By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - TV market share, LG > Sony

Reasonable said:
Squilliam said:

Doesn't LG = lifes good? Anyway, life must really be good for LG.

@Reasonable: You're wrong because I think you're wrong, ok?


That's okay, beacuse I think I'm right because I think I'm right!

Right now I'm buying mid-range, which for me would be Samsung or maybe LG, who I feel have improved a lot in recent years.

I tend to lean towards Panasonic at the higher end and prefer them overall.  Sony I find a shade better than Samsung and LG for image towards the higher end of the Sony range but I find Sony to feel pricing relative to the specifications.

So I'd probably only get a Sony TV if I found a specific deal that made it more appealing than the other options.

I think Sony advertise and push their TVs harder than Panasonic do, hence the order of the marketshare isn't really that much of a surprise to me as it's actually in line with how I view the price/marketing/image of the various vendors.

I own a high end Sony Bravia X series, does that make be like someone you should look up to? I think it does. Theres no shame in looking up to a TV owner with a better TV. We are consumers after all, isn't that our mission? To continually upgrade our TVs so that we can claim they are better than everyone else we know?

You know what the funny thing is with TVs? The technology is moving so fast that in some ways its better to buy a 'cheap' TV more often than to buy a top end TV for more and sit on it for 5 years. In the space of that 5 years you could buy a cheap TV then replace it once more with something better than the LCD you already had which will also be better than the LCD you would have bought anyway and as a bonus you'd have a spare set for the bedroom / kids and you would have ended up paying less for both than you did for the one. I can get 4 TVs which are better than the one I own for the price I paid at the time.



Tease.

Around the Network
Badassbab said:
Squilliam said:

Doesn't LG = lifes good? Anyway, life must really be good for LG.

@Reasonable: You're wrong because I think you're wrong, ok?

LG stands for Lucky Goldstar. In the West we have the slogan Life's Goood in the LG ads hence it's asociation. This was of course a deliberate marketing strategy by LG.

Does no one remember 'Goldstar' electronic goods from years gone by?

Thing with Sony is though they are top quality you do pay for the name as well.

They top our local reliability survey, Samsung is actually at the bottom for TV reliability.



Tease.

Squilliam said:

They top our local reliability survey, Samsung is actually at the bottom for TV reliability.


I have two Samsung sound systems, one blu ray 2.1  and one dvd 5.1 and they both have loud fans and the DVD playback is dodgy but both were good value. Still I wish I paid extra and bought the LG options.



Badassbab said:
Squilliam said:
 

They top our local reliability survey, Samsung is actually at the bottom for TV reliability.


I have two Samsung sound systems, one blu ray 2.1  and one dvd 5.1 and they both have loud fans and the DVD playback is dodgy but both were good value. Still I wish I paid extra and bought the LG options.

Well its hard to determine whether you're paying extra for quality or for brand when you buy something. Its one of the pitfalls of imperfect information.



Tease.

Squilliam said:

Doesn't LG = lifes good? Anyway, life must really be good for LG.

@Reasonable: You're wrong because I think you're wrong, ok?

Goldstar and another company in Korea (starts with L, but forgot the name) merged.  Now they are LG.



Around the Network

well i live in the uk,

i bought an LG as it was the only one i could afford last year,it's only a 27 inch and doesn't impress the ladies

but i like it and it does the job when i'm on my own



                                                                                                                                        Above & Beyond

   

zuvuyeay said:

well i live in the uk,

i bought an LG as it was the only one i could afford last year,it's only a 27 inch and doesn't impress the ladies

but i like it and it does the job when i'm on my own


LOL, not many ladies will be impressed with any tv. Especially the lady you are married to.



I LOVE paying for Xbox Live! I also love that my love for it pisses off so many people.

I love Samsung. I've had such great experiences with them, and my HD TV has been one of the best purchases my family has made.



Everyone needs to play Lost Odyssey! Any opposition to this and I will have to just say, "If it's a fight you want, you got it!"

Jordahn said:
raptors11 said:

Wow that's crazy! Didn't know LG was so big.

 

I vouch for Samsung and Panasonic but I've never had a Sony or LG TV.

Does anyone here swear by Sony or LG TV's?


I wouldn'tsay I swear by SONY when it comes to televisions, but I will say that you are gauranteed quality when you buy one.  Also, you are given a variety of in-menu options, allowing you to tweak the picture almost however you want given the technology you are buying.  What makes SONY stands from the rest goes beyond the general initial specs you would normally find on a sales website.  Their tweaking options go pretty deep.  But even with that, SONY has been doing a fine job of having the specs set to a more natural color right out of the box.


That's cool, sounds like a great TV. I'm not due for a new TV for a while but when I do Sony is a definite option.



One thing Sony suffers in this TV war is that their TV is just too damn ex in this kind of economic market, even me, the die hard Sony fan will look to Samsung with similar technology and quality but with more user friendly price. Their Cybershot Cameras are also damn ex compare to similar offers from Panasonic and Samsung, especially when they offer 'water-resistance' Cybershot in the same range of price with Panasonic 'water-proof' offer, which is no match at all.

Their Alpha cameras on the other hand are dirtcheap compare with bigshots like Canon and Nikon, they should have kept the Konica name to please the old DSLR users, sort of like Sony Konica. I got an entry level cheap Alpha which is not bad at all.

Sony Ericsson on the other hand should just work superclosely with Google and ditch Windows Mobile or Symbian, they make a super sexy phone X10 which come with.....Android 1.6???

The Sony electronics just make so many mistakes in so many fronts, that they simply have to iron them out.