Tighter immigration laws. Reduce immigration rates. Police need to be enforcing the law and arresting the criminal and terrorists. The police are doing their job. These freeloading illegal immigrants could be drug dealers or terrorists. Papers need to be verified, it would not be in America's best interests to allow criminals or terrorists into the country who could cause trouble in America. 

If your illegal GTFO! If you are legal than STFU and stop worrying about it. Police have to have reasonable cause for requesting someone`s citizenship status. All you legal immigrants need to back your country instead of supporting our country becoming ruined by illegals taking jobs away from US citizens, abusing our food stamp system and health care system as well as those that are simply smuggling drugs or are criminals of some kind.

Every state should do this then those illegals will have nowhere to run but out. Thats what we all want anyways. Go back to Cuba, go back to China, go back to Mexico(not singling out these places I know we get illegals from everywhere, these are just the big 3). IDC care where you go...just get out of our country if you not interested in being a citiszen of our country or getting a green card then you have no right to be here unless you have a passport of some kind.

I'll be honest- it doesn't bother me one bit. I've no problem with people who want to go through the legal avenue of becoming a citizen; welcome to the US! But too many of them come into this country, have a kid, and then leech off the system. There will be some shrinking pains, but for safety and unity, I think this is a good thing. And related, someone mentioned how speaking English was a requirement for citizenship. That's also good; it means that in a time of crisis, a message can be said once, and be understood by everyone. I'm even willing to cut people slack who are trying to learn the language. But if you've been here for, say, 4 years, and all the English you know is "No speak English" (and more often than not, it's Spanish they speak), then I've got another one for you: "Si usted no habla ingles, la salida esta detras de ti." Or, in more crude terms, "Get the fuck out!" The key thing to remember, is that this only applies to those who DON'T know English. If you know more languages, good for you.

But then again, I've always been a fan of kicking out people who don't belong here, who almost insist that those who have been here have to bend around to accomodate them. This also includes those who require us to pay for expensive services in other languages. And yes, I also apply these rules to myself- I won't go to Spain unless I feel I can at least try to carry on a conversation in Spanish. If you come here, you better at least try to do one in English. And the problem is that many of the illegal ones don't. What really pisses me off is how some areas (I'm looking at you, southern Florida) pander to those here illegally. But that's drifting toward a different topic...

Arizona's trying to pass a law for that, and if the current law is constitutionally shady, that next one is lunacy in their part. Like Arizona wants to waste money on a Supreme Court battle that's a guaranteed loss

Please point me to where citizens have to speak English.  Since the USA has no offical language, it is not required in any way at all for citizens to speak English.  They are highly encouraged to speak it, but in no way required.

this again? (grabs popcorn)

really? Antibiotics? HIV/Aids? Sterile Technique? Carcinogens? Vitamins? Cancers? Vaccines? 

I wonder how roosevelt would feel had we developed a polio vaccine 40 years sooner.

Id say a man speaking on "american values" nearly a hundred years ago who never  was exposed to the 1960's or many other civil rights movements, kosovo, sudan, iraq, WW2 really doesnt have a grasp of where our country is at or the world for that matter in 2010.

The new changed law doesn't bother me much but the fact that when it first got signed into law, they had (correct me if I am wrong) printed in it where police could stop anyone who "looked illegal". That's why this Arizona law became a headline across the nation especially within the Hispanic community. The only people who could "look illegal" were minorities. Afterwards the Arizona law was changed so police could only ask someone who looked suspicious if they had done an offense. When that change occurred I became in favor for it, but then something from Arizona came out that changed my perspective. *Someone within Arizona was trying to pass a law that would not give "anchor babies" birth certificates.* I am not a Harvard student yet but I know it's against the U.S constitution. Given that and the fact that there is a Hitler imitator there (Joe Arpaio) makes me believe that Arizona is a racist state. 

The other thing that irritates me is that legal residents like me would have to bring all documents where ever they go. If failed to do so I could become a criminal. Given that I didn't read an age restriction makes me liable for bringing my papers.

The other thing that worries me is profiling, something which has already happened even though it hasn't passed yet.

So you're basically saying because some things from 100 years ago are invalid, updated, or disproven then all things from 100 years ago must also be wrong?

Shit everybody, the Earth is torus!