axt113 said:
As for the bleeding of low skilled jobs, its not just China, but dozens of countries which are competing with the US for those jobs, going after China won't stem the tide, this was inevitable. The problem right now is not high debt and deficit, so your argument is flawed, the problem is the economic downturn, the only solution at the moment is to maintain deficit spending until the economy reaches a point where it can sustain itself, then to begin pulling back spending. The Debt and Deficit are more long term problems, we should keep an eye on certainly, but trying to solve that will only prevent us from dealing with the current ongoing problem. You're worried about something that isn't really a problem at the moment and ignoring the thing that is the problem right now.
|
Too much debt from both the government and the individual CAUSED the crisis, and all further debt-driven spending will do is make the crisis worse and delay it for a short period of time. I’m talking about outcomes 3 to 5 years down the road at the current rate which can be averted IF YOU DO SOMETHING NOW; all government stimulus will do is the same thing it has done already, and that is temporarily increase productivity by front loading demand and when the stimulus is gone the demand will fall to a lower level (because everyone who would have bought in over the next 12 months was attracted by the temporary incentives).
I’m one of those weird people who was reading about and warning people of the housing bubble in 2003 and 2004 and back then people had the same attitude as you have now; essentially "Its not an immediate problem so why should we do anything about it?" ... In 5 to 10 years you'll be wishing the US only had 15% unemployment.