By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Microsoft and LG partnership gives you 3D gaming on Xbox360

Lord Flashheart said:

That's what I was thinking?
If they do exist other than the 15" one of course they would.
I'm shocked he owns a non-sony product.

Samsung is working on OLED screens also and if you go by the wikipedia entry on OLED technology they are currently ahead of Sony.



Around the Network

So many corporations and uni's are working on OLED it's very exciting.
Hull University have developed a process of manufacturing OLED cheaper.

*waits for someone to use the Blackadder joke*



Ldn.se said:
lilc64 said:
The only thing i dont get about Microsoft going 3D is :With Sony you have a 3D gaming console and a 3D blu ray player all in one. Is Microsoft and LG going to offer something type of package deal where you get a 3D blu ray player. Seems it would kick the price up but they have to make the deal more appetizing.


Multiple DVD 3D movie is an option. No one complains about getting up to change DVD when playing FF13 so it might work.

No way, who would spend the money on a HD 3D tv just to watch standard def. 3D dvd's. I think they pretty much have to implement some kind of blu ray deal or no one will go for it.



Jereel Hunter said:
Grooski said:
Cross-X said:
megaman79 said:

well, looks like its good timing for all of them.

 

Oh and lulz @ MS partnering with a Korean company instead of japanese.

You know why?

Because Samsung and LG HD TVs and 3d TVs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sony Bravia TVs

Pretty much when it comes to electronics, Samsung beats Sony any day whether it be laptops, TVs, Phones, etc.

 

Yeah you keep telling yourself that.

Yes, do keep telling yourself that. And consumer reviews. and professional reviews.

 

You do realize that Samsung is the virtually undisputed chief when it comes to HDTVs, right?

Professional reviews are typically something I never trust on consumer electronics. Way to easily to be paid off to give a good review.

Consumer reviews can also be questionable. If you ever look a lot of the reviews are useless fanboyism. It takes some time to find the good reviews of a product.

 

At the end of the day, yes Samsung is the #1 HDTV manufacturer in the world, but any manufacturer within the top 5 makes insanely high-quality TVs. Buying a Toshiba, Sony, Samsung, Visio, or LG really makes no difference now a days when having to worry about buying a bad product. Just stay away from the Walmart versions of theeir TVs. They are truly garbage.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
selnor said:
Jordahn said:
disolitude said:
Jordahn said:
 

First of all, Sharp makes excellent TV's.  To say that LG and Samsung are better than Sharp is OPINIONATED.  Also, the panels made by Sharp for SONY HDTV's are not the same as the ones that go into Sharp's HDTV's.  Sharp does not use BRAVIA technology.  SONY does.  Let's not cloud the FACTS to push a personal point.

Err...no.

The Bravia and Sharp LCD pannel is exactly the same. Bravia display engine is not found in Sharp TVs and vice versa but the display pannel is exactly the same. Sony does some cool stuff with its display features and Bravias and are better than Sharps, but they certanly aren't buying sharp pannels cause they are the best. They switched from Samsung cause Sharp was cheaper...

Most people that follow TV's know that while Sharp used to be at the top (2007ish), they have fallen behind in quality in the top end models. You won't find many Sharp TVs (if any) that are on any "Best TV listings" these days.

well what do you know...here is such a list for the 2010 models - http://reviews.cnet.com/best-hdtvs/

Well what do you know...  ONE single source to prove a point.  Go to Sound and Vision...

http://www.soundandvisionmag.com/category/site-channel/tests-reviews/hdtvs/projectors

You'll find a variety of brands making LCD's and other tv technologies that received their "Certified & Recommended" stamp.

Just to point out, reccomended is different to best of. What Hifi in UK ( The most respected UK Home Cinema magazine along with Home Cinema ) Both dont have any SOny or Sharp products in the best of 2009. Thats top 5 for Bluray players, HDTV's etc etc. Not 1 single Sony or Sharp product. But then that is out of what was available to physically buy off shelves at the end of 2009 in UK.

Invalid - attempt to interject one's personal interpretation of a word by citing an example of a different source independent of the original source the word was derived from.

So thank you for wasting bandwidth.  ;)



Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.

Around the Network

Great good job ms.



