Oh and Insomniac released 5 games so far on the PS3 with 2 more coming next year exclusively on PS3 while Naughty dog only released 2, Guerilla games are about to release there 2nd game, Santa monica released 1 and Polyphoney digital have yet to release 1. I think that along speaks for itself

2 things:

1 Quantity=/=Quality, if it was, the Imagine games would be the best ever.

2: Polyphony have released GT5p

Yeah but the games Insomniac have release where quality.

RFOM=86 metacritic

Resistance 2=87 metacritic

Ratchet T of D=89 meta

Ratchet CIT= 87 meta

There lowest game was quest for bouty at 76 metacritic and that got marked down cause it was a psn title and it was short.

Also GT5P is more like a single player demo with added online beta. Its code taken from GT5 thrown on a disc and released for a price to help out fans thats waiting and to help them test the game/ bring in more money.

Tou-actual-che.

In that respect then EA knows the PS3 better than Insomniac seeing as they have released much more games over the last 4 years?

It's all to do with quality and what is being done with the system.  In my opinion, Naughty Dog and Guerilla Games have shown more of what the PS3 can do than Insomniac has.

Don't get me wrong, Insomniac know their stuff, but in respect of what each respective company has done with their engines on the PS3, Insomniac doesn't shine as much as the others, although this is probably down to the quick development cycles that they've been on until recently and hopefully the extra year for R3 will show how much more they can do with the PS3....and then they will have to compete with Uncharted 3, Killzone 3 and inFamous 2 among other games.

Soooo.... who actually clicked the source and read the context? The OP and thread title are very misleading.

From the link:

"Insomniac Games used the PlayStation 3 hardware more effectively than any other studio before it during development of 2007's Ratchet & Clank: Tools Of Destruction."

That's a pretty important distinction to make. So all those comments about Uncharted 2/ND, inFamous 2/Sucker Punch, GT5/Polyphony Digital etc. are kinda redundant as they're all after the game in question.

What I want to know is how this is news on 10/19/2010? It clearly says during development of 2007's Rachet and Clank game.  3 years ago!!

Are you serious????? EAs a Publisher and Insomniacs a development studio. EA= dozens of development studios. Insomniac= 1 dev company 2 dev teams.

Sorry Insomniac, I like Resistance and all but Naughty Dog owns you up and over the wall. So does Guerilla, Media Molecule, Square-Enix, and many others!

I read the initial quote but I gotta say,

If you rank Polyphony over Insomniac this generation it just seems very illogical. They've only released GT5:Prologue and that's it! Yeah they are working on GT5 which might be the best racer ever, but it is taking them like 6 years to make it. I bet if Insomniac put all that time into making resistance 1, it could have been a 100% rating. But it's nonsense, because if it takes you so long to make a game then you aren't really a high quality developer(on that system), because it takes you so long to get the job done.

Santa Monica has only made God of War 3 (and a nonessential port), which is a good game but how can a single game compete with several games that have been developed by Insomniac? It doesn't make any sense. You can make the quality of quantity point, but Insomniac games are quality! Maybe not 95% but still they aren't anything to laugh at at all.

Now Naughty Dog, I guess I can let that one slide. But still, we are aruing we knows the system more, it's not about who has made the single most high quality game.