Well Im glad this is the last Gears game... I want epic to make a real sequel to Unreal Tournament in the style of UNREAL TOURNAMENT. Of course, you wont get what I'm talking about unless you've played the old and new ones.
Mendicate Bias said:
From what I remember of the original Killzone it was way behind on a ton of features in comparison to other games in the same genre when it released. The game was missing a lot of simple features that had become standard at the time for console shooters, like the ability to move when scoped in with the sniper rifle. Not to mention the game was very buggy/glitchy. Thats probably cause it was rushed out since I remember them touting it as the "Halo Killer". On the other hand Gears completely changed the landscape for third person shooters on a console with its cover system, split screen and online co-op and multiplayer. So basically what I'm saying was that Gears advanced its genre while the original Killzone was missing features already standard in shooters at that time. It might seem like I'm being harsh but to give the original Killzone a 9 is just weird and completely questionable when you see that they gave Gears an 8. |
Like I said earlier though, it's about personal preferences and pretty much all reviews are subjective. A game can have so much content and improvements in its genre but a man, a woman, a gamer may still not enjoy it. Vice versa for not having much content or a lot of improvements.
I understand where you are coming from though and r-e-s-p-e-c-t to it.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
