"ok so in this site, u can't say anything remotely negative towards microsoft"

Oh look, you posted a negative Microsoft thread and you aint banned

OT, the games look good graphic wise to me, so that's all that matters

And around and around we go....

this just news O.o, i just found no one made a thread.

now if darth let me post something on sony forums.

Even better, I don't need a 150 dollar camera to dance!

News just in. 

Apparantly Kinect is fun to play. 

Wait Fun doesnt matter anymore. 

Sorry wrong thread.

the sensor the bought parts some months ago were 1.3mpx CMOS for pictures, 640x480 30fps video. natal projects

in contrast ps eye is 2mpx 640x480p 60fps , 320x240 120fps video, also they working omnivision for better low light operation.

well i only just reported him. Give the mods a chance to react.

I think this points to Microsoft having doubts just how success Kinect will be so they cut back on it's hardware to keep from selling them at a loss. No doubt many 360 fans here will likely to pay $150 for Kinect.  It's the same  people over at a sim racing forum is likely to pay hundreds of dollars for wheels and rigs.

I'm surprised by this ...

While I'm certain Microsoft wouldn't make this change without first testing the consequences, I would expect that a lower resolution camera would make Kinect far less precise; and would increase the number and severity of errors. Although, this could also be the result of Microsoft changing the scope of what Kinect is, and by that I mean that some of the hardware could have been choosen for capturing more complicated and expressive motions (hands/face), or could have been choosen to open the use of the system by more players, and with limited interest from developers for this extra functionality it doesn't make much sense to have the hardware for it (at this point in time).