Not applicable? :S

Yeah it says Microsoft Kinect not X360, so they're right with the N/A

Thats not what I meant. You wouldnt think PSMove can do much more? How can the consumer know they arent applicable/available because it sucks or because its a different thing all in all?

:P I'm not sure if anyone will think that far. Usually I tend to go with Not applicable when I see N/A...either way I do not see any other way than than using N/A in the chart..maybe word it out word by word? which No one will do

I dont see other solution either, apart from not doing a comparison chart with something that isnt made to do the same. They could aswell mention what Kinect can do that Move cannot, and write N/A for the Move column. But we know why they didnt. That was my only grip at the chart, else the presentation is very nice. I always analyse marketing a lot because thats what I studied and work in. Beside, I would have done the same as Sony if I needed to valued my product over another.

The pointer of Wii is limited compared to the Move one.

In the Wii, wiimote must be pointing directly to the Tv, whatever you do, it just lose the tracking.

In Move, The camera is always seeing move when you are using a pointer, so it doesn't stop tracking.

Aside from the "N/A" confusion thing, pretty good. They should have a sidenote that says "N/A=Not Applicable". I don't understand though how "Color Changing Sphere" is considered a plus though lol.

I would consider the sphere a plus if used correctly. I can see a lot of games using the colour changing aspect as part of the game e.g Sorcery using it to show you what spell you are using. multiplayer games showing you who is who. Thinking outside the box, there's potential there.

Exactly what I was about to type...Sorcery showed how it can be a very nice plus for gameplay

It's a visual effect? People like visuals :P