@Euphoria14, I love your profile pic, quite amazing

I don't know... as far as the stuff he was happy about and complained about it seems pretty on par with the IGN Review.  Except he just see's the diffculty level being oldschool as bad rather then good and that being a ripoff/homage = bad.  His actual negatives and positives other then that match up pretty much the same.

I'm also confused, he's reviewing an import copy?  Cause didn't IGN comment on the dialog?

Teletext are stupid, the game has been completed for the west for over a month now. No idea why he is reviewing an import copy. GameInformer reviewed the US version too.

I've never really liked Teletext.

Teletext want Edge's crown for harshness!

they was ok back in the snes megadrive era, used to check every thursday, it was called digitizer

The graphics look pretty cool, but come on, it's not hard to make squares look good!

Anyways, my major complaint is... why can't they get the shadows to look right? I mean, for goodness sake, they're squares, not complicated shapes, and yet the shadows are jaggedy as hell...

I hate games with bad shadows...

yaknow ? on a serious note they are ARGUABLY the best as... the developers WANTED to make a pixelated game and they have got it down PERFECTLY i mean... how much more PERFECT can you get Pixels amiright?

in other news "it plays too much like snes zelda"?

STOP SELLING ME THE GAME MORE :D

Oops it somehow doubleposted my above post, lol o.O

You should make a thread about all the games with bad shadows

Teletext are incredibly harsh on many games, but the problem here is that their reasoning for giving it such a low score can be applied to just about every game in the industry.