By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Microsoft and LG partnership gives you 3D gaming on Xbox360

V-r0cK on 11 May 2010
disolitude said:
Chris Hu said:
GuiltySpartan77 said:

actually he is right sony hasn't been the leader of T.V's, phones, or any other electronic since the 21st century started 

That's why they went into the video game market.  At least they where one of the co developers of Bu-ray but the first Blu-ray player available in the US market was made by Samsung.  They where also the leaders when it comes to OLED TV's but have been surpassed in that field by Samsung also.


Speaking of OLED...Whats taking so long?

I read that OLED were to be put on hold to focus on the 3D market.  As well because consumers arent ready for OLED since LED is just introduced.  Thats what i read tho, not sure how much of it is true. 

I just feel that 1) OLED needs to be hell of a lot cheaper if they want to mass market it 2) Get ride of a display technology whether its LCD and/or Plasma.  It'll just confuse costumers more if when looking for a TV they have to decide between Plasma/LCD/LED/OLED.  I've seen some clueless between LCD and LED aside that they know its thinner.



Around the Network
flacomeza on 11 May 2010
Xoj said:
Garnett said:
Oh snap Alan Wake 3D?

at full HD 320x240 :p ehehe

 

I would say something like Awake Alan, thats not possible!



Chris Hu on 11 May 2010
V-r0cK said:
disolitude said:
Chris Hu said:
GuiltySpartan77 said:

actually he is right sony hasn't been the leader of T.V's, phones, or any other electronic since the 21st century started 

That's why they went into the video game market.  At least they where one of the co developers of Bu-ray but the first Blu-ray player available in the US market was made by Samsung.  They where also the leaders when it comes to OLED TV's but have been surpassed in that field by Samsung also.


Speaking of OLED...Whats taking so long?

I read that OLED were to be put on hold to focus on the 3D market.  As well because consumers arent ready for OLED since LED is just introduced.  Thats what i read tho, not sure how much of it is true. 

I just feel that 1) OLED needs to be hell of a lot cheaper if they want to mass market it 2) Get ride of a display technology whether its LCD and/or Plasma.  It'll just confuse costumers more if when looking for a TV they have to decide between Plasma/LCD/LED/OLED.  I've seen some clueless between LCD and LED aside that they know its thinner.

Plama is dying a slow death.  Panasonic is really the only company that is still actively promoting it, so once they are done its time for OLED to enter the market.  LCD will still be arround for a long time because for TV's less then 32 inches in size its pretty much still the only choice if you want a mass market priced product.



disolitude on 11 May 2010
Chris Hu said:
V-r0cK said:
disolitude said:
Chris Hu said:
GuiltySpartan77 said:

actually he is right sony hasn't been the leader of T.V's, phones, or any other electronic since the 21st century started 

That's why they went into the video game market.  At least they where one of the co developers of Bu-ray but the first Blu-ray player available in the US market was made by Samsung.  They where also the leaders when it comes to OLED TV's but have been surpassed in that field by Samsung also.


Speaking of OLED...Whats taking so long?

I read that OLED were to be put on hold to focus on the 3D market.  As well because consumers arent ready for OLED since LED is just introduced.  Thats what i read tho, not sure how much of it is true. 

I just feel that 1) OLED needs to be hell of a lot cheaper if they want to mass market it 2) Get ride of a display technology whether its LCD and/or Plasma.  It'll just confuse costumers more if when looking for a TV they have to decide between Plasma/LCD/LED/OLED.  I've seen some clueless between LCD and LED aside that they know its thinner.

Plama is dying a slow death.  Panasonic is really the only company that is still actively promoting it, so once they are done its time for OLED to enter the market.  LCD will still be arround for a long time because for TV's less then 32 inches in size its pretty much still the only choice if you want a mass market priced product.


You say that now but wait till you see 3D on plasma vs LCD. I am not sayign you are wrong, but Plasmas are quite better for 3D viewing due to better screen refresh rate and better contrast.

