Jordahn said:
daroamer said:
Jordahn said:
daroamer said:
The Wii sold most of its units at the $250 price point, Xbox 360 with Kinect is $300. $50 is not a deal breaker especially since it can also play DVDs and has HD graphics.
|
The market has changed. When the Wii was $250, there was no Kinect while the Core 360 was $300. Now, we have a base model 360 Slim with Kinect compared to a $200 Wii with two games a Motion Plus. $300 for a base model 360 Slim with Kinect is not bad. But in today's market there is a much bigger difference with the Wii.
|
I'm not making a comparison to the current Wii. The original point was that people will spend $250 if it's a fun experience and $300 is not that big a different. This isn't about whether they would rather spend money on the current Wii or Xbox 360, just whether the price is too much to even consider for casuals, clearly it isn't.
|
AGAIN, different market. You'd be naive to buy a "new" never-been-used 5 year old plasma TV at its original price in today's market when Plasma tech has advanced while paying less for it. Do I need to explain further?
|
Yes, you're missing the point.
When the TV was new and state of the art it was worth $2000 and you were willing to pay it. You wouldn't pay $2000 for that TV now since it's no longer state of the art. However, you would still be willing to spend $2000 an a new TV that is brand new, state of the art and way more sophisticated with better picture and features than what you bought 5 years ago.
The amount of money you spend isn't the issue, it's what you're getting for your money.
Kinect is perceptibly way more advanced than the Wii (especially to casuals), not to mention the Xbox is way more advanced as well. HD graphics, better sound and more features.