Okay, just checking.

I just found it odd to be in the same paragraph as your slight complaints. I was about to say though, "docking Mario for not having multiplayer? Buh?!"

Well then that's poor writing on your part.  That's the impression I got upon reading the review.  By bringing it up, you imply it's important.  You wouldn't (shouldn't?) bring up things that aren't relevant in a review.  You're doing that here.  Then, you bring up a lack of "true multiplayer" in a paragraph that begins talking about things that get in the way of perfection.  Assuming you're actually using paragraphs correctly and not changing subjects midparagraph, your review says something completely different from what you're saying in this thread.

If you don't mind me asking, how is a lack of "true multiplayer" worth mentioning if it isn't a feature the game needs to have and doesn't have?

I don't really take issue with the score, only with the lack of clarity within the review.  I've been noticing it a while on the site and it's starting to frustrate me.

the review is not bad, but vgchartz is the new edge

I mean I was expecting tad higher (first 10 on vgchartz)

Then you really don't know much about how we review games here at VGChartz.

9.6 - very nice

@sece: it was just a joke