By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Report: Microsoft Talking 3D Gaming "Soon"

Solid_Snake4RD said:
twesterm said:
disolitude said:

Reason Ms is silent is because they have no money to make off 3D.

The best dividens they could hope for by introducing 3D is to boost sales of the console slightly. However to do that, they have to make it a lot more user friendly than PS3.

There are 6 million existing 3D TV owners who can't use the PS3, not because their TV is not capable of showing 3D which PS3 is outputting...but because PS3 will not even turn 3D on unless your TV has HDMI 1.4.

There are also many millions of 120 hz monitor owners, CRT owners and projector users who can do 3D gaming but are left out in the cold for with the PS3 since it requires HDMI 1.4.

If 360 is able to introduce 3D which works for these users, it will easily make a bigger impact than PS3, which requires you to buy a brand new TV.

Actually, I think the biggest hinderence to 3D gaming is simply the glasses, that's where Nintendo got things right.


on a big TV without glass the 3Dimage will only be available if you sit stright infront of the screen.not so much on a small screen


Right, that's why the glasses suck-- you pretty much have to have them and it just plain sucks having to have them.  They get smudged easily, they're annoying to wear because they're those terrible unisex glasses, sucks even more to wear them ontop of glasses, and you have to have a pair for every possible person that might watch. 

When I'm watching TV by myself, I'm actually usually slightly left, when I'm watching TV with my wife, I'm always on the left and she's on the right.  The only time I'm ever in the middle of my couch is when I'm playing a game and even that's not 100%.

I've had as many as eight people crammed into my living rooms to watch movies, does that mean I need eight pairs of glasses?

Again, that's where Nintendo is doing things right-- you don't need the glasses.  Ever.

-edit-

Also note that I think that the 3DS is the end all of 3D gaming.  I haven't even seen it yet to know how good it is and I'm still not convinced 3D is the next big thing.  If Nintendo succeeds then I think handheld 3D may be a hit and if head tracking actually works that might be cool, but as far as I'm concerned anything having to do with wearing the glasses is a giant fail and the complete wrong direction.



Around the Network
twesterm said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
twesterm said:
disolitude said:

Reason Ms is silent is because they have no money to make off 3D.

The best dividens they could hope for by introducing 3D is to boost sales of the console slightly. However to do that, they have to make it a lot more user friendly than PS3.

There are 6 million existing 3D TV owners who can't use the PS3, not because their TV is not capable of showing 3D which PS3 is outputting...but because PS3 will not even turn 3D on unless your TV has HDMI 1.4.

There are also many millions of 120 hz monitor owners, CRT owners and projector users who can do 3D gaming but are left out in the cold for with the PS3 since it requires HDMI 1.4.

If 360 is able to introduce 3D which works for these users, it will easily make a bigger impact than PS3, which requires you to buy a brand new TV.

Actually, I think the biggest hinderence to 3D gaming is simply the glasses, that's where Nintendo got things right.


on a big TV without glass the 3Dimage will only be available if you sit stright infront of the screen.not so much on a small screen


Right, that's why the glasses suck-- you pretty much have to have them and it just plain sucks having to have them.  They get smudged easily, they're annoying to wear because they're those terrible unisex glasses, and you have to have a pair for every possible person that might watch. 

When I'm watching TV by myself, I'm actually usually slightly left, when I'm watching TV with my wife, I'm always on the left and she's on the right.  The only time I'm ever in the middle of my couch is when I'm playing a game and even that's not 100%.

I've had as many as eight people crammed into my living rooms to watch movies, does that mean I need eight pairs of glasses?

Again, that's where Nintendo is doing things right-- you don't need the glasses.  Ever.


yeah but NINTENDO isn't giving you action on a 70' screen but a tiny one

 

i think the smudges can be taken care off.

 

the glasses let you see the 3D action at different angles too,its just without glasses it tough

 

nobody likes them but for the next 2 years we will have to make do with these

 

and yeah those unisex glasses are annoying but you don't have to wear those outside

 

i have seen SONY and Panasonics 3D glasses and they are fine,they are like those sports glasses.



twesterm said:

Right, that's why the glasses suck-- you pretty much have to have them and it just plain sucks having to have them.  They get smudged easily, they're annoying to wear because they're those terrible unisex glasses, and you have to have a pair for every possible person that might watch.

