I've never seen such a collective ass kissing for a 3rd place console.

so ps3 epeen jerkcircle? got it

thats cause for some reason a vast majority of ps3 owners seem to get more satisfaction out of praising the ps3's specs, the systems "unrealized" "potential", and ad campaigns then actually using their system for playing games.  I personally think apple and sony should merge that way their fanboys can fuse together into one giant glutenous blob of corporate d*ck sucking.... would make my day to see that happen

See the threads about how Unreal Engine has held back 360 development, and how Alan Wake is a harbinger of future 360 awesomeness.  And I don't remember so much instantaneous quibbling and damage control from PS3 fans as you guys are displaying here.  Seriously, you want everyone to believe PS3 fans are just so much more distasteful than other fans?  Give me an f-ing break, that just shows you are in damage control spin mode.

First you claimed PS3 had been lead pretty much from the beginning, when the article you linked just said that some games were starting to be developed for PS3 first and reporting it like it was big news, then you backtracked to, "but why is this important," now you guys are belittling PS3 because it - my god, is in 3rd place after launching a year after 360.  Lame.   Plus PS3 software sales are kicking the shit out of 360's lately, so presumably PS3 owners are liking the games.

Damage control.

yup im damage controlling all right, i should be getting my check from mircosoft on this coming moday.  Im assuming sony is all paying you all pretty good for your constant d*ck sucking right?  My link was to show you that this is in fact....not news, notice the late 2007 time stap on it?, and i honestly asked why anyone cares.  The only person that would care about ps3 being the lead dev on a game is a diehard ps3 d*ck sucking fanboy....that is the entire point im trying to make.........And last time i checked both the wii and the 360 beat the shit out of the ps3 in total games sold so i dont know what the hell your talking about...and thats with the wii and the 360s "inferior" graphics being rendered on an "inferior" system, and in the case of the 360 not being in the lead dev state...yet no one that owns a 360 seems to care.....i wonder why that is?

^^ SOMEONE sure seems to care.  And, funny, I thought the article posted in the OP had plenty of new information in it, but yes perhaps there has been a continuing trend in this direction (more and more PS3 focus from devs) for some time.  Sounds good to me.

So its only now when the PS3 is obsolete hardware that they appreciate it? Funny stuff...

What's that make 360?  Malfunctioning obsolete?

You're a naughty boy. I choose to not respond to your inciteful and hurtful comments.

sony fans constantly need reassurance so for them to broadcast this sorta thing helps to keep them from going out with pitchforks..

lots of games lead development on the ps3 and yet the 360 version pretty much holds up equally.
EA especially have titles have leader development on the ps3, burnout paradise, dead space, all their sports titles, BF's frostbite engine.

Hell if a ps3 game gets ported and it runs perfectly on the 360 but if done vice versa and you build a game on the 360 then port it to the ps3 and it runs poorly it only hurts the fact that the ps3 isnt powerful enough to accommodate 360 graphics.

what else i find funny is how horribly of a port job ff13 was and did MS fanboys go up in arms? nope. difference in framerate that most players would have never noticed if not told explicitly in the case of bayonetta, the game was pretty much labeled trash and sega got so much shit for it.... what a world of double standards we live in...