Recently I got banned on the forums for stating the Uncharted series looks better than Alan Wake based the first footage of the game (this due to repeated hype by some VGChartz forum members it's the technically most impressive console game). I did however state I thought the game looked cool.
I did not know you could get banned for such a thing. I think many still remember the time when Resistance: Fall of Man launched for the PS3, we had many people bringing up the looks of Gears of War on the XBox 360 at the time. That was uncalled for as nobody was claiming it was the best looking game out there. Later games like Uncharted: Drake's Fortune arrived for the PS3 and the mention of Gears of War pretty much died with that, but instead very often Crysis on highend gaming PCs was brought into the discussion when a top notch PS3 game was about to be released...
I do not protest the ban, but do find this ackward and would like to get more information.
Given ban reason: Bringing up Uncharted in this thread.
Some example comments from other (not banned) people within that thread, before I actually posted:
"best graphics on 360 and can rival anything on the ps3"
"the atmosphere does not compare with Fatal Frame or Silent Hill 1 & 2"
"To be honest, it doesn't look that much better than Silent Hill Homecoming or Alone in the Dark right now."
"Uncharted has better graphics"
So does it affect what is allowed or not allowed based on the console, or the game in question or the poster? Why pretend I started such comparisons? (maybe I just provided better arguments for backing up this statement?)
















