Seece said:
mirgro said:
dtewi said:
mirgro said:
Great to hear there are more advanced nations out there that aren't slowed down by pathetic, antiquated, and obsolete ideas.
That said, I am fine with rights for gays, but I hate it when they try to pass themselves off as "normal." When the human race becomes asexual and you don't need a male and a female for new humans to be made then they can start off with the whole "normal" argument. Until then, I am sorry, but it is not normal.
|
Having sex for pleasure is not normal since it doesn't create new humans.
I mean, according to you, that's true, right?
|
No you completely misunderstood what I was saying. They can have as much sex as they want, but there will be no new human mande out of it, hence it can't be normal.
The reason we have evolved sex to be pleasureable was to encourage us to have it and reproduce and make more of our kind. So even theoretically, yes having sex without chance at reproduction is not normal.
|
SO hetro sex with a condom isn't normal?
|
You don't know people who have gotten pregnant despite using condoms, IUDs, diaphragms, etc.?
Man you must know some hella lucky people. Basically, your basic assunption is extremely wrong, so your argument fails. So yes, it's normal. Meanwhile even if homosexual sex involves any number of contraceptives, hell even without using them, there is 0% chance, a literal 0% chance at any conception. Hence, not normal at all.
Have sex witho whoever you want and whoever many people you want, I really don't care. However don't try to pass some things which are not normal as normal because that's more likely for me to go with "no right at all" instead of "rights for everyone." If I had to choose between homosexuality being normal and no rights whatsoever for homosexuals, I'd go with the latter. Thankfully the world doesn't work solely with black and white.
