By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Who has the best 1st party devs this gen

 

Who has the best 1st party devs this gen

SONY World Wide Studios 184 59.16%
 
Nintendo 117 37.62%
 
Microsoft 10 3.22%
 
Total:311
Yakuzaice said:
rf40928 said:

In topics like these whichever fans visits your post most is the way the vote talley will sway.. IE.. visited by mostly Wii fans.. Xbox 360.. or PS3 ..

What i find hilarious is Sony is voted best, yet if they are the best how come they are last place in game sales ?  their console has been nearly the same price as 360 for over a year and they even have a bluray player.. their games don't cost any significant amount more then 360's or Wii's do they ?  My objective question if Sony games are so good how come people arent flocking to buy them when price isnt a issue..  I think this just goes back to what I said above.. if you have a poll on welfare and more democrats visit you're poll you're gonna get a one sided story on welfare.. but the real story is where people put their wallets and cash.. and thats more true with the PS3 and Xb 360 because they sell many of the best selling multi-platform games..

You do realize this poll is about first party studios, and it isn't about sales.  So I'm not sure why you are bringing up overall software sales.  Even then, looking at Microsoft published games, they no longer have (or never had) Bungie, Ensemble, Bizarre Creations, Epic, Realtime Worlds, Team Ninja, Mistwalker, Remedy, Silicon Knights, iNiS, Screenlife, Zoe Mode, Triumph, Q Entertainment, From Software, Artoon, Blitz Games, also a Gearbox, Eden, and Rockstar games are listed for them as well (I guess they published them in one region).

So that brings the ~73m Microsoft published games down to ~16.2 million from current Microsoft Games Studios.

Now obviously stuff like Halo from 343 will still sell pretty well, but their first party is pretty much down to Lionhead, Rare, and Turn 10 these days.  It's hardly controversial to say that both Sony and Nintendo have better groups of first party studios.  Of course opinions can differ, maybe Fable is your favorite series ever, but even then you can't really be surprised that most people prefer Sony or Nintendo.

Also based on your line of thinking, would you agree that Wii Fit is by far the best game released this generation?  It has almost certainly brought in more revenue than any other console or handheld game.

By my reasoning Wii fit ( which came bundled with alot of Wii's ) isn't a factor in best selling games.. because best selling games are ones people go out and buy because they have to have it.. not because they saved 40 dollars buying it bundled..

That being said.. Having alot of 1st party studios is a philosophy that is supposed to mean more high quality games that sell more games then what your competition does.  This philosophy worked well for Sony in the past mainly because the PS2's large userbase which Sony had a 1.5 year launch ( of the PS2 ) headstart on the very underpowered gamecube ( that didnt even play DVD's ) and  nearly 2yrs headstart on MS's first endeavor - Xbox 1 ( which was more powerful but way too late to put a dent into the Sony machine that was rolling hot off PS1's success ) ...The only reason any game studio ( 1st party or not ) exist is to sell alot.. and my whole point is.. if Sony is in last place in sales of games ( the only reason they exist is to make titles that sell alot and equally as important to make ALOT OF CASH ) .. then sales are saying that Sony is doing someting wrong someplace...

So you can argue yeah they have more 1st party studios, you can argue the quality is 'better' in your opinion.. but the sales don't reflect that alot of kids out there care who has more support in 1st party..

They care about who has the best games..  Yes kids, because lets face it.. gaming has shifted away from Asia and more to the west..  and kids now want great First Person Shooters.. Addictive action packed in your face reflex, mt dew drinking fun..  and half of games out there thankfully yeah offer something different, but frankly most kids now are playing COD or Halo...  If you look up most played games on PSN, or Xbox Live it'll reflect what Im saying that FPS's are where its at.. which makes alot of exclusive 1st party studio philosopy alittle less important, even though it still is a good thing ..All COD titles are among  the best selling games on both consoles and most played overall on PSN or Xbox Live networks.. Games like Final Fantasy are still selling decent, but compared to 15 yrs ago they are a dieing game genre.. alot of kids find those games boring now.. and when I was that age FF was what alot of us loved..  So 3rd party support is as important or more important if thats what sells more games... and again these are the #1 sellers on both consoles..

 I think the big picture is this.. its not the number of 1st party studios or 3rd party studios you have.  If you have a large enough user base then if you know which games to market and which studios to keep close thats all that really matters.. Sony has lost just enough exclusives to make it lose some luster.. and MS in only its 2nd gen system has kept pace with Sony in number consoles sold worldwide and just plain outsold them in games overall, but mostly in best selling titles that can push system sales.. Right now Move is helping PS3, but I think it'll be the same story for Kinect.. not a huge rush, but enough to push sales... having the most 1st party studio's no longer guarantee's anything.. All you need are a few good ones.. and the days of great one console exclusives are lessening as well.. which is why a good many best sellers are multi-platform titles..

If you're merely a Sony fan or a MS fan or a Nintendo fan I guess you can completely buy into this 1st party matters most... but in the real world sales dictate to executives what works and what doesnt.. which is ones reason Activision ( the largest 3rd party studio in the world ) aquired Bungie studios, which in turn will probably make more money making a multi-platform game... Which goes back to my originally post.. If 1st party studios matter so much and their games are so good.. why is Sony so far behind in overall game sales ( and also in best selling titles ) when they are not that far behind the 360 in worldwide console sales...

