http://plasmastation.weebly.com/halo-reach-early-review.html

9.6

Gameplay: 10

Sound: 9.5

Story: 9.5

Graphics: 9.5

http://www.strengthgamer.com/Halo_Reach_Review.html

10/10

Graphics 9.5/10

Story 10/10

Playability 10/10

Replayability 10/10

Originality N/A

waiting for more

I'd to love agree but some people love to hate Halo.

You will get Eurogamer Spain/Italy and whatever else giving it 7's etc.

Are these just blog reviews by no name sights aka are they legit enough to be on metacritic and gamerankings?

No name sites or not they are the first reviews and are very interesting :).

What's up Halo Heads..

Here's a review from yours truly. Now before everybody gets a crazy on me. Please note that I am not a HUGE Halo fan and with this in mind please watch the HD Halo Review here http://www.dasreviews.com/featured/halo-reach-video-review-hd/

Hope that gives you guys/girls some insight on what to buy.

No name sites are better than the larger controlled corporate media sites that push trash your way because they are paid by the publishers to do just that.

Embargos is always depend on reviews itself. If they are positive then it will be earlier and if they are negative then we should expect last day reviews.

Sometimes true but also for your site who starts and ends the review with pre order the game at our site now!  Nobody expect a bad review from a site like dasreview :).

So true.

But still reviews only matter in console wars. And in console wars you use a big well known site because of thick skull fanboys.

And I hate how foreign sites such as famitsu gets is more creditable than small sites in NA. Famitsu is so biased they will rate Reach a 7 or 8.

I played it today.

Not for long, and just had a fly around Forge World... But it looks great.

I get it either Saturday or Monday. So excited!!