming it an "appetizer" in any way is nothing short of ridiculous.

Of course you'd take anything that is even a tad against anything 360 as a way to attack it. Relax bro, I own a 360 and don't look to hate on it. In this case, however, I prefer the package offered in GT5, and I used to own Forza 3. I didn't dislike it, I just know what I'm getting in GT5 has more to offer my $60. Whether it's "better" or not remains to be determined.

NO YOU ARE WRONG CGI! XBOX 360 FOR LIFE!!!!!!!!!!! RAWRWARARRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FROZA3 IS THE BESTESTZ! YOU ARE WRONGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!

 



wait just one minute? one cotton picking minute! isn't there a patch for that?



Around the Network

I don't think people realize the amount of polygons and algorithms, and mathmatical processing power is going into the calculations of lighting reflecting of the car and window and bouncing between this and that...  and the raindrops that were made to be calculated to the most unbelievable realism with movement of the car....not to mention the most sophisticated physics engine yet (requiring tens of thousands of calculations).... These each take up some ps3 power.

Given the fact that the creator knows people love gt5 for its cars... they put almost too much effort and detail into the cars....They spent perhaps too much time emphasizing on these small accuracies of these cars... whereas less attention went to the environment and other aspects of the game...The spread of processing power, if created by other game companies, could be different between all of them... this creator focused on realistic cars, realistic driving.

This seems to be the main, arguable issue with this game... the  uneven spread of attention, to all aspects of the game.

that being said... playing on a 1080p, good brand television... This is the most realistic, accurate driving simulation to date.



“Absolutely, we can do much more with it. I don’t know if we are even close to 50 percent of PlayStation 3’s power at this point,” said Asmussen about God of War 3.

ARE YOU KIDDING ME???

themanwithnoname said:
CGI-Quality said:
themanwithnoname said:
CGI-Quality said:
nightsurge said:
Blue3 said:
kowenicki said:
Blue3 said:
kowenicki said:
Blue3 said:

Better then GT5p check.

Better then its competitiors check.

 

Iv yet to play on half the track, ill see if some are better then others.   But right now i see liitle to complain about, then again im judging form playing the game not going out of my way to find a fault. 


Played Forza to death then have you?  I have played both and there is nothing in it, there really isnt.


Nothing what ?

From a racing perspective GT5 kills forza bud, though yes sure from a oh looks its pretty Forza is close to it.  To me Forza is for ricers types, GT is for automotive enthusiasts. 

Its incredable that GT5 can make me feel simlar vibes that i feel when screwing around in my car in a empty wet parking lot. 

arrogant much?

what makes you think I am not an automotive enthusiast... list the cars you've owned.. then I will list mine... 

sensetive much.

Forza lovers love their big wings body kits and custom graphins, to Gt fans and automotive enthusiast that is useless and pointless. 

You can own a Ferrari and rice it out.  Car you own means nothing, what you do with it means everything. 

So now you are trying to generalize the term automotive enthusiast to mean just people who only care about the engine/gears/suspension/etc?

Poor thing.

The fact is, though, that GT5 was touted to be better than Forza 3 in graphics by a wide margin, which it simply isn't.  In fact it is downright uglier than Forza 3 in quite a few spots because at least Forza's level of graphics is pretty consistant throughout.  I'd rather have consistant quality over the quantity that GT5 has.

Other things, such as customization, damage, physics, sound, environments, are all better on Forza 3...  Quantity and the ability to look like real life was basically GT5's only trump card and it just didn't hold up to expectations it seems.

As a driving sim, however, it's touted as the best there is (which was really  it's main objective). Looking pretty and sounding the best should all be bonuses (which from what I gather, the sound problems are mainly tailored to the soundtrack). I admit Sony ran their mouths a bit too much and made some poor business decisions, but Forza 3 didn't have has many nitpickers and doesn't have the hype/legacy of Gran Turismo, thus GT will be scrutinized far more (think Halo vs Killzone).

Let's also remember that Forza 3 has far less going on, isn't in 1080p, and doesn't offer the same amount of content. I'd personally take the total meal over the appetizer if they are as comparable as Forza and GT are (and this isn't to slight it).

