Aussious said:
MWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! YEAH I THINK YOU NEED NEW FRIENDS!Honestly its highly unlikely not because Kinect is better but simply because SONY is not very clear who exactly they are trying to sell this to were as with MS and Nintendo have made it perfectly clear from the onset, add to that the mediocre marketing push and so-so backing from SONY themselves I don't see it.
|
Wow, you do realize you just made it ENTIRELY clear you are an MS nutswinger. You don't post facts, you just laugh and say Kinect is better.
Sony has made it clear that their Move games are family oriented. I think that pretty much clears it up who they are pushing their software for. As for some of their 1st party games, they are shooters. Kind of obvious who shooters are directed to. If someone has to tell you, you must not be very intellectual. We should all know by now who Killzone 3 and SOCOM 4 are aimed at.
And the controllers are a bit lucrative when it comes to gameplay. The software based on them could be aimed at anyone. Children, adults, and even family oriented. Who the 3rd party software is aimed at is completely up to the developer. I think its safe to say that ALL motion control hardware is aimed at EVERYONE, unless its shaped like a cock and you don't spend most of your time with it in your hand.
Understood?
As for Sony having the most million sellers.... that doesn't have much to do with Move. Sure, move will probably score them ~5 million sellers during 2001, but its not going to give them the 40-50 its going to take to put them up there with the 360, especially after Kinect releases. Whether or not Sony ends up with the most million sellers is almost solely based on hardware sales. A larger userbase equals more million sellers. Even if the attach rate per console drops by 40%, twice as many consoles would still mean more million sellers.