| Nsanity said: Not according to DigitalFoundry. |
Please, copy the part where DF said that.
| Nsanity said: Not according to DigitalFoundry. |
Please, copy the part where DF said that.
nightsurge said:
How is it obvious? If anything it seems obvious that he ONLY tried the 360 version since he had to get an opinion from someone else and didn't give his own personal impressions for the PS3 version. Simple observation, Watson. |
yeah just stick to the words and criticize like the people who did try it were fool to come up with
and they actually compared when they said the 3d on 360 version was not all over comparing to the other version
I am a PS3 user, but even with money to buy a 3D TV and MOVE, I have no intention of that.. WTF... use glasses for 3D??? Are you Kidding?? In 2 years will be available TV´s without glasses and 3D enabled TV with glasses will be a standart in 2011 Q2... so... spend money on that right now isn´t so smart...
PSN: franco-br
MGS4, GH, MW2, GT5p, WipeoutHD, etc..etc..
| kibebr said: I am a PS3 user, but even with money to buy a 3D TV and MOVE, I have no intention of that.. WTF... use glasses for 3D??? Are you Kidding?? In 2 years will be available TV´s without glasses and 3D enabled TV with glasses will be a standart in 2011 Q2... so... spend money on that right now isn´t so smart... |
whining about something thats not even being discuss
please read the topic before commenting
ethomaz said:
Please, copy the part where DF said that. |
"Bearing in mind all the hard work PlayStation 3 has done as the standard-bearer for true stereoscopic 3D console gaming, it's a bit of a blow that Black Ops just doesn't work particularly well on the Sony platform and it's clearly the Xbox 360 game that offers a smoother, superior-looking experience. "
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-call-of-duty-black-ops-faceoff?page=3
disolitude said:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-call-of-duty-black-ops-faceoff?page=3 |
I read again and saw the after your answer in other thread.
I put more faith in DF. I would even bet that the 360 would be more capable of a better 3d image than ps3
| sully1311 said: I put more faith in DF. I would even bet that the 360 would be more capable of a better 3d image than ps3 |
If a developer takes their time to build 3D from the ground up, and invests resources in optimizing the cell to holp with 3d processing, PS3 should be able to beat 360 in 3D rendering.
However for any game which is finished, and then the develoepr says "lets make this 3D"...360 should beat PS3 every time. People can blame the RSX and the 256 dedicated video ram...which get beat out in benchmarks by Xenos and 512 mb ram unified architecture. Not to mention the 10 MB on cpu die which 360 has which helps a lot in 3D situations...
disolitude said:
However for any game which is finished, and then the develoepr says "lets make this 3D"...360 should beat PS3 every time. People can blame the RSX and the 256 dedicated video ram... |
Yea, I suppose, but thats never gonna happen for a multiplatform.
| Solid_Snake4RD said: At the launch event for Call of Duty: Black Ops in Berlin had the opportunity to test the game in 3D.
http://playfront.de/call-of-duty-black-ops-optimales-3d-erlebnis-nur-auf-der-ps3/ |
So everything else in the game from frame rate to resolution is better on the 360 but somehow they dropped the ball on 3D? Yeah I'm not buying that at all. Why wasn't I suprised to see big pictures of the PS3 everywhere when I clicked on that link?