man you watched 25 minutes of that?

Best game catalogue >>>> best game exclusives

Wii has both anyways.

old videos are old videos, nough said

You're not getting the point. I saw you post this same thing on the video. Gears of War or Dead Rising don't just "not exist" anymore.

Dead Rising is different on the Wii, and isn't even a 70 or above. Gears of War is on the PC. So it's NOT exclusive! Yea, you can't play it on the PS3, but that doesn't mean I have to buy a 360 to play it. Why can't you understand that? 

LOL how GeneralMLD changed the terminology again. "360-Multiplat: Not on PS3". So? Again, if you don't need a 360, it's doesn't matter. That's all we care about (using his word choice). Hell, like BBC said, people with Macs and Linux can get those games too

That video isn't old though, its from 3 days ago.

The guy said: Give this video to any X360 owner and have fun watching them rage. So please continue xD.

As for watching it due to its length, you can quickly just go to the PS3 and X360 list or even checkout Wii and PC if you want to see that. I had 30 minutes off and why not watch an entertaining video (in my opinion >:D)

PEACE!

What matters to people is that a system has sufficient amount of games for it that people want to play.  It is entirely possible that if more than one system has this, then people can own more than one system.  There is no law against it.  This is why you look at the entire library, and what is available, and see if it matters to you.  If a system has more games, or even more exclusives, but they of less interest to someone than a system with less of both, but has certain titles that are must have, that is what matters.  Same goes with system functions:

* If someone cares about the best feature points for integrated online play, AND is willing to pay for it (plus the system has the games they want), then the 360 is a better choice than the 360.  Also factor in wanting to get demos of every game.  The 360 has this, while the PS3 doesn't.  Same goes with wanting fullbody motion control, as opposed to just mapping hands.

* If someone wants a Blu-Ray player, and a game machine, then the PS3 is the choice... if the person feels the library is large enough.  On this, it doesn't mean JACK that the games are exclusive or not.  Suddenly getting a Blu-Ray player that plays football isn't an option, because Madden (or FIFA) is on the 360?  And the same goes with if you want a more accurate version of the Wii controls and play in HD (and more hardcore games), as the PS3 is the best choice.

* If someone wants Mario, and inexpensive motion control, and also old NES or SNES games that can play on their TV, then the Wii is the best choice. 

* If you want a cell phone that plays games, and has a large library, then the iPhone is the option.

* Want portable 3D gaming that doesn't need glasses?  Well, you then have the 3DS.

What matters to people is the total package of what you get with the system now, and until the end of the life cycle.  Anything else is just fanboy fodder.  And it gets VERY tiring.  And yes, you will likely want to "Yeah but..." what I wrote above.  If you are a fanboy, then you will look at the minutia, rather than the point I am making. 

The reality is that people don't play exclusives, or entire libraries. People play GAMES.  They use content.  They don't use scoreboard items.  The concept of "library size" or "exclusives" is irrelevant to the discussion, unless you are a fanboy trying to keep score.  Well, it is also possibly good you look at this to understand the videogame industry, to be wiser.   BUT, this understanding should make you more balanced, not a fanboy.

And I will close with this line to the Neo-Geo theme song: OK so we all know that Neo Geo MVS arcade cabinet is the best thing to ever exist on the planet. That's obvious. If you were born then you know that. If you don't know that then you're technically not alive. So you might wanna get that checked out.

Aren't there like millions of videos like this? Just with different view points. I don't why this is so special and no, I'm not watching someone talk for 25 minutes telling me what I should get.

So is every one going to ignore richardhutnik's posts?

And will the PS3 "lovers" stop attempting to be smug? You're not qualitatively and objectively correct, you know.

I won't worry about it.  Either I am being killfilter, or people are reading it (or not if this thread is too long).  And I will comment that the 360 fan video reply did reek of fanboyism.  It made a few points, but the rest was the thinking of a fanboy.  For people who are buying a videogame system, they could care less what Microsoft wants and wants to counter regarding what Sony is doing.  The idea of "not on the PS3" as a main criterion is a moot too.  It doesn't help anyone outside of someone who is emotionally invested in something put out by Microsoft, as helping Microsoft assimilate the world is a GOOD thing.

I have seen companies rise in fall in my time.  It is best not to get too overly attached to anyone... unless they are Atari (have some props man!) .  Or Neo-Geo (See the post above).