By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Red Cross defends helping Taliban treat casualties

Source

 

Red Cross defends helping Taliban treat casualties

By the CNN Wire Staff

May 27, 2010 -- Updated 0650 GMT (1450 HKT)

 

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

Red Cross says it provided medical training to 70 members of 'armed opposition'

Agency says its mandate is to provide unbiased assistance

NATO has no issues with the practice Red Cross defends helping Taliban treat casualties

International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies

 

(CNN) -- The International Committee of the Red Cross is defending its practice of providing medical training and basic medical supplies to the Taliban in Afghanistan -- saying it is in line with the ICRC's mandate not to discriminate between different sides in a conflict.

In the latest situation report issued Tuesday, the Red Cross disclosed that in April its workers "reached over 100 Afghan security personnel, over 70 members of the armed opposition, taxi drivers involved in the transport of wounded people, first-aiders and its own staff."

That prompted plenty of quizzical and some critical comments in the international media and among bloggers -- and some grumbling among Afghan officials.

But an ICRC spokesman in Geneva said the practice is consistent with its obligation of neutrality and its mandate to provide assistance to all sides in conflict.

The ICRC says it provides a three-day course that includes lessons in international humanitarian law, practical work with bandages and other basic medical techniques.

It says the course is also a chance to remind all sides about respect for civilians and proper treatment of detainees.

Some critics have drawn a distinction between providing medical care to the wounded and training insurgents to do so. But the ICRC says it has provided similar training in Darfur, Sudan and to Hamas members in Gaza.

ICRC spokesman Christian Cardon says it has been providing such training in Afghanistan for about four years to the Taliban as well as to Afghan police and civilian first-aiders. He added that the ICRC was not training the Taliban in surgical skills; the focus was on stabilizing those injured.

The ICRC says that roadblocks, fighting and mines have made access to hospitals very difficult -- especially in provinces like Helmand and Kandahar in the south of Afghanistan.

The International Security Assistance Force says it has no issues with Red Cross workers training insurgents in medical care.

"We recognize the need for their work to be executed impartially -- and it's precisely for this reason that they are able to gain the access that they do," Lt. Col. Joseph T Breasseale told CNN. "One of the litany of things that separates the international coalition from the Taliban is that we have frequently provided first aid to injured Taliban fighters and we will continue to do so."

The ICRC says the three-day first-aid courses are a small part of its program in Afghanistan. In April it conducted a war surgery workshop for dozens of doctors, and supported the regional hospital in Kandahar in performing almost 1,000 operations.

The ICRC says it has 1,500 national and 140 international staff in Afghanistan.

 

 

 

 

 

What do you think? I think the red cross should remain neutral.



Around the Network

I agree. The Red Cross/Crescent's mandate is to preserve human health and welfare. Their neutrality and independence is a huge asset in this goal. Questions of politics and justice are for other organizations to consider, and shouldn't get in between a wounded person and doctor.



"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event."  — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.

completely agree with famousringo.



I agree.



famousringo said everything that needed to be said.

OT: It's good to see that Red Cross is doing such a thing.



PSN ID: KingFate_

Around the Network

id have less of a problem with it, if it were just "armed opposition"...and not people who like to throw acid in the faces of little girls who just want to go to school.



"I like my steaks how i like my women.  Bloody and all over my face"

"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur

Yes heal them so they can kill more American, UK and Nato troops.



they don't have to defend themselves here, the red cross is the only fraction in a war that does the right thing - helping people without any discrimination

I think their neutrality serves the west better than any army could.



Completely agree. They should and hopefully will remain neutral.



Their is no reason for them to even defend, it is what they do and have always done.