Yeah, I don't see how that could possibly be taken as a slight at all. /sarcasm

I hit level 50 in FM3 and have put at least 40 hours in it and have probably only done like 30% of the events. Deeming it an "appetizer" in any way is nothing short of ridiculous.

Of course you'd take anything that is even a tad against anything 360 as a way to attack it. You missed the point entirely.

The fact that it's on the 360 is irrelevant. I've played FM3 quite extensively and calling it that is an attempt to diminish what it is, especially considering it has more tracks, locations, and fully modelled cars than GT5 does. Now, go ahead and explain that comparison.


does forza3 have a track editor? /scratchs head

don't even know what you mean by fully modeled cars, you will need to explain that one.



dahuman said:
themanwithnoname said:
CGI-Quality said:
themanwithnoname said:
CGI-Quality said:
nightsurge said:
Blue3 said:
kowenicki said:
Blue3 said:
kowenicki said:
Blue3 said:

Better then GT5p check.

Better then its competitiors check.

 

Iv yet to play on half the track, ill see if some are better then others.   But right now i see liitle to complain about, then again im judging form playing the game not going out of my way to find a fault. 


Played Forza to death then have you?  I have played both and there is nothing in it, there really isnt.


Nothing what ?

From a racing perspective GT5 kills forza bud, though yes sure from a oh looks its pretty Forza is close to it.  To me Forza is for ricers types, GT is for automotive enthusiasts. 

Its incredable that GT5 can make me feel simlar vibes that i feel when screwing around in my car in a empty wet parking lot. 

arrogant much?

what makes you think I am not an automotive enthusiast... list the cars you've owned.. then I will list mine... 

sensetive much.

Forza lovers love their big wings body kits and custom graphins, to Gt fans and automotive enthusiast that is useless and pointless. 

You can own a Ferrari and rice it out.  Car you own means nothing, what you do with it means everything. 

So now you are trying to generalize the term automotive enthusiast to mean just people who only care about the engine/gears/suspension/etc?

Poor thing.

The fact is, though, that GT5 was touted to be better than Forza 3 in graphics by a wide margin, which it simply isn't.  In fact it is downright uglier than Forza 3 in quite a few spots because at least Forza's level of graphics is pretty consistant throughout.  I'd rather have consistant quality over the quantity that GT5 has.

Other things, such as customization, damage, physics, sound, environments, are all better on Forza 3...  Quantity and the ability to look like real life was basically GT5's only trump card and it just didn't hold up to expectations it seems.

As a driving sim, however, it's touted as the best there is (which was really  it's main objective). Looking pretty and sounding the best should all be bonuses (which from what I gather, the sound problems are mainly tailored to the soundtrack). I admit Sony ran their mouths a bit too much and made some poor business decisions, but Forza 3 didn't have has many nitpickers and doesn't have the hype/legacy of Gran Turismo, thus GT will be scrutinized far more (think Halo vs Killzone).

Let's also remember that Forza 3 has far less going on, isn't in 1080p, and doesn't offer the same amount of content. I'd personally take the total meal over the appetizer if they are as comparable as Forza and GT are (and this isn't to slight it).

Yeah, I don't see how that could possibly be taken as a slight at all. /sarcasm

I hit level 50 in FM3 and have put at least 40 hours in it and have probably only done like 30% of the events. Deeming it an "appetizer" in any way is nothing short of ridiculous.

Of course you'd take anything that is even a tad against anything 360 as a way to attack it. You missed the point entirely.

The fact that it's on the 360 is irrelevant. I've played FM3 quite extensively and calling it that is an attempt to diminish what it is, especially considering it has more tracks, locations, and fully modelled cars than GT5 does. Now, go ahead and explain that comparison.


does forza3 have a track editor? /scratchs head

don't even know what you mean by fully modeled cars, you will need to explain that one.

GT5 has 200 'premium' cars, which have detailed car models, interiors, and the ability to modify the cars. The rest are 'standard' and have lower detail models (most of them being the same model as gt4), they lack interiors, damage and the ability to modify/upgrade them.



