By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:

they earn much more throught their share



so will Stringer...


SONY has a loss

 

so he won't get naything on his shares

 

also Stringer has does not have a big share in SONY but was mostly appointed as he was american and because his management skills


What are you talking about?  

A share still has a value if a company makes a loss... and a company can still pay a dividend if a company makes a loss. 

I'm not sure you have any idea about this.


but how much will they pay if they make a loss compared to profits

Well his salary was 4.5m and he got 4m in shares... see my post above.  He is clearely grossly overpaid for the japanese marketplace and amongst his peers. 

WESTERN employees thrive on bonuses



So now, from your last two posts, you agree he is paid much more than his peers but it is just because he is western... 

So he walked into the job as CEO and said you must pay me more becuase I am from the west... ??  I see.


normally WESTERNERS are payed more bonus and thrive on it

he could have demanded more  depeding on how he performs.alot of bonuses are depended on the conttract he has signed and the revenues company made

 

the SONY shareholders wouldn't have signed him because of his high salary but because westnerners get the job done and are strict which was what SONY needed at that time

He became CEO in 2005.... they will still profitable then...

they were but the expenses of developing CELL,BLU-RAY were already made.

 

they couldn't just drop it and say it was too expensive so we didn't implement it

 

also everybody knew that SONY was gonna have a loss no matter what but thwen it is a future and people are seeing now from this year,its  profit