By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Bobby Kotick frustrated by the Xbox Live business model

Torillian said:
KylieDog said:
Euphoria14 said:

Call of Duty isn't pay to play, so why should he get any of the money from LIVE?

The online features of MW2 while P2P in-game do require servers for other parts.  If some people really do pay for LIVE for CoD why shouldn't they recieve something to offset the server costs?

ok so there are servers somewhere that Activision themselves have to maintain?  Then I can see why they should get some of the money from XBL, but it would be hard to figure out how much.

This only works in the case where they go to Microsoft before entering into an agreement about being hosted on XBL.

If they take it on themselves to incurr more expenses, that doesn't entitle them to get anything from Microsoft's revenue.



Around the Network

Bobby Kotick is frustrated because he knows that its just a matter of time before Call of Duty falls from its epic heights in sales.



He just wants money.  He wants to charge a monthly fee to play CoD online, and probably feels people will be unlikely to bite if they're already paying to play online in general.  Thus, he has issues with XBL.



That sucks for Activision. I know they are struggling with the 20 million copies of MW2 and the millions of map packs that gamers have bought. Activision exudes greediness.



Guys Greed is what you basicly get when you buy Activision's crap....So Why not stop like I have??



Around the Network
Lyrikalstylez said:

Guys Greed is what you basicly get when you buy Activision's crap....So Why not stop like I have??


you should tell that to the millions of CoD fans, they don't even know who Bobby Ticktock is.



I live for the burn...and the sting of pleasure...
I live for the sword, the steel, and the gun...

- Wasteland - The Mission.

WilliamWatts said:

Bobby Kotick is frustrated because he knows that its just a matter of time before Call of Duty falls from its epic heights in sales.


this



KylieDog said:


The online features of MW2 while P2P in-game do require servers for other parts.  If some people really do pay for LIVE for CoD why shouldn't they recieve something to offset the server costs?

Because they do nothing to help maintain XBL at all. They added online multiplayer not because of Microsoft, but because they thought it would help sell the game. They do no work for the service, thus they have no rights to any revenue from said service. When they start to host and maintain XBL matchmaking servers they might have a point. Until then they are just making noise.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

Oh waawaa Bobby, you can go screw yourself.   He's just pissed cause he knows Halo Reach is gonna be 10 times better then his new COD and have many more people playing it online.



Mw3 Pay to play confirmed. $60 a month lol.



Atto Suggests...:

Book - Malazan Book of the Fallen series 

Game - Metro Last Light

TV - Deadwood

Music - Forest Swords