Leo-j said: If a dvd for a pc game holds what? Crysis at 3000p or something, why in the world cant a blu-ray disc do the same?

ssj12 said: Player specific decoders are nothing more than specialized GPUs. Gran Turismo is the trust driving simulator of them all. 

"Why do they call it the xbox 360? Because when you see it, you'll turn 360 degrees and walk away" 

sieanr said:
dahuman said:
themanwithnoname said:
CGI-Quality said:
themanwithnoname said:
CGI-Quality said:
nightsurge said:
Blue3 said:
kowenicki said:
Blue3 said:
kowenicki said:
Blue3 said:

Better then GT5p check.

Better then its competitiors check.

 

Iv yet to play on half the track, ill see if some are better then others.   But right now i see liitle to complain about, then again im judging form playing the game not going out of my way to find a fault. 


Played Forza to death then have you?  I have played both and there is nothing in it, there really isnt.


Nothing what ?

From a racing perspective GT5 kills forza bud, though yes sure from a oh looks its pretty Forza is close to it.  To me Forza is for ricers types, GT is for automotive enthusiasts. 

Its incredable that GT5 can make me feel simlar vibes that i feel when screwing around in my car in a empty wet parking lot. 

arrogant much?

what makes you think I am not an automotive enthusiast... list the cars you've owned.. then I will list mine... 

sensetive much.

Forza lovers love their big wings body kits and custom graphins, to Gt fans and automotive enthusiast that is useless and pointless. 

You can own a Ferrari and rice it out.  Car you own means nothing, what you do with it means everything. 

So now you are trying to generalize the term automotive enthusiast to mean just people who only care about the engine/gears/suspension/etc?

Poor thing.

The fact is, though, that GT5 was touted to be better than Forza 3 in graphics by a wide margin, which it simply isn't.  In fact it is downright uglier than Forza 3 in quite a few spots because at least Forza's level of graphics is pretty consistant throughout.  I'd rather have consistant quality over the quantity that GT5 has.

Other things, such as customization, damage, physics, sound, environments, are all better on Forza 3...  Quantity and the ability to look like real life was basically GT5's only trump card and it just didn't hold up to expectations it seems.

As a driving sim, however, it's touted as the best there is (which was really  it's main objective). Looking pretty and sounding the best should all be bonuses (which from what I gather, the sound problems are mainly tailored to the soundtrack). I admit Sony ran their mouths a bit too much and made some poor business decisions, but Forza 3 didn't have has many nitpickers and doesn't have the hype/legacy of Gran Turismo, thus GT will be scrutinized far more (think Halo vs Killzone).

Let's also remember that Forza 3 has far less going on, isn't in 1080p, and doesn't offer the same amount of content. I'd personally take the total meal over the appetizer if they are as comparable as Forza and GT are (and this isn't to slight it).

Yeah, I don't see how that could possibly be taken as a slight at all. /sarcasm

I hit level 50 in FM3 and have put at least 40 hours in it and have probably only done like 30% of the events. Deeming it an "appetizer" in any way is nothing short of ridiculous.

Of course you'd take anything that is even a tad against anything 360 as a way to attack it. You missed the point entirely.

The fact that it's on the 360 is irrelevant. I've played FM3 quite extensively and calling it that is an attempt to diminish what it is, especially considering it has more tracks, locations, and fully modelled cars than GT5 does. Now, go ahead and explain that comparison.


does forza3 have a track editor? /scratchs head

don't even know what you mean by fully modeled cars, you will need to explain that one.

GT5 has 200 'premium' cars, which have detailed car models, interiors, and the ability to modify the cars. The rest are 'standard' and have lower detail models (most of them being the same model as gt4), they lack interiors, damage and the ability to modify/upgrade them.

Sorry, Can I correct you there, you can upgrade the standard cars. The upgrades affect the performance of the car as well.



PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.


Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?

Forza 3 cockpit view didn't look that great. Yet GT5  looks better than a lot of PC sims.

I personally didn't like Forza 3 paint flying off damage. I'll rather it was left out.

 We knew last year Forza3 put more effort into track graphics and GT5 more into cars.