Marked for later reading.  And playing if I'm lucky.

(I'm back from vacation.)

Posting for work so apologies if unable to go into detail.

I came out strongly on Gnizmo as I was sure that I was not out on Night 1. If someone can reconcile this with Gnizmo's claim than that is more than welcome.

Also just to clarify: you are out when you use an ability or if you are mafia, is that correct?

Now on my defense: at this point it is my word against Gnizmo's. Given the game I'd say that if you lynch one of us two and check the outcome this could prove useful to see who is lying. My concern is that with three lynches per night this can lead town to lose.

I put forth my reasoning as to why I think Gnizmo is scum and logical arguments for the case. You can check this out in the earlier post.

Given the situation, I want to character claim. My character is Blanka and I have a useful shock ability which I have not yet put to use. It can be used just once but do not wish to go into details what it does at this point.

No one has challenged Gnizmo's character claim right?

Btw before going Blanka = green monster, please note that he is a good character in the game, whose storyline goes something along the lines of wanting to join mama.

Also he is the character I main in SSFIV - if anyone wants a fight add me on PSN (Fufinu)

/aside

Green monster!!!

Kill him with fire!  Or a noose!

Seriously though, we were told SF alignments may not go with the alignments in game, though so far they have....

Given the recent situation where the bad guys were mafia and the good guys were townies...could the real blanka challenge him if he is lying ?

He could... but he could be telling the truth that he is Blanka, it doesn't mean he is pro or anti town... He would have to be the dumbest person in the world to false name claim at this point

There is one other remote possibility for why you would be out at night, but you would be aware of the "ability." I won't name it, but I imagine some of the other players know what I mean. I also don't get why you keep over stating your case in trying to get me lynched. Your guilt does not relate to my innocence. Trying to relate the two only makes me more suspicious of you.

I will give you some advice from one player to another ignoring all of what is going on right now. You need to lay all your cards on the table. There is a reason I was playing my hand close to my chest, and there is a reason I abandoned that strategy. It would have been better for the town if I hadn't had to reveal all of that, but it was what was needed to show I could be trusted. You are in a much worse position than I was. Holding back is going to get you lynched at this stage.

Conclusion :

There is a mafia bus driver ROFLing his ass off at this whole situation.

Well Blanka, the way I see it is that you have put yourself in this situation. You not only refused to give any infor when confronted (which would be midly suspicious only), but you laid a crusade against the one guy the cop had just cleared.... and persisted until votes started falling on you.

I dunno why we're switching targets though, as if j0 really is mafia, getting rid of him would mean one less kill tonight (whereas Fufinu would be just one of group B).

In any case I haven't seen any redeeming arguments for either of them that outweights the many arguments against. But we can't lynch 2 guys... I'd say pick one and finish the discution on him, there we've got two paths and we can't take both today. I'm in favor of j0 for today, but i'll switch if the vote count rises for Fufinu.

If we leave J0 and he is Mafia group A and there are 3 Mafia Group B then we have a 21% chance he will nightkill a Mafia group B member 3 Mafia members / 14 remaining people.

Actually the odds are a little better in that I don't think he will go after me, as I am probably protected..

If you switched your vote to Fufinu then both would be at 5 votes...