I've had as many as eight people crammed into my living rooms to watch movies, does that mean I need eight pairs of glasses?

Again, that's where Nintendo is doing things right-- you don't need the glasses.  Ever.

i highly doubt 8 people can seat at the same position right in front of a 3D-TV where you don't need to wear glasses. you seem to forget you have to seat exactlly rigt in front, not to far, not to near, not to much on the left or on the right side of the TV because it will get blury the same maner as if you dont wear glasses in a 3D cinamax/imax.
i don't get it why some people have problems with wearing 3D glasses?!? it's nearlly the same as sun glasses. by the way, if you are watching a movie, you're looking at the screen & not how others look like with glasses.



twesterm said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
twesterm said:
disolitude said:

Reason Ms is silent is because they have no money to make off 3D.

The best dividens they could hope for by introducing 3D is to boost sales of the console slightly. However to do that, they have to make it a lot more user friendly than PS3.

There are 6 million existing 3D TV owners who can't use the PS3, not because their TV is not capable of showing 3D which PS3 is outputting...but because PS3 will not even turn 3D on unless your TV has HDMI 1.4.

There are also many millions of 120 hz monitor owners, CRT owners and projector users who can do 3D gaming but are left out in the cold for with the PS3 since it requires HDMI 1.4.

If 360 is able to introduce 3D which works for these users, it will easily make a bigger impact than PS3, which requires you to buy a brand new TV.

Actually, I think the biggest hinderence to 3D gaming is simply the glasses, that's where Nintendo got things right.


on a big TV without glass the 3Dimage will only be available if you sit stright infront of the screen.not so much on a small screen


Right, that's why the glasses suck-- you pretty much have to have them and it just plain sucks having to have them.  They get smudged easily, they're annoying to wear because they're those terrible unisex glasses, sucks even more to wear them ontop of glasses, and you have to have a pair for every possible person that might watch. 

When I'm watching TV by myself, I'm actually usually slightly left, when I'm watching TV with my wife, I'm always on the left and she's on the right.  The only time I'm ever in the middle of my couch is when I'm playing a game and even that's not 100%.

I've had as many as eight people crammed into my living rooms to watch movies, does that mean I need eight pairs of glasses?

Again, that's where Nintendo is doing things right-- you don't need the glasses.  Ever.

-edit-

Also note that I don't think that the 3DS is the end all of 3D gaming.  I haven't even seen it yet to know how good it is and I'm still not convinced 3D is the next big thing.  If Nintendo succeeds then I think handheld 3D may be a hit and if head tracking actually works that might be cool, but as far as I'm concerned anything having to do with wearing the glasses is a giant fail.


yeah i hate glasses too

even the sun glasses people wear all the time just to look 'COOL'

kudo tsunoda with those sunglasses looks so stupid all the time,i don't believe he wore it onstage at E3

 

anyways i have tested Panasonic's 3d glasses and they are very gripy sports like,like them



DukeOfLuxembourg said:
twesterm said:

Right, that's why the glasses suck-- you pretty much have to have them and it just plain sucks having to have them.  They get smudged easily, they're annoying to wear because they're those terrible unisex glasses, and you have to have a pair for every possible person that might watch.

I've had as many as eight people crammed into my living rooms to watch movies, does that mean I need eight pairs of glasses?

Again, that's where Nintendo is doing things right-- you don't need the glasses.  Ever.

i highly doubt 8 people can seat at the same position right in front of a 3D-TV where you don't need to wear glasses. you seem to forget you have to seat exactlly rigt in front, not to far, not to near, not to much on the left or on the right side of the TV because it will get blury the same maner as if you dont wear glasses in a 3D cinamax/imax.
i don't get it why some people have problems with wearing 3D glasses?!? it's nearlly the same as sun glasses. by the way, if you are watching a movie, you're looking at the screen & not how others look like with glasses.


