How the fucking hell does fable 3 get 8 points less than fable 2 when its superior in every single way!

First of all, the co-op in fable 2 sucked badly, the co-op in fable 3 is fucken amazing! I just got off of it, you can use your own character, find treasures, share deals, get married, do anything! So the mode in which you can play the whole entire game through is better, then how the fuck did the game get rated less?

The story mode on fable 3 is so much better, better story, amazing dialogue, and they actually did make me feel for the characters.

Not to mention, reveiwers are bitching about fable 3's bugs (Which I havent found any yet), and they ignored fable 2's bugs? fable 2 is 1,000 times buggier than fable 3, and that's NOT an exaduration.

fable 3 deserves a 9.3 rating. Why? its the best game in the last two years i think, but like any game, it isnt perfect. It still lags a little in cities, and could use a little polishing, but thats it. nothing gameplay wise i would want to change other than make you do more things to get followers and make the king mode 2-4 times as long. basicaly my only complaint about the game is that it ended. Ignore the fucking review, get fable 3! also, if you can get it cheap i would recommend fable 2 as well, its not as good but it gives you a good feeling about how to play

The only review site i use is IGN, then VGC if I want a 2nd opinion. Ign scored Fable 3 a 9.0, higher than what they scored Fable 2 (an 8 point something, I forget) and VGC captioned their review, which I didn't read, 'Third time's the charm'! Which site u talking bout?

Poor Fable reviewers never want to give you no love. It's like the British redheaded stepchild Microsofts Flagship Frachises.

Critics love Halo,Forza,and Gears (even though I know it is not first party it feels like it is.) There will always be reviewers that want to beat the hell out of the Franchise. I feel it is even sadder this time because from the reviews it does not sound like Peter did not lie about anything this time. Everything he promised that was going to be in there was there. I think the reviewers just have it out for him ever since he overpromised on FABLE 1. Even with the overpromising the games are fun as hell. There is just nothing like them.

Anyways I am glad you are loving it and I can not wait to play it myself.

What site are you talking about?

IGN gave Fable III a 8.5 and IGN UK gave Fable III a 8.

http://au.xbox360.ign.com/articles/113/1130321p1.html

IGN also gave Fable II a 8.8

Edit: In fact there's an editorial about why Fable III fails. http://au.xbox360.ign.com/articles/113/1130705p1.html

Isn't the OP a review too, so should we also disregard that?

Reviews should be taken as seriously as a grain of salt. Reviews are just an opinion. Nothing more, nothing less.

Woah! I read some of the comments and those FABLE fans are seriously pissed off at IGN now. Some of the comments were just basically like "FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK you I am never coming to his site again" over and over again.

well that's it, reviewers are saying it's not superior in every single way..........

I personally can not comprehend how Lords of Shadow and Vanquish could average the same review score. I mean, both are videogames, and one blows gameplay wise and the other doesn't...

So I figure its best not to pay attention to reviews and value games based on the entertainment value they provide to you.  Fable 3 still got good reviews so not big deal...