You don't know people who have gotten pregnant despite using condoms, IUDs, diaphragms, etc.?

Man you must know some hella lucky people. Basically, your basic assunption is extremely wrong, so your argument fails. So yes, it's normal. Meanwhile even if homosexual sex involves any number of contraceptives, hell even without using them, there is 0% chance, a literal 0% chance at any conception. Hence, not normal at all.

Have sex witho whoever you want and whoever many people you want, I really don't care. However don't try to pass some things which are not normal as normal because that's more likely for me to go with "no right at all" instead of "rights for everyone." If I had to choose between homosexuality being normal and no rights whatsoever for homosexuals, I'd go with the latter. Thankfully the world doesn't work solely with black and white.

That's horse manure. Just as an example, classical Greek society actually elevated homosexual relationships as being more pure than heterosexual ones, and classical Japanese society saw nothing particularly wrong with men sexing up young boys.

What? Why? Why would you.... what?

Someone really should take a look at it, because as far as i know it's only the Judeo-Christian tradition that has a particular grudge against homosexuality, and that largely stems from this strong sense of self-preservation among the ancient Hebrews (and other Semitic tribes), that also caused them to ban a lot of other things

(and it wasn't an issue of: homosexuality is bad because it's not reproductively effecient, but rather homosexuality is bad because that's what the other cultures around us do, and we're not like them, same reason they won't eat shellfish. It also may have had something to do with preserving civil order, as adult men were almost always married, so them having sex with each other was going to lead to family fueds and such)

Point being, what have other societies actually said. We've here described the Semites, Mediterraneans, and Japanese, but what of the Chinese, Indians, Africans, and Native Americans?

If I had to choose between homosexuals having rights and having homosexuality being considered as normal, and not giving homosexuals any of the heterosexual rights, I would go with not giving them the rights. What part of it did you not understand?

You're definition of "normal" is highly flawed.

No I am actually fairly sure it is very accurate. For non-asexual species for a normal pair, couple, etc. to a be normal pair, couple, etc. they would need to be able to produce another of its species. Homosexuals can't hence not normal. When humans begin reproducing asexually, I can reconsider.

Hahahaha. Maybe if the kid is a boy he'll have two manly dads.

Can men and women still mary there?

Oh good he's banned.

Your posts were "abnormal" so you got banned nerner