you need to play GT5, there is a room were there is a behind the scene HEAD TRACKING MOVE/3D demo that floored people
I just wish that i could of seen it in 3D. I was depressed watching it in 2d over the internet.
Gamespot said similar things but seemed impressed overall. Having things jump out of the screen at you is just an old gimmick. It's more about giving depth to the picture. Killzone 3 is still pre-alpha, anyway.
JamaicameCRAZY said:
How big of a hit exactly? These games your talking about are potentialy the new graphical kings of their genre so they can afford to take a hit. |
Big enough to take away that title. It was kind of like the graphical level of Resistance 2's online component. Probably a bit better looking than that still, but very noticeably worse than the 2D versions of the game.
Do you have any experience in viewing 3D games prior to the show? Like have you seen Metro 2033 in 3D on the PC (best looking 3D title on the market right now) How does it compare?
| disolitude said: Do you have any experience in viewing 3D games prior to the show? Like have you seen Metro 2033 in 3D on the PC (best looking 3D title on the market right now) How does it compare? |
This was my first 3D gaming experience. The only thing I really have to compare it with is movie style 3D, which could be why I was disappointed. That and the level of waiting I had to endure and my leg pain from standing/walking all day 
nightsurge said:
This was my first 3D gaming experience. The only thing I really have to compare it with is movie style 3D, which could be why I was disappointed. That and the level of waiting I had to endure and my leg pain from standing/walking all day |
I see. Yeah I'd be curious how well this looks compared to top notch 3D on the PC.
The thing with 3D is that it has to be carefully matched up with proper games, engines and experiences.
Invincible Tiger for exmaple...the worst 3D implementation in the history of gaming. That game does not need 3D as the effects are not made for it.
Crysis 1 aslo was not a good 3D game as it had visuals and engine which did not give a great depth feeling (due to too many 2D textures)
Left 4 dead on the PC on the other hand...great engine for 3D, blood splater on screen... simply amazing.
What Im saying here is that Killzone 3 may be an amazing game, but it may not be the best experience for the 3D effect.
disolitude said:
I see. Yeah I'd be curious how well this looks compared to top notch 3D on the PC. The thing with 3D is that it has to be carefully matched up with proper games, engines and experiences. Invincible Tiger for exmaple...the worst 3D implementation in the history of gaming. That game does not need 3D as the effects are not made for it. Crysis 1 aslo was not a good 3D game as it had visuals and engine which did not give a great depth feeling (due to too many 2D textures) Left 4 dead on the PC on the other hand...great engine for 3D, blood splater on screen... simply amazing. What Im saying here is that Killzone 3 may be an amazing game, but it may not be the best experience for the 3D effect. |
So I guess you mean some games just aren't suited for a full immersive 3D experience?
Like Comparing Avatar's 3D effects to Clash of the Titans 3D effects where one was so great with 3D and the other wasn't?
I heard EYE PET's 3d was one of the most impressive, with the PS MOVE gameplay
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
