By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Iwata earns $770k basic salary, Miyamoto gets $1.3 million!

kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:

they earn much more throught their share



so will Stringer...


SONY has a loss

 

so he won't get naything on his shares

 

also Stringer has does not have a big share in SONY but was mostly appointed as he was american and because his management skills


What are you talking about?  

A share still has a value if a company makes a loss... and a company can still pay a dividend if a company makes a loss. 

I'm not sure you have any idea about this.


but how much will they pay if they make a loss compared to profits

Well his salary was 4.5m and he got 4m in shares... see my post above.  He is clearely grossly overpaid for the japanese marketplace and amongst his peers. 

WESTERN employees thrive on bonuses



Around the Network
sethnintendo said:

Looks like the thread got more focused on Stringer.  You can blame me for that.

Yeah maybe I should of edited that part out of the article.

However I think the amount of money Nintendo employees make is well deserved especially considering how successful the company is.

Nintendo really does print money :)

  



kowenicki said:
Arcturus said:
sethnintendo said:

Looks like Sony is overpaying for their CEO....

Is he really overpaid if Sony earned $80B in revenue over the past year versus Nintendo with $5.6B?



lol...

And one ALWAYS made a proifit, the other hasn't for 2 years.

Revenue is vanity... Profit is reality.

As ShadowSnake mentioned, I was merely pointing out that the two companies are quite different in size and therefore you can't directly compare compension levels as easily as they were.



kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:

they earn much more throught their share



so will Stringer...


SONY has a loss

 

so he won't get naything on his shares

 

also Stringer has does not have a big share in SONY but was mostly appointed as he was american and because his management skills


What are you talking about?  

A share still has a value if a company makes a loss... and a company can still pay a dividend if a company makes a loss. 

I'm not sure you have any idea about this.


but how much will they pay if they make a loss compared to profits

Well his salary was 4.5m and he got 4m in shares... see my post above.  He is clearely grossly overpaid for the japanese marketplace and amongst his peers. 

WESTERN employees thrive on bonuses



So now, from your last two posts, you agree he is paid much more than his peers but it is just because he is western... 

So he walked into the job as CEO and said you must pay me more becuase I am from the west... ??  I see.


normally WESTERNERS are payed more bonus and thrive on it

he could have demanded more  depeding on how he performs.alot of bonuses are depended on the conttract he has signed and the revenues company made

 

the SONY shareholders wouldn't have signed him because of his high salary but because westnerners get the job done and are strict which was what SONY needed at that time



kowenicki said:
Arcturus said:
kowenicki said:
Arcturus said:
sethnintendo said:

Looks like Sony is overpaying for their CEO....

Is he really overpaid if Sony earned $80B in revenue over the past year versus Nintendo with $5.6B?



lol...

And one ALWAYS made a proifit, the other hasn't for 2 years.

Revenue is vanity... Profit is reality.

As ShadowSnake mentioned, I was merely pointing out that the two companies are quite different in size and therefore you can't directly compare compension levels as easily as they were.

Ok...

Which is why I then posted the article which compared him with the CEO's of  similar companies...

Sorry, but there isn't much information in that article to make a good comparison.



Around the Network
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:

they earn much more throught their share



so will Stringer...


SONY has a loss

 

so he won't get naything on his shares

 

also Stringer has does not have a big share in SONY but was mostly appointed as he was american and because his management skills


What are you talking about?  

A share still has a value if a company makes a loss... and a company can still pay a dividend if a company makes a loss. 

I'm not sure you have any idea about this.


but how much will they pay if they make a loss compared to profits

Well his salary was 4.5m and he got 4m in shares... see my post above.  He is clearely grossly overpaid for the japanese marketplace and amongst his peers. 

WESTERN employees thrive on bonuses



So now, from your last two posts, you agree he is paid much more than his peers but it is just because he is western... 

So he walked into the job as CEO and said you must pay me more becuase I am from the west... ??  I see.


normally WESTERNERS are payed more bonus and thrive on it

he could have demanded more  depeding on how he performs.alot of bonuses are depended on the conttract he has signed and the revenues company made

 

the SONY shareholders wouldn't have signed him because of his high salary but because westnerners get the job done and are strict which was what SONY needed at that time

He became CEO in 2005.... they will still profitable then...

they were but the expenses of developing CELL,BLU-RAY were already made.

 

they couldn't just drop it and say it was too expensive so we didn't implement it

 

also everybody knew that SONY was gonna have a loss no matter what but thwen it is a future and people are seeing now from this year,its  profit



9m? that would last me a life time or 2



That's a funny coincidence. Miyamoto's paycheque is about the same size as the profit that the average Nintendo employee generates for the company:

http://www.smartcompany.com.au/information-technology/nintendo-has-the-most-valuable-employees-in-the-world.html



"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event."  — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.

kowenicki said:
Arcturus said:
kowenicki said:
Arcturus said:
sethnintendo said:

Looks like Sony is overpaying for their CEO....

Is he really overpaid if Sony earned $80B in revenue over the past year versus Nintendo with $5.6B?



lol...

And one ALWAYS made a proifit, the other hasn't for 2 years.

Revenue is vanity... Profit is reality.

As ShadowSnake mentioned, I was merely pointing out that the two companies are quite different in size and therefore you can't directly compare compension levels as easily as they were.

Ok...

Which is why I then posted the article which compared him with the CEO's of  similar companies...

Except they're not that similar at all...

You're comparing Nintendo who does Video Game Hardware/Software and merchandise related to them; ONE GENERAL MARKET.

vs.

Sony who does all of the above Music, Film, Consumer Electronics, PCs/Laptops, Computer Software, Phones, Financial/Banking Services, IT services, and Industrial Components such as semiconductors.

Comparing the salaries of a singular market leader vs a conglomerate is silly.  Unless you believe Stringer is as involved in the gaming segment as Iwata is.  Which is laughable. 



kowenicki said:
Arcturus said:
kowenicki said:
Arcturus said:
sethnintendo said:

Looks like Sony is overpaying for their CEO....

Is he really overpaid if Sony earned $80B in revenue over the past year versus Nintendo with $5.6B?



lol...

And one ALWAYS made a proifit, the other hasn't for 2 years.

Revenue is vanity... Profit is reality.

As ShadowSnake mentioned, I was merely pointing out that the two companies are quite different in size and therefore you can't directly compare compension levels as easily as they were.

Ok...

Which is why I then posted the article which compared him with the CEO's of  similar companies...

the article did not make a single comparison to any other CEO in japan.

anyway, i was talking internationally. He might be one of the highest paid CEO's of a japanese based company, as the article stated, but that's not what I meant when I mentioned his salary was quite fair compared to a lot of other CEO's (around the world). Here in Canada, there's a lot of CEO's who make more than he does, even in much smaller companies.