I'm pretty sure its 3D will be superior to anything PS3 could output.
3DS won't be 3DS if it could do that as it would need to be a console
disolitude said:
sully1311 said:
I put more faith in DF. I would even bet that the 360 would be more capable of a better 3d image than ps3
If a developer takes their time to build 3D from the ground up, and invests resources in optimizing the cell to holp with 3d processing, PS3 should be able to beat 360 in 3D rendering.
However for any game which is finished, and then the develoepr says "lets make this 3D"...360 should beat PS3 every time. People can blame the RSX and the 256 dedicated video ram...which get beat out in benchmarks by Xenos and 512 mb ram unified architecture. Not to mention the 10 MB on cpu die which 360 has which helps a lot in 3D situations...
i knew i would find you in this thread
mentioning RSX and comparing to 360 why do you forget the CELL and how alot of PS3's load is onto it
also who tells you they didn't implement 3D from the starting
just because the announcement was late doesn't mean it started then
lol...ok, so game in 2D is worse on PS3...they didn't optimize that on Ps3 since development beginning. But wait, 3D has been optimized from the start and is running better on PS3? Riight...
For black ops, teh Cell isn't making the game better in 2D compared to 360 version...why would it be optimized for 3D any better?
it get your point
but it isn't always that you just put 2d into 2 frames and start working
they have to consider what all can be carried onto the 3d version
and i think the 360 version is 640p(i don't know the exact thing) but they can't just double the frames as at
