I'm recalling BHR-3's Uncharted 2 sales prediction thred and the smack people laid on him there. and I'm looking at the responses here and seeing people being a lot more wary of dismissing the predicitons based on what appear to be inconsequential associations.
Here's a counter coincidence though. Sony > 360 in 2007 and 2009 (odd numbered years). 360>PS3 in 2008 even numbered year. 2010 is an even numbered year. Also the current pattern is that PS3 and 360 alternate in terms which systems sells the most in a given year. There are coincidences in favour of PS3>360 and coincidences in favour of 360>PS3.
Another factor: BHR-3 lost his PS3 predicting mojo slightly at the end of 2009 by predicting 2 x 1 million HW sales weeks for PS3 in Holiday '09 which (disappointingly) didn't happen, though it did get within the margin for error for 2 weeks. So the mojo was not completely lost.
I'm yet to really get a sense of how Natal will be received by the wider not gaming obsessed public (i.e. those who are not gaming forum dwellers). But I am certain that Natal will be the deciding factor between whether BHR is right or wrong on this. But the success of Natal isn't only predicated on it having wider appeal than Move, it's also predicated on it substantially shifting interest away from the Wii (Move is the same). But PS3 sales momentum isn't as dependant (I think) on Move as 360's is on Natal.
I think PS3 hasn't got a hope in hell of making its 15 million for the FY unless there is a price drop of some description this holidays season (i.e. I think there will be a PS3 price drop of some sort this year) so I don't think price differential will be a factor this year, unlike 2008.
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix