By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - An internet-wide CNET boycott.

@ dtewi

Where have you been, under a rock?

Jeff Gertmanns, a 10 year long employee of GS, gave Kane and Lynch a 6 out of 10.

Eidos was paying huge $ in advertising for Kane and Lynch on Gamespot. The new advertising lead guy has been trying to have more influence in the edtioral nature of Gamespot.

So basically he was fired because he a low score whenever the publisher was paying big bucks to advertise the game.

I did a terrible job summarizing it. Check Kotaku, N4G, etc.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Around the Network
Rath said:
dtewi said:
Maybe I'm just not informed on the subject.

What has CNET done anyway?

Essentially fired a guy for being honest in a review and not giving it a better review because an advertiser paid big bucks.


 If it is true and an advertsier paid for a batter evie then it become a worthless site for reviews.

Although I suspect it has been going on for years in magazines,  on the internet and with shop product placement.



I vowed long time ago to never go on Gamespot so that not a problem and i visit CNET now and then but not anymore.




I havent logged into my gamespot account for like 2 years and have no plans to.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 

Thanks guys. If you can, spread the word to other sites. If any of you are members of NeoGAF, that would really help.



---------------
The Board is the best site on the Internet.

Around the Network
llewdebkram said:
Rath said:
dtewi said:
Maybe I'm just not informed on the subject.

What has CNET done anyway?

Essentially fired a guy for being honest in a review and not giving it a better review because an advertiser paid big bucks.


If it is true and an advertsier paid for a batter evie then it become a worthless site for reviews.

Although I suspect it has been going on for years in magazines, on the internet and with shop product placement.

Bingo.  I think from now on I'm only going off of what peer reviews and small time sites say about games.

 



Never use my gamespot account anyways...

One of the reason being, the mods there really suck.



That's why i never go by reviews. The guy should have paid attention to what the higher ups had told him. Yea it's wrong but at least the guy would still have a job. This is most likely a common practice in the industry.



Auron said:
That's why i never go by reviews. The guy should have paid attention to what the higher ups had told him. Yea it's wrong but at least the guy would still have a job. This is most likely a common practice in the industry.

 Sometimes you have to stand up for what you believe is right no matter what the consequences may be,

If the guy knew his employers were being paid to write a biased review then his actions should be applauded and as many people as possible should do what tehy can to show they will not put up with it.

If people remain complacent and never do anything when they find out companies are being less than honest; especially when ultimately it is at our expense, all big companies will continue to rip us off and do as they please



I've been boycotting them for over a year and a half now haha.