Then again, DLP destroys both LCd and Plasma for 3D and they are all but dead at this point so...



Jordahn on 11 May 2010
disolitude said:
V-r0cK said:
I think its funny how many are talking about Samsung when this is about LG. Like you know Sony>LG so you have to team LG up with Samsung to make Samsung+LG>Sony lol.

As for overprice Sony TVs, I really dont see much of a price difference between Sony and Samsung if you compare size and specs. It all comes down to preference in the end between the two.

OT: Good for MS and LG partnership, but wouldve been bigger if it was with Samsung lol.

Samsung used to make Sony LCD pannels until 2008... Sharp has been making them since. So when one buys a Sony TV today, they get a Sharp screen... Say what you will about LG and Sony but we should both agree that LG and Samsung is better than Sharp.

In any case, its good to see 3D coming form 360 as well. Now all we need is a general driver that downsamples the games resolution and projects the 360 game in checkerboard pattern...as well as works for 100s of games. Its not going to work if individual games need to make their own drivers...like for the PS3.

First of all, Sharp makes excellent TV's.  To say that LG and Samsung are better than Sharp is OPINIONATED.  Also, the panels made by Sharp for SONY HDTV's are not the same as the ones that go into Sharp's HDTV's.  Sharp does not use BRAVIA technology.  SONY does.  Let's not cloud the FACTS to push a personal point.



Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.

Around the Network
Bamboleo on 11 May 2010
Kyuubi Ricky SSJ2 said:
Bamboleo said:

This why 3D gaming with glasses suck.

My regular glasses are these:

Now tell how am I supposed to wear those 3D shutter glasses over this ones.

Showing off your Armani glasses.... for shame XD

Just showing the glasses really. Not show off at all. To show off I can post here my new pricey guitar:

Now this is actually quality show off!

<3

 



Jordahn on 11 May 2010
Bamboleo said:
Kyuubi Ricky SSJ2 said:
Bamboleo said:

This why 3D gaming with glasses suck.

My regular glasses are these:

Now tell how am I supposed to wear those 3D shutter glasses over this ones.

Showing off your Armani glasses.... for shame XD

Just showing the glasses really. Not show off at all. To show off I can post here my new pricey guitar:

Now this is actually quality show off!

<3

 

Very nice, and point strongly driven.



Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.

disolitude on 11 May 2010
Jordahn said:
disolitude said:
V-r0cK said:
I think its funny how many are talking about Samsung when this is about LG. Like you know Sony>LG so you have to team LG up with Samsung to make Samsung+LG>Sony lol.

As for overprice Sony TVs, I really dont see much of a price difference between Sony and Samsung if you compare size and specs. It all comes down to preference in the end between the two.

OT: Good for MS and LG partnership, but wouldve been bigger if it was with Samsung lol.

Samsung used to make Sony LCD pannels until 2008... Sharp has been making them since. So when one buys a Sony TV today, they get a Sharp screen... Say what you will about LG and Sony but we should both agree that LG and Samsung is better than Sharp.

In any case, its good to see 3D coming form 360 as well. Now all we need is a general driver that downsamples the games resolution and projects the 360 game in checkerboard pattern...as well as works for 100s of games. Its not going to work if individual games need to make their own drivers...like for the PS3.

First of all, Sharp makes excellent TV's.  To say that LG and Samsung are better than Sharp is OPINIONATED.  Also, the panels made by Sharp for SONY HDTV's are not the same as the ones that go into Sharp's HDTV's.  Sharp does not use BRAVIA technology.  SONY does.  Let's not cloud the FACTS to push a personal point.

Err...no.

The Bravia and Sharp LCD pannel is exactly the same. Bravia display engine is not found in Sharp TVs and vice versa but the display pannel is exactly the same. Sony does some cool stuff with its display features and Bravias and are better than Sharps, but they certanly aren't buying sharp pannels cause they are the best. They switched from Samsung cause Sharp was cheaper...