Those of you who made it into I'm mad so I had to bring up sales figures missed the whole point..because your fanboyism somehow figured 1st party mattered because there's a 1 in front of it instead of a 3 ..  If you're Sony, MS, Nintendo and you're  3rd party developer is making better games and selling more then you're 1st party studio ( to whom you're paying more money ) that makes it all less worthwhile and could change how you do business later.. you ask yourself:  Do 1st party studios matter as much when YOU're user base is no longer #1 in most consoles sold  &  developers dont want to make an exclusive for you when you dont have the world largest userbase and wont get the biggest return ? .. I GUARANTEE if the Wii  when it was launched ) has been as  powerful a system as the 360 or PS3 ( while still having that motion controller ) it would have the most exclusives that rocked ( aka PS2 ) only because every developer would jump onboard knowing a big paycheck would be coming later.., And do 1st party studios  matter as much when the industry is shifting to a new business model philosophy that 3rd party studios make as good of games as anyone else  - make more money and get it done faster too..



Around the Network

For the first post, you forgots Monolith for Nintendo with Disaster & Xenoblade

also Metroid Prime 3 & Trilogy for Retro studios

Animal Crossing, Super Paper Mario, Smash Bros brawl, Excite truck & bots, Another Code.

 

Sony is realy great this gen but clearely behind Nintendo by a little



evolution_1ne said:
Fumanchu said:
evolution_1ne said:
Fumanchu said:

Well I think it really illustrates the point of how niche and out of tune this community is compared to the entire gaming populace.  If this were a census vote from all the install bases, you'll find there'd be more Wii Fit fans than God of War fans.


which is actually funny because I would bet that 90% of people who own wii fit would not call themselves fans of the game.

like 90% of gym members wouldn't call themselves fans of the gym.

This is just a popularity contest though - put Wii Fit and God of War in front of everyone that owns a console and because of its' familiarity and sales more would prefer Wii Fit

exactly, so who would you rather get advice from on what's the better gym, body builders/athletes or people that just go to the gym......

the entire GAMING populace would pick god of war.

asking gamers what is better is very different from asking anyone who owns a console what is better. It just proves how niche the actual gaming community is compared to people that just own consoles.

Do you actually have any statistical data to claim that Wii Fit owners use their console less? I think that's a prejudice to cater towards an answer.  We know for sure that many more consumers are voting with their dollars to vehemently prove it's a more sought after product.   



Fumanchu said:
evolution_1ne said:
Fumanchu said:
evolution_1ne said:
Fumanchu said:

Well I think it really illustrates the point of how niche and out of tune this community is compared to the entire gaming populace.  If this were a census vote from all the install bases, you'll find there'd be more Wii Fit fans than God of War fans.


which is actually funny because I would bet that 90% of people who own wii fit would not call themselves fans of the game.

like 90% of gym members wouldn't call themselves fans of the gym.

This is just a popularity contest though - put Wii Fit and God of War in front of everyone that owns a console and because of its' familiarity and sales more would prefer Wii Fit

exactly, so who would you rather get advice from on what's the better gym, body builders/athletes or people that just go to the gym......

the entire GAMING populace would pick god of war.

asking gamers what is better is very different from asking anyone who owns a console what is better. It just proves how niche the actual gaming community is compared to people that just own consoles.

Do you actually have any statistical data to claim that Wii Fit owners use their console less? I think that's a prejudice to cater towards an answer.  We know for sure that many more consumers are voting with their dollars to vehemently prove it's a more sought after product.   


wii fit over god of war...... in the gaming market......lol yeah, what ever you say.



iBlah said:
gurglesletch said:

You forgot Quantic Dream and Insomniac for the Sony list.


they develop for sony but they're both private studios. anyway Naughty Dog FTW!!!!!


Alright your right but i was trying to read as much as possible before I left for work.



Around the Network

Nintendo, as usual, only time they were rivaled was when Sega made consoles.

Sony have stepped up their game, but I would never be able to tell a Sony game from a third party game if I saw it on store shelves and hadn't done my research.

Microsoft's first party is laughable, they really aren't a gaming company.



I LOVE ICELAND!

jarrod said:
Severance said:

there you go, i've removed the remakes and remasters they don't really count as "This gen" and if you are adding PC games then you might want to add SOE games as well.

i also added some PSP games you missed (i think i missed more)

Also, Patapon 3 already released (in Europe) and Eyepet PSP is contracted out to Playlogic for development.  Neither is applicable then.

I don't mean to get into this lobby list warathon, but my patapon sensor went off and (POOF!) I instantly transported here! With that said, Patapon 3 has not been released yet... as a matter of fact, it has the opposite of released, it's been pushed out of a 2010 launch D: It currently has an official release window of 2011 for NA and Europe. :'(

I should know, I'm an expert.

BTW, don't forget this!



Nintendo>>>Sony>>>>>>>Microsoft




Boutros said:

Why are people turning this into a sales argument?

When I play a game, I don't care how many copies it sold. It doesn't affect my experience whatsoever at all.

This thread is about the quality of the games.

You can still think Nintendo is the best but don't say it's because it sold more or because "they're the only one seemingly able to support two platforms".


But that is going to be totally opinion-based and therefore undebatable.

There has to be some objective evidence to make this thread even worth taking part in. Surely just a list of people's opinions is going to become very boring. That said, my personal preference is Nintendo and if you go by sales, most people agree.



Yes.

www.spacemag.org - contribute your stuff... satire, comics, ideas, debate, stupidy stupid etc.

remember guys 

i took out all DS and PSP games as i am classing this gen as 

PS3/360/Wii at the moment 

I might of miss out a few nintendo studios as my understanding of there games isn't strong. 



Of Course That's Just My Opinion, I Could Be Wrong