"its the same as wearing sun glasses" - as we hate that too

 

 and the fact that glasses are on ur head u never relax and the uncomfortable thing keeps bugging me



Around the Network
Solid_Snake4RD said:
twesterm said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
twesterm said:
disolitude said:

Reason Ms is silent is because they have no money to make off 3D.

The best dividens they could hope for by introducing 3D is to boost sales of the console slightly. However to do that, they have to make it a lot more user friendly than PS3.

There are 6 million existing 3D TV owners who can't use the PS3, not because their TV is not capable of showing 3D which PS3 is outputting...but because PS3 will not even turn 3D on unless your TV has HDMI 1.4.

There are also many millions of 120 hz monitor owners, CRT owners and projector users who can do 3D gaming but are left out in the cold for with the PS3 since it requires HDMI 1.4.

If 360 is able to introduce 3D which works for these users, it will easily make a bigger impact than PS3, which requires you to buy a brand new TV.

Actually, I think the biggest hinderence to 3D gaming is simply the glasses, that's where Nintendo got things right.


on a big TV without glass the 3Dimage will only be available if you sit stright infront of the screen.not so much on a small screen


Right, that's why the glasses suck-- you pretty much have to have them and it just plain sucks having to have them.  They get smudged easily, they're annoying to wear because they're those terrible unisex glasses, and you have to have a pair for every possible person that might watch. 

When I'm watching TV by myself, I'm actually usually slightly left, when I'm watching TV with my wife, I'm always on the left and she's on the right.  The only time I'm ever in the middle of my couch is when I'm playing a game and even that's not 100%.

I've had as many as eight people crammed into my living rooms to watch movies, does that mean I need eight pairs of glasses?

Again, that's where Nintendo is doing things right-- you don't need the glasses.  Ever.


yeah but NINTENDO isn't giving you action on a 70' screen but a tiny one

 


It's like you're saying consoles are automatically better than handhelds because they're on a bigger screen which is just...wrong.

Yes, consoles work on larger screens but that's kind of a moot point.  When the draw is 3D and that draw is just plain inconvenient, it's a fail.



i think it's more a mind thing you don't like to wear glasses & that's why you can't relax. if you don't give much attention to it, maybe you could forget you're wearing some.



DukeOfLuxembourg said:
twesterm said:

Right, that's why the glasses suck-- you pretty much have to have them and it just plain sucks having to have them.  They get smudged easily, they're annoying to wear because they're those terrible unisex glasses, and you have to have a pair for every possible person that might watch.

I've had as many as eight people crammed into my living rooms to watch movies, does that mean I need eight pairs of glasses?

Again, that's where Nintendo is doing things right-- you don't need the glasses.  Ever.

i highly doubt 8 people can seat at the same position right in front of a 3D-TV where you don't need to wear glasses. you seem to forget you have to seat exactlly rigt in front, not to far, not to near, not to much on the left or on the right side of the TV because it will get blury the same maner as if you dont wear glasses in a 3D cinamax/imax.
i don't get it why some people have problems with wearing 3D glasses?!? it's nearlly the same as sun glasses. by the way, if you are watching a movie, you're looking at the screen & not how others look like with glasses.


I actually know little about 3D TV's but you're definately not helping the 3D cause with your first paragraph.

Are you saying you have to sit directly in front (or close to in front) for it to even work?  If so, that's an even bigger fail since you're likely never to get more than 3 people in a standard living room.  Even then, it's three people crammed on a single couch.

And I don't care what I look like in the glasses, they just aren't comfortable.  I guess I could buy some designer ones for a couple hundred dollars but I have no desire to be that large of a tool.



@ twesterm
i was talking about 3D-TV where you don't need glasses. i saw that few weeks ago on a TV show where they test all kind of technical stuff. the best 3D TVs were the one where you need active shutter glasses.



Solid_Snake4RD said:

SO then next GEN will be a 3D FULL HD 1080p GENERATION

PC 3D was at 1080p tech in 2009. Now the PC cutting edge is 3 screen surround at 1080p each...

So I don't know what console "next gen" will be doing...but they surely won't be cutting edge if they do 1080p 3D. :)