By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Sony and Microsoft will join forces within the next 10 - 15 years

Squilliam said:

Its a penis length / hand size issue. The smaller the hands the more time available to spend playing with yourself.

 

 

 

So it's a big o'stroke fest we have going on. I have a video for that.

 

No it's not a porno you perves.

 

watch and find out.

 

 

 

http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/george-carlin-hbo-special-2008-its-bad-for-ya/62b73597599f1eb48b5a62b73597599f1eb48b5a-237090570391?q=george 

 

 



 



Around the Network

i don't see it. they will drag a gen on before they join forces, but its not a bad idea, but in my mind not how business works so it won't happen.

 thats why i say drag this gen out. make it a 20 yr gen just to get the cost of dev. and new tech down before the industry crashes.



Antabus said:

I am waiting for someone to comment on that. I would like to know how they are holding their controllers...

I have fairly big hands and love the DualShock controller.



                            

They already work together closely in the PC and phone markets. The Microsoft Windows commercials even feature Sony computers and electronics.



Anyone can guess. It takes no effort to throw out lots of predictions and have some of them be correct. You are not and wiser or better for having your guesses be right. Even a blind man can hit the bullseye.

AussieGecko said:
Necromunda said:

I can see Google getting together with Sony. Imagine what that could bring.


I personally can see Microsoft going with Sony first and here is why.

Sony Vaio gets advertised like crazy with MS, and MS advertises VAIO for the MS OS's. Now I see Sony basically having a lot of the areas where MS lacks Ie tvs, computers etc. That type of hardware.

MS would not go with Google for a long long time. This Android vs Apple war would be perfect for MS if they just let it be. But they wanted to put their own 2 cents in. They don't seem to be Googles best mate, also see Bing getting created, one for a future Iphone and 2 against Google.

As far as I know Sony has yet to announce plans to jump on the Android bandwagon yet will soon make a Windows 7 phone. It appears Sony seems to be siding with MS against Google. Dell has obviously sided with MS as well. MS is playing this very well, and it is not to make friends with Google. Google is a threat to Sony, MS and Apple. Hence why they are working together.

 

I dunno what will happen in 10-15 years as mentioned but as I said MS and Sony is a very big possibility imo vs possibly Google and Nintendo.

Hate to break it to you but, Sony has a few Android phones out, and they have for awhile. Making your arguments null and void lol. Xperia X10, and soon the X12, among a few other lower end android phones.



Around the Network
gurglesletch said:
Necromunda said:

I can see Google getting together with Sony. Imagine what that could bring.


Awesomeness


Exactly, I see absolutely no interest in Microsoft teaming up with Sony.

Honestly, I'm pretty confident that a Sony and Google partnership is going to spring up, I think we will see a big utilization of googles services on the PS4 to be honest.



mchaza said:
poroporo said:
MrBubbles said:

buy join forces, i assume they mean microsoft will buy sony's gaming division


And by the time that happens, Apple will have bought Microsoft.

I doubt Sony would sell there most profitable sector so Microsoft would just buy the entire corporation or Apple 

Uh, as of right now, over their entire history SCE isn't actually a profitable division overall.  Thanks to PS3.



Wagram said:

I would be fine with that. ONLY if Microsoft NEVER EVER able to touch the hardware building.

WTF?  360's a pretty well designed piece of kit overall (RROD notwithstanding, though they paid for that in the end)... I mean if anything it should be SCE's boutique/confusing architectures, restricting memory pools and shitty GPU decisions that should be barred from consideration.  



jarrod said:
Wagram said:

I would be fine with that. ONLY if Microsoft NEVER EVER able to touch the hardware building.

WTF?  360's a pretty well designed piece of kit overall (RROD notwithstanding, though they paid for that in the end)... I mean if anything it should be SCE's boutique/confusing architectures, restricting memory pools and shitty GPU decisions that should be barred from consideration.  

When every single 360 is prone to that, there is a problem.

I want a console that lasts, not one where I have to worry I might Red Ring every time I turn it on.



Wagram said:
jarrod said:
Wagram said:

I would be fine with that. ONLY if Microsoft NEVER EVER able to touch the hardware building.

WTF?  360's a pretty well designed piece of kit overall (RROD notwithstanding, though they paid for that in the end)... I mean if anything it should be SCE's boutique/confusing architectures, restricting memory pools and shitty GPU decisions that should be barred from consideration.  

When every single 360 is prone to that, there is a problem.

I want a console that lasts, not one where I have to worry I might Red Ring every time I turn it on.

I'm talking more architecture, and in terms of that Xenon/Xenos was cheaper to make, easier to exploit and came a full year earlier than the CELL/RSX.  SCE has a history of making obtuse, custom architectures that generally go against the grain when it comes to developers... ask most any independent dev and they'll probably say they'd prefer making a game on 360 to PS3.

And no, every single 360 isn't prone to RROD.  Not any more than every PS3 is prone to YLOD, and every PS2 was prone to DRE, and every PS1 was prone to MPEG/audio skips.