Okay? Sure, I'll give it that. The fact that worldwide, it's down only 41% versus a much stronger competition isn't too bad. However, the price spin isn't entirely accurate; it failed to account for inflation. The $299.99 of (near) today is valued at $242.22 in 2001, or $364.23 in 2001 to 2009 (the last year availiable) dollars. So yes, the PS3 still costs more than the PS2, but I don't think that it will make that drastic a change.
In all honesty, though, I do think some peoples' projections for the PS3 are... far too optimistic. The PS2 has been able to maintain sales due to its being the undisputed leader of the last generation. The PS3, not in this situation, will see considerably shorter legs. And for the developing markets, I hate to say it, but piracy is rampant in them. The PS2, cracked 6 ways from Sunday, can sell systems because of the availiability of local games that are more reasonably priced to the economies of these countries. The PS3, having only a large crack in its shell, will be stunted in these regions, as games will not be seen as affordable to the masses in them.
I'm pegging the PS3 to be about 43-45 million at the end of this year. (If you want an exact number, for giggles, 44,444,444.) And, while I don't want to see it, I predict that Nintendo will announce its successor to the Wii next year. (And no, not a WiiHD, a true successor.) With it launching in 2012, the next gen will start, slowing the legs of everything currently on the market. I'm going to guess 12.5m for PS3 in 2011, 11m in 2012, 7m in 2013 (PS4 announcement/release), 5m in 2014, and another 5m in long, for lifetime of 85m. And I'd call that okay, even in light of what the PS2 did.
-dunno001
-On a quest for the truly perfect game; I don't think it exists...














