By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - 'Bland' Gran Turismo, Forza graphics avoided by NFS: Shift 2

BMaker11 said:
Snesboy said:
gurglesletch said:
Snesboy said:

So people actually can tell the difference between 30FPS and 60FPS? You people must have super powers.


Or not.


Yeah, human eye stops noticing shit like frames per second once it goes over 24FPS.

Try watching football at 60FPS and 120FPS. Big difference


60fps and 120fps would not be a difference in your eyes for a game.



Around the Network

Oh yeah you guys are taking what he said out of context heh. need for speed usually has much more going on imo than gt and forza.



I think he will regret his comment when first week data is here.



updated: 14.01.2012

playing right now: Xenoblade Chronicles

Hype-o-meter, from least to most hyped:  the Last Story, Twisted Metal, Mass Effect 3, Final Fantasy XIII-2, Final Fantasy Versus XIII, Playstation ViTA

bet with Mordred11 that Rage will look better on Xbox 360.

I prefer to have 60fps than more detailed 30fps, in 80% of cases (there may be an exeption for a very slow or static type of gameplay, like old horror survivals, or turn based games).



Snesboy said:
gurglesletch said:
Snesboy said:

So people actually can tell the difference between 30FPS and 60FPS? You people must have super powers.


Or not.


Yeah, human eye stops noticing shit like frames per second once it goes over 24FPS.

Then sell your PC monitor, buy an old one with 24Hz refresh rate, you won't see the difference -.-



Around the Network
Snesboy said:
gurglesletch said:
Snesboy said:

So people actually can tell the difference between 30FPS and 60FPS? You people must have super powers.


Or not.


Yeah, human eye stops noticing shit like frames per second once it goes over 24FPS.

That's not true, in fact there is no magic statistic of what your eyes can or cannot see because it's the brain that actually does a lot of the processing.  Peoples eyes and brains work differently, some people can actually tell between 60 fps and 120 fps.  The difference is when you start adding motion blurring and other effects it can fool your eyes into believing your looking at something running smooother than it actually is. 



--OkeyDokey-- said:
tuscaniman said:
--OkeyDokey-- said:
tuscaniman said:
4k1x3r said:
Lyrikalstylez said:

The Graphics sure look incedible for GT5 but I just find the gameply boring and repetitive

I prefer the gameplay of Midnight Club, Need for Speed and Burnout >>> GT5 & FORZA

 

... comments like thse make me lose hope in humanity.


Sorry but GT is not the end all be all. I'm glad you and many others think it is but I don't find driving around in a PT Cruiser for 4 hours trying to earn enough money to buy a Mustang, rinse and repeat for weeks till I can afford a fun car to drive an enjoyable experience. Thats not even mentioning wasting time earning licenses. I can say the same for Forza except minus the license part. Need for Speed and others like it are just a more gripping action experience. Unless someone is obsessed with cars then GT5 and Forza 3 just don't appeal as much.

LOL, you don't have to grind for weeks to get a fun car in GT. Just go to the used dealer and buy an old Integra or MX-5 with the money you start out with!

But yeah, if you're so unknowledgeable about cars that you'd buy a PT Cruiser and save up for a Mustang instead of something useful then it clearly isn't the game for you.


Yes because an integra or MX-5 are fast. I'm unknowledgeable about cars? A mustang would rape an integra or MX-5 anyday. 15 second 1/4 miles are not impressive. I'm talking stock vs stock. Mod vs mod stang would still win.

I suggest Reading Comprehension 101. Never said those cars were particularly fast. Just making a point that you can be driving a fun car in GT right off the bat instead of spending "4 hours in a PT Cruiser". Mustangs might be nice in NFS but this is a sim racer and you need to be able to turn corners :D

I don't find driving an integra or mx-5 fun. You may however but I prefer to drive cars that I will never experience in my lifetime.



I always thought the human eye could only see 30 frames a second and that multiples of 30 are prefered.

My mind is full of... FUCK.



Pixel Art can be fun.

MaxwellGT2000 said:
themanwithnoname said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
 


You can't go around posting pictures and gifs of real life cars and try to pass it off as GT5! :O

Anyway I think he's trying to say bland in the sense that Forza and GT go for looking like real life, real life is normal and that is the definition of bland, so maybe he's trying to say he wants more style and to go beyond normal.  But even if he is meaning that its a poor choice of words, though I don't think they have to do much to look better than Forza since the original Shift looks better than Forza 3 did.


Thanks for that, I needed a good laugh tonight.

Glad you got a chuckle, shame I enjoy blur effects to give a sense of speed, depth of field, crash effect that give you a good sense of being in a crash, and finally actually having people and things around the track so isn't boring to look at.

 

Believe me it took me a while to find that Forza video to give it a fair shake lol

Either way I'm not getting into this further than that, Shift isn't trying to simulate real life, and I find real life boring, so of course I'd find something that is trying to be a game rather than real life would be entertaining to look at.


I agree 100% with you, Shift was 3rd most played game when I had a 360, only behind Dragon Age and Borderlands. The sound was AMAZING, and also was the feeling.



Snesboy said:
gurglesletch said:
Snesboy said:

So people actually can tell the difference between 30FPS and 60FPS? You people must have super powers.


Or not.


Yeah, human eye stops noticing shit like frames per second once it goes over 24FPS.

I must have super human eyes cause I can tell easily.



EMULATION is the past.....NOW.......B_E_L_I_E_V_E