By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Activision: Best 3D experience in the game only on PS3.

Cheebee on 11 November 2010

... 3DS?

I'm pretty sure its 3D will be superior to anything PS3 could output.



Nintendo Network ID: Cheebee   3DS Code: 2320 - 6113 - 9046

 

Around the Network
Solid_Snake4RD on 11 November 2010
Legend11 said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:

At the launch event for Call of Duty: Black Ops in Berlin had the opportunity to test the game in 3D.

There the game on a XBOX360 was shown in 3D, which we are not convinced so real. Although a certain sense of depth was evident, but this effect disappeared after a short, if we had gotten used to it. We've talked about this with Lead Animator Adam Rosas, said that one will have the best 3D experience in the game only on PS3.

The reason is quite simple. The PS3 is built for 3D gaming, while it is only an added feature in the Xbox 360. This was noticeable especially in fast movements. In this virtually nothing was visible in the picture, and certainly not in 3D.

 

http://playfront.de/call-of-duty-black-ops-optimales-3d-erlebnis-nur-auf-der-ps3/


So everything else in the game from frame rate to resolution is better on the 360 but somehow they dropped the ball on 3D?  Yeah I'm not buying that at all.  Why wasn't I suprised to see big pictures of the PS3 everywhere when I clicked on that link?


keep your foolish comparisions to urself

3D is much more than the normal comparision you brought out

 

and you don't need to quote the OP to respond to it

 



Solid_Snake4RD on 11 November 2010
Cheebee said:

... 3DS?

I'm pretty sure its 3D will be superior to anything PS3 could output.


3DS won't be 3DS if it could do that as it would need to be a console

 

disolitude said:
sully1311 said:

I put more faith in DF. I would even bet that the 360 would be more capable of a better 3d image than ps3


If a developer takes their time to build 3D from the ground up, and invests resources in optimizing the cell to holp with 3d processing, PS3 should be able to beat 360 in 3D rendering.

However for any game which is finished, and then the develoepr says "lets make this 3D"...360 should beat PS3 every time. People can blame the RSX and the 256 dedicated video ram...which get beat out in benchmarks by Xenos and 512 mb ram unified architecture. Not to mention the 10 MB on cpu die which 360 has which helps a lot in 3D situations...


i knew i would find you in this thread

 

mentioning RSX and comparing to 360 why do you forget the CELL and how alot of PS3's load is onto it

 

also who tells you they didn't implement 3D from the starting

just because the  announcement was late doesn't mean it started then



leo-j on 11 November 2010
Cheebee said:

... 3DS?

I'm pretty sure its 3D will be superior to anything PS3 could output.


no it wont, the 3DS wont be able to output high resolution 3D

and you people really haven't seen a ps3 running 3D GAMES to say anything

@disolitude

so you trust digital foundary who wasn't even directly quoted to saying the 360's 3D was superior, but saying the game itself was superior on the 360, over the actual DEVELOPER?



 

mM
Cheebee on 11 November 2010
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Cheebee said:

... 3DS?

I'm pretty sure its 3D will be superior to anything PS3 could output.


3DS won't be 3DS if it could do that as it would need to be a console

... What?



Nintendo Network ID: Cheebee   3DS Code: 2320 - 6113 - 9046

 

Around the Network
Solid_Snake4RD on 11 November 2010
Cheebee said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Cheebee said:

... 3DS?

I'm pretty sure its 3D will be superior to anything PS3 could output.


3DS won't be 3DS if it could do that as it would need to be a console

... What?

it would be a big explaination

 

you tell me hoe 3ds would be better and i will tell you how it won't

 

that way we only concentrate on that point



freebs2 on 11 November 2010
Cheebee said:

... 3DS?

I'm pretty sure its 3D will be superior to anything PS3 could output.


Not sure about that....but It will certainly be more useble and less expansive.



disolitude on 11 November 2010
leo-j said:
Cheebee said:

... 3DS?

I'm pretty sure its 3D will be superior to anything PS3 could output.


no it wont, the 3DS wont be able to output high resolution 3D

and you people really haven't seen a ps3 running 3D GAMES to say anything

@disolitude

so you trust digital foundary who wasn't even directly quoted to saying the 360's 3D was superior, but saying the game itself was superior on the 360, over the actual DEVELOPER?

Yeah I do...cause that person is just stating PR bullshit and no technical reason is provided.

I also trust my own 3D gaming experiences. Been playing 3D games for 2 years now. I went through countless videocards and setups. If a game runs with better frame rate in 2D on one machine setup, it will run the game better in 3D...period.

PS3 doesn't have any trickery it can do to make a game work in 3D better while lacking in 2D. All PS3 does that 360 doesn't when it comes to 3D is say "Hello 3D TV, I have an HDMI 1.4 port"...



disolitude on 11 November 2010
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Cheebee said:

... 3DS?

I'm pretty sure its 3D will be superior to anything PS3 could output.


3DS won't be 3DS if it could do that as it would need to be a console

 

disolitude said:
sully1311 said:

I put more faith in DF. I would even bet that the 360 would be more capable of a better 3d image than ps3


If a developer takes their time to build 3D from the ground up, and invests resources in optimizing the cell to holp with 3d processing, PS3 should be able to beat 360 in 3D rendering.

However for any game which is finished, and then the develoepr says "lets make this 3D"...360 should beat PS3 every time. People can blame the RSX and the 256 dedicated video ram...which get beat out in benchmarks by Xenos and 512 mb ram unified architecture. Not to mention the 10 MB on cpu die which 360 has which helps a lot in 3D situations...


i knew i would find you in this thread

 

mentioning RSX and comparing to 360 why do you forget the CELL and how alot of PS3's load is onto it

 

also who tells you they didn't implement 3D from the starting

just because the  announcement was late doesn't mean it started then

lol...ok, so game in 2D is worse on PS3...they didn't optimize that on Ps3 since development beginning. But wait, 3D has been optimized from the start and is running better on PS3? Riight...

For black ops, teh Cell isn't making the game better in 2D compared to 360 version...why would it be optimized for 3D any better?



Solid_Snake4RD on 11 November 2010
disolitude said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Cheebee said:

... 3DS?

I'm pretty sure its 3D will be superior to anything PS3 could output.


3DS won't be 3DS if it could do that as it would need to be a console

 

disolitude said:
sully1311 said:

I put more faith in DF. I would even bet that the 360 would be more capable of a better 3d image than ps3


If a developer takes their time to build 3D from the ground up, and invests resources in optimizing the cell to holp with 3d processing, PS3 should be able to beat 360 in 3D rendering.

However for any game which is finished, and then the develoepr says "lets make this 3D"...360 should beat PS3 every time. People can blame the RSX and the 256 dedicated video ram...which get beat out in benchmarks by Xenos and 512 mb ram unified architecture. Not to mention the 10 MB on cpu die which 360 has which helps a lot in 3D situations...


i knew i would find you in this thread

 

mentioning RSX and comparing to 360 why do you forget the CELL and how alot of PS3's load is onto it

 

also who tells you they didn't implement 3D from the starting

just because the  announcement was late doesn't mean it started then

lol...ok, so game in 2D is worse on PS3...they didn't optimize that on Ps3 since development beginning. But wait, 3D has been optimized from the start and is running better on PS3? Riight...

For black ops, teh Cell isn't making the game better in 2D compared to 360 version...why would it be optimized for 3D any better?


it get your point

 

but it isn't always that you just put 2d into 2 frames and start working

they have to consider what all can be carried onto the 3d version

 

and i think the 360 version is 640p(i don't know the exact thing) but they can't just double the frames as at