According to the criteria mentioned in the OP, Hustle Kings needs to be removed. It was released 10 months ago, Move control was added only recently.

I was just about to post that. If not, put RE5 and Heavy Rain on the list.

Why would he add games that were reviewed based on the normal controller? If both Heavy Rain and RE5 had MetaCritic page for only the MOVE edition reviews then he should've added them.

EDIT: Seems like HR move edition has its own MetaCritic page
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/heavy-rain-move-edition

i think this is a good idea Seece.

There's absolutely 0 games on that whole list that interest me :(

John Daly's Pro-golf: 55

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/john-dalys-prostroke-golf

Now Move fans, take heart; Gamespot's review notes that the game has fantastic implementation of the controls-- its just that everything else sucked. But if these guys can use Move right, then anyone can-- and Sony even moreso.

The scores suck so far, and I'm not questioning the reviewers' integrity or anything, but I feel like it certainly doesn't reflect my experience with Move. TC:RS is great, SC is very good and I even had a great time with KF-R.

Still, it gives the product a negative image. :/

So many butthurt Sony fans in this thread. The criteria for which games make the list make perfect sense to me. Why would we include RE5 in the list when the scores for that game are based off non-Move controls? It would be stupid.

When  was this announced for the PS Eye?  AFAIK it's Kinect and controller only so far.

That probably would be a good idea if people knew how to review.  One of the reviews gives it 100 since it's like a game of the year addition with extra stuff for cheaper.  Yet when it comes to move controller the review calls it disapointing and recomends the DS3.  While the other review hadn't reviewed the game to begin with, but maybe that's a good thing.