Most people that follow TV's know that while Sharp used to be at the top (2007ish), they have fallen behind in quality in the top end models. You won't find many Sharp TVs (if any) that are on any "Best TV listings" these days.

well what do you know...here is such a list for the 2010 models - http://reviews.cnet.com/best-hdtvs/



Chris Hu on 11 May 2010
disolitude said:
Chris Hu said:
V-r0cK said:
disolitude said:
Chris Hu said:
GuiltySpartan77 said:

actually he is right sony hasn't been the leader of T.V's, phones, or any other electronic since the 21st century started 

That's why they went into the video game market.  At least they where one of the co developers of Bu-ray but the first Blu-ray player available in the US market was made by Samsung.  They where also the leaders when it comes to OLED TV's but have been surpassed in that field by Samsung also.


Speaking of OLED...Whats taking so long?

I read that OLED were to be put on hold to focus on the 3D market.  As well because consumers arent ready for OLED since LED is just introduced.  Thats what i read tho, not sure how much of it is true. 

I just feel that 1) OLED needs to be hell of a lot cheaper if they want to mass market it 2) Get ride of a display technology whether its LCD and/or Plasma.  It'll just confuse costumers more if when looking for a TV they have to decide between Plasma/LCD/LED/OLED.  I've seen some clueless between LCD and LED aside that they know its thinner.

Plama is dying a slow death.  Panasonic is really the only company that is still actively promoting it, so once they are done its time for OLED to enter the market.  LCD will still be arround for a long time because for TV's less then 32 inches in size its pretty much still the only choice if you want a mass market priced product.


You say that now but wait till you see 3D on plasma vs LCD. I am not sayign you are wrong, but Plasmas are quite better for 3D viewing due to better screen refresh rate and better contrast.

Then again, DLP destroys both LCd and Plasma for 3D and they are all but dead at this point so...

At this point 3D TV's are nothing more then a fad and they will not really take off untill you have a 3D TV that doesn't require the wearing of those silly overpriced glasses.



disolitude on 11 May 2010
Chris Hu said:
disolitude said:
Chris Hu said:
V-r0cK said:
disolitude said:
Chris Hu said:
GuiltySpartan77 said:

actually he is right sony hasn't been the leader of T.V's, phones, or any other electronic since the 21st century started 

That's why they went into the video game market.  At least they where one of the co developers of Bu-ray but the first Blu-ray player available in the US market was made by Samsung.  They where also the leaders when it comes to OLED TV's but have been surpassed in that field by Samsung also.


Speaking of OLED...Whats taking so long?

I read that OLED were to be put on hold to focus on the 3D market.  As well because consumers arent ready for OLED since LED is just introduced.  Thats what i read tho, not sure how much of it is true. 

I just feel that 1) OLED needs to be hell of a lot cheaper if they want to mass market it 2) Get ride of a display technology whether its LCD and/or Plasma.  It'll just confuse costumers more if when looking for a TV they have to decide between Plasma/LCD/LED/OLED.  I've seen some clueless between LCD and LED aside that they know its thinner.

Plama is dying a slow death.  Panasonic is really the only company that is still actively promoting it, so once they are done its time for OLED to enter the market.  LCD will still be arround for a long time because for TV's less then 32 inches in size its pretty much still the only choice if you want a mass market priced product.


You say that now but wait till you see 3D on plasma vs LCD. I am not sayign you are wrong, but Plasmas are quite better for 3D viewing due to better screen refresh rate and better contrast.

Then again, DLP destroys both LCd and Plasma for 3D and they are all but dead at this point so...

At this point 3D TV's are nothing more then a fad and they will not really take off untill you have a 3D TV that doesn't require the wearing of those silly overpriced glasses.

haha...I dont know man. Maybe for movie watching...but Left 4 Dead 2 and Metro 2033 are pretty rad in 3D. Once people see this, I don't see this fad going away.