By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Christine O'Donnell is the worst candidate ever

Mr Khan said:

She's a sacrificial lamb. Any GOP strategist wouldn't have let her within 100 miles of a precinct they actually had a chance of winning. Kinda like when the GOP put up Lynn Swann against Ed Rendell in Pennsylvania in 06. You put your wierder candidates out there to fail so they don't come back to haunt you when the tide is turning in your favor more definitively.


Actually that seat was considered "way in play" until they elected her.  Now everyones not so sure, though non-biased insiders suggest you shouldn't discount her yet.  Which are hard to find of course.

Neither the conservatives or democrats want her to succeed though, or any tea party.  It's literally like the Democrats and Republicans worst nightmare.

Third parties are bad buisness.   Even worse are third parties like the tea party which seems to have very few plank platforms and can basically just put in any politician that bests fits that areas beliefs without bothering anybody.'

Which granted the tea party hasn't done yet because they really are more like the articles of confederation then the current federal party system.



Around the Network
ManusJustus said:
TheRealMafoo said:

They are against the government forcing another's idea of morality onto you. This includes there own morality (what sets them apart).

That is a huge lie.  I've heard Tea Party politicans speak, I have one of my own running in the Republican side in my state, they want to take more freedoms away than the Republicans they replaced and the Democrats they are running against.

For example, Democrats ten to let the woman decide on abortion and Republicans tend to want abortion to be banned expect for cases of rape and incest.  The retarded Tea Party candidate wants to ban abortion in all cases, so even underage girls who were raped by their father would be forced to have a child.  The morning after pill is considered abortion to, so they want to get rid of that as well.

That actually makes way more sense then the standard republican position.  Though, the tea party doesn't really have many plank issues that you can call "Their stance."

Afterall, if you consider it a human life, why is it NOT a human life if somebody has been raped?  Does rape or incest suddenly make a baby a horrible monster who isn't a real person?

If you believe a fetus is a person, then the only justifiable cause for abortion should be mothers life issues.

Anything else is just... COMPLETE bullshit.

Either a compramising of what you believe, or you don't really know what you believe.



Besides, are you kidding me...?  She practiced Wicca and this is considered a BAD step for the republcian party?

Religious diversity... well, almost anyway. 

Wicca actually is apparently one of the fastest growing religions out there as well for what it's worth.



TheRealMafoo said:
ManusJustus said:
TheRealMafoo said:

They are against the government forcing another's idea of morality onto you. This includes there own morality (what sets them apart).

That is a huge lie.  I've heard Tea Party politicans speak, I have one of my own running in the Republican side in my state, they want to take more freedoms away than the Republicans they replaced and the Democrats they are running against.

For example, Democrats ten to let the woman decide on abortion and Republicans tend to want abortion to be banned expect for cases of rape and incest.  The retarded Tea Party candidate wants to ban abortion in all cases, so even underage girls who were raped by their father would be forced to have a child.  The morning after pill is considered abortion to, so they want to get rid of that as well.

Who is the candidate?

Also, this is what got Rand Paul called a racist. He was for everything in the civil rights movement, other then telling completely private restaurants who they are required to serve food to.

He feeling, is if I buy my own piece of land without government assistance, build a building on it without government assistance, and operate it without government assistance, I should be 100% allowed to say who can enter my property.

That's his position, is had nothing to do with race. They then asked him "So it's ok to have a restaurant with a sign that says "no blacks allowed". The obvious answer is yes, but that does not make you a racist. No one asked him it if was ok to have a sign that said "no white allowed" in a black community, or "no straight people allowed" in a gay community. His answer would have been the same.

If a restaurant opened up around Rand Paul that didn't allow blacks while he was in office, I could see him disgusted by it, protesting out in front of it, sending out flyers to help stop people from eating there, and hoping it goes out of business.

A Restaurant that does now allow black people (or any people as a group) would disgust Rand Paul. That does not mean just because he doesn't like it, he is going to make a law to stop it.

That's the problem today with everyone in office. They have a vision of how they think you should conduct yourself, and then try and pass law to force you to do so. The Constitution was written with the sole purpose of stopping that.

That's what freedom means. To be free to do anything you like that does not step on other peoples liberties, regardless of what other people think about it.


Yeah... now for a fun bit of real racism.

"The Vietnamese and the Republicans are, with an intensity, trying to take this seat from which we have done so much for our community — to take this seat and give it to this Van Tran, who is very anti-immigrant and very anti-Hispanic,

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0910/42673.html#ixzz10TV3XwdF
Point being, politicians in general are freakin crazy.
If you looked hard enough it's likely you'll find 3-4 crazy things in ANYBODIES closet it's just a matter of who's looking and why.
If there is anyone who doesn't have at least one politically damaging belief, viewpoint or event... I wouldn't want them as a politician because that's just, not normal and likely contrived from the get go knowing they wanted to be a politician from like age 8.


Kasz216 said:

Besides, are you kidding me...?  She practiced Wicca and this is considered a BAD step for the republcian party?

Religious diversity... well, almost anyway. 

Wicca actually is apparently one of the fastest growing religions out there as well for what it's worth.

That's what I find so hypocritical about this whole issue, especially coming from the Dems, or as they like to call themselves "the protector of the little guy."  They scream about religious freedom when there's a mosque being built near Ground Zero, but then a teenage girl tried Wicca and "OMG, SHE'S EVIL AND MUST BE STOPPED!" Where was this anti-Wicca platform before?  Hell, I bet some of their supporters practice Wicca.  Wonder if it will turn them off any come election day.