M.U.G.E.N said:
Icyedge said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
Icyedge said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
Icyedge said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
Icyedge said:
The only problem I see with the chart is using the term N/A, which mean not available, its usually perceive as missing a feature. But in this case, its not like Kinect is really missing a feature, they are comparing 2 different thing. Im able too!!!
PSP PS3
Display yes N/A
|
N/A = Not Applicable?
|
Wait it can be use for both.
|
lol yeah but clearly that's why it's used here
|
Yes, but if your a consumer who dont really know what is PSmove and what is Kinect. What would you think?
|
Not applicable? :S
|
Thats not what I meant. You wouldnt think PSMove can do much more? How can the consumer know they arent applicable/available because it sucks or because its a different thing all in all?
|
:P I'm not sure if anyone will think that far. Usually I tend to go with Not applicable when I see N/A...either way I do not see any other way than than using N/A in the chart..maybe word it out word by word? which No one will do
|
I dont see other solution either, apart from not doing a comparison chart with something that isnt made to do the same. They could aswell mention what Kinect can do that Move cannot, and write N/A for the Move column. But we know why they didnt. That was my only grip at the chart, else the presentation is very nice. I always analyse marketing a lot because thats what I studied and work in. Beside, I would have done the same as Sony if I needed to valued my product over another.
