KylieDog said:
Not really.
First, above anything else in importance....its not GoldenEye without Brosnan. Its my number one Bond movie and not having Brosnan is an insult.
Second, I think remakes aren't worth doing if they are not going to be done of the latest and best technology. Should have been done on PS3 or 360, preferably the former since their exclusives tend to edge out the win a bit. To make things worse it doesn't even seem to be pushing the Wii much visually.
|
What you are saying sounds good in theory, and if were with some other IP I would be inclined to agree with you. However, you saw E3 I'm guessing. You know the dozens of shooters coming to the 360/PS3. Goldeneye would not be first priority to these owners when they are just going to mark out for Halo: Reach and the next COD.
There is just NO room for Goldeneye anywhere else. It needs some legs too; first week sales aren't the only ones they will need. On the PS3/360 side theres Portal and Crysis and Medal of Honor and Gears and Killzone and Ghost Recon...
I agree the graphics could be much better though. Activision has teams that worked on Wii FPSs before. If they are going to remake one of the best FPS games of all-time, they must do it justice.
Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."