 

   PROUD MEMBER OF THE PLAYSTATION 3 : RPG FAN CLUB

 

Jordahn said:
selnor said:
Jordahn said:
disolitude said:
Jordahn said:
 

First of all, Sharp makes excellent TV's.  To say that LG and Samsung are better than Sharp is OPINIONATED.  Also, the panels made by Sharp for SONY HDTV's are not the same as the ones that go into Sharp's HDTV's.  Sharp does not use BRAVIA technology.  SONY does.  Let's not cloud the FACTS to push a personal point.

Err...no.

The Bravia and Sharp LCD pannel is exactly the same. Bravia display engine is not found in Sharp TVs and vice versa but the display pannel is exactly the same. Sony does some cool stuff with its display features and Bravias and are better than Sharps, but they certanly aren't buying sharp pannels cause they are the best. They switched from Samsung cause Sharp was cheaper...

Most people that follow TV's know that while Sharp used to be at the top (2007ish), they have fallen behind in quality in the top end models. You won't find many Sharp TVs (if any) that are on any "Best TV listings" these days.

well what do you know...here is such a list for the 2010 models - http://reviews.cnet.com/best-hdtvs/

Well what do you know...  ONE single source to prove a point.  Go to Sound and Vision...

http://www.soundandvisionmag.com/category/site-channel/tests-reviews/hdtvs/projectors

You'll find a variety of brands making LCD's and other tv technologies that received their "Certified & Recommended" stamp.

Just to point out, reccomended is different to best of. What Hifi in UK ( The most respected UK Home Cinema magazine along with Home Cinema ) Both dont have any SOny or Sharp products in the best of 2009. Thats top 5 for Bluray players, HDTV's etc etc. Not 1 single Sony or Sharp product. But then that is out of what was available to physically buy off shelves at the end of 2009 in UK.

Invalid - attempt to interject one's personal interpretation of a word by citing an example of a different source independent of the original source the word was derived from.

So thank you for wasting bandwidth.  ;)

Um not at all. What Hifi have given a reccomendation to Sony TV's in 2009. But there is no Sony TV's in their beest of 2009. So my point is which you have missed entirely is that a recommendation is entitrely different to Best of. You see?The source that was quoted was not a best of. It was a review with a reccomendation. In other words a good TV. But by no means is it a best of or top 5. :)



kowenicki said:
Lord Flashheart said:

That's what I was thinking?
If they do exist other than the 15" one of course they would.
I'm shocked he owns a non-sony product.


lol.

Me too, the 11 inch OLED costs £2500 here... and of course an OLED looks better than a LED, they are totally different.

http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10151&catalogId=10551&langId=-1&productId=8198552921665327724

well they have it for a while, :p

while samsung was getting LED, sony also OLED 40' on sale.



Xoj said:
kowenicki said:
Lord Flashheart said:

That's what I was thinking?
If they do exist other than the 15" one of course they would.
I'm shocked he owns a non-sony product.


lol.

Me too, the 11 inch OLED costs £2500 here... and of course an OLED looks better than a LED, they are totally different.

http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10151&catalogId=10551&langId=-1&productId=8198552921665327724

well they have it for a while, :p

while samsung was getting LED, sony also OLED 40' on sale.

I think the point they are making to you is that your comparing LED to OLED.

Basically, Sony dont make the best LCD's, dont make the best LED's. And when we have comparative OLED's to compare you'll find they wont have the best OLED's. At least according to the researchers out there.



selnor said:
Xoj said:
kowenicki said:
Lord Flashheart said:

That's what I was thinking?
If they do exist other than the 15" one of course they would.
I'm shocked he owns a non-sony product.


lol.

Me too, the 11 inch OLED costs £2500 here... and of course an OLED looks better than a LED, they are totally different.

http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10151&catalogId=10551&langId=-1&productId=8198552921665327724

well they have it for a while, :p

while samsung was getting LED, sony also OLED 40' on sale.

I think the point they are making to you is that your comparing LED to OLED.

Basically, Sony dont make the best LCD's, dont make the best LED's. And when we have comparative OLED's to compare you'll find they wont have the best OLED's. At least according to the researchers out there.

well remember they are also making wallpaper TV too. Frankly Sony R&Ds some interesting tech. Implementation might not be the best, but its always interesting and of good quality.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453