letsdance said:
|
Link already has the Triforce.
letsdance said:
|
Link already has the Triforce.
| dampowell said: Okay... I don't think this had been said. But if the Hero of Time... does not show up to defeat Kratos... or dies.. he will be reborn in another boy to face the evil again. So even if Kratos wins the first fight... he'll have millennia of fights to stop link. |
In a nuetral world there would be nobody to be reborn back into, also Kratos would return to his world's hades as well... and not be able to make it back. So really ressurection is out of the question for both.

silliest argument ever. Like either one of them could take Mario. He pounds things into the ground with his plumber sized ass.
"But as always, technology refused to be dignity's bitch."--Vance DeGeneres
Kasz216 said:
No, it's not. Your assuming the cloak was a "programming mistake" based on nothing but more then your PURE desire for Kratos to win. When the developers quite literally had to add this in, unlike "bomb invincibility" which could of been an oversite of omission. |
And you are assuming it wasn't when nothing describes it working the way you do and only a few short years ago they had an oversight. That is why in this situation we need to apply logic... something you and Khuutra have ignored the whole thread.
Kasz216 said:
Thankfully for link you've created a scenario where Link starts with the Triforce. Though the Triforce is really just pure spite for Link anyway. It's like giving Thanos the Infinity Gauntlet in a fight vs Wolverine. |
Yet there is no clearity with what happens after Link touches the tri-force... andyou said so yourself that it goes away after the wish is granted. If it where all powerful like you claim with multiple wishes Ganon being the smart sorcerer that he is should have wished him out of existance.
And can you stop with the comic analogies. Ive never been a big comic fan. I don't think Ive ever owned a single one.
Kasz216 said:
In a nuetral world there would be nobody to be reborn back into, also Kratos would return to his world's hades as well... and not be able to make it back. So really ressurection is out of the question for both. |
In a neutral world, neither of them would potentially be who they are.
For instance. Superman would just be MAN if he was in a neutral world. There would be no yellow sun to exploit. That makes the whole argument baseless... Basically this entire thread is just Nintedo vs Sony... so why not just base it on which sells better? That is what VgChartz is about anyways.
letsdance said:
|
That's not even remotely logical.
What your argueing is the equivelent of... "I made the oversite of locking my keys in the car" vs "I made the oversite of throwing my keys in the toilet and flushing it... because, I felt like doing it."
Oversite A happens a lot. Oversite B pretty much NEVER happens... because the person actually realizes what he's doing.

letsdance said:
|
Yeah, i was WRONG on that. I went back and looked at the ending of LttP and realized he made more then 1 wish. To be honest, i'm not that big a Zelda fan.
It's just like how I'm not a big Superman fan... yet I know Superman would beat Wolverine in a fight.
Unlike you... I don't have a "Dog in the fight".

dampowell said:
In a neutral world, neither of them would potentially be who they are. For instance. Superman would just be MAN if he was in a neutral world. There would be no yellow sun to exploit. That makes the whole argument baseless... Basically this entire thread is just Nintedo vs Sony... so why not just base it on which sells better? That is what VgChartz is about anyways. |
A nuetral world means "A world in which all their powers work like they do in their own worlds."
So, Kratos power would work just like it would in his own world... he would go to Hades in his physical form.... in the GOW universe.
Link would be reborn... in the body of a Hyrulian... in Hyrule.
Superman keeps his powers in a nuetral setting. It's been done more then enough in versus settings.

Letsdance if you don't stop bringing up a point that Kasz admitted he was wrong about, I'm going to start thinking that you're ignoring that on purpose just to